RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    리더십 유형, 정서적 반응, 혁신행동간의 구조적 관계 = The structural relationship between leadership styles, emotional response, and Innovational Behavior

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103434680

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study endeavors to find out the best model in the constructional relationship between several factors. The constructional relationship composed of the three types of leadership pattern (i.e., change-oriented leadership, relations-oriented leadership and sacrificial leadership) and the self-efficacy, job motivation, innovational behavior as the emotional responses of subordinate.
    Based on the four competitive models, several Chi-square difference tests on each model are implemented. As a result, this study shows the following optimal model; two types of leadership(change-oriented leadership, sacrificial leadership) affect positively the self-efficacy of subordinates. The sacrificial leadership gives the indirect impact on the Innovational Behavior through the self-identification and job-motivation. The fitness of the model is found to be χ2=609.915, df=338, p<.001, GFI=0.870, NFI=.897, CFI=0.951, RMR=0.039.
    The main points of this study are; first, the two factors which the new leadership paradigm requires are selected for the study. Of the two factors, the former is the innovational behavior through which the important flexibility in the leadership measurement is measured. The latter is the self-efficacy and the job motivation which are the emotional responses of subordinates. Finally, this paper provides the useful information for the application toward the real world by categorizing the leader behaviors as the three types through the previous literature survey.
    번역하기

    This study endeavors to find out the best model in the constructional relationship between several factors. The constructional relationship composed of the three types of leadership pattern (i.e., change-oriented leadership, relations-oriented leaders...

    This study endeavors to find out the best model in the constructional relationship between several factors. The constructional relationship composed of the three types of leadership pattern (i.e., change-oriented leadership, relations-oriented leadership and sacrificial leadership) and the self-efficacy, job motivation, innovational behavior as the emotional responses of subordinate.
    Based on the four competitive models, several Chi-square difference tests on each model are implemented. As a result, this study shows the following optimal model; two types of leadership(change-oriented leadership, sacrificial leadership) affect positively the self-efficacy of subordinates. The sacrificial leadership gives the indirect impact on the Innovational Behavior through the self-identification and job-motivation. The fitness of the model is found to be χ2=609.915, df=338, p<.001, GFI=0.870, NFI=.897, CFI=0.951, RMR=0.039.
    The main points of this study are; first, the two factors which the new leadership paradigm requires are selected for the study. Of the two factors, the former is the innovational behavior through which the important flexibility in the leadership measurement is measured. The latter is the self-efficacy and the job motivation which are the emotional responses of subordinates. Finally, this paper provides the useful information for the application toward the real world by categorizing the leader behaviors as the three types through the previous literature survey.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
    • Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설설정
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과
    • Ⅴ. 논의 및 제언
    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
    • Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설설정
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과
    • Ⅴ. 논의 및 제언
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼