좋은 수퍼비전 관계에 대한 수퍼바이지의 인식 차원 = The Dimensionality of Supervisees' Perceptions of a Good Supervisory Relationship

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 좋은 수퍼비전 관계에 대한 수퍼바이지의 잠재적 인식 차원을 확인하고, 수퍼바이지의 경력수준에 따른 각 차원의 상대적 중요도를 비교하는데 있다. 이를 위해 68명의 수퍼바이지들로부터 좋은 수퍼비전 관계의 특성을 추출하였으며, 유사성 평정을 위한 자극의 수를 줄이기 위해 추출된 특성들에 대해 군집분석을 실시하여 12개의 군집으로 진술문을 제작하였다. 52명의 수퍼바이지들이 12개의 진술문을 두 개씩 짝지어 유사성 평정을 실시하고 다차원척도분석(개인차 분석)과 회기분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과로, 수퍼바이지의 관점에서 좋은 수퍼비전 관계에 대한 인식 차원은 ‘대인관계 초점-교육 초점’, ‘수직적-수평적’, ‘자기성찰 초점-내담자 초점’로 확인되었다. 각 차원의 중요도를 비교하였을 때, ‘대인관계 초점-교육 초점’ 차원은 좋은 수퍼비전 관계 인식에서 가장 중요한 차원으로 확인되었으며, ‘자기성찰 초점-내담자 초점’ 차원은 상대적으로 중요도가 가장 낮았다. 또한 차원의 중요도를 수퍼바이지의 경력 수준별로 살펴보았을 때, 경력 수준이 높아질수록 ‘수직적-수평적’ 차원과 ‘자기성찰 초점-내담자 초점’의 차원의 중요도가 높아지는 것으로 나타났다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explored the underlying dimensions of a supervisee's perception of a good supervisory relationship and investigated the relative salience of each dimension according to the level of experience of the supervisee. The descriptions of a good supervisory relationship were solicited through a thought-listing method from a total of 68 supervisees. 52 participants rated the similarity of each pair of descriptions on a 7-point scale and the data was analyzed using ALSCAL individual difference scaling. Based on the fitness and interpretability, a 3-dimensional solution was selected. The three dimensions were interpreted as ‘interpersonal vs. educational’, ‘hierarchical vs. collegial’, and ‘self-reflection focus vs. client focus’. In terms of salience, ‘interpersonal vs. educational’ was the most salient dimension across all three groups. The second most salient dimension was ‘hierarchical vs. collegial’, and the ‘self-reflection focus vs. client focus’ was the least salient dimension. The ‘hierarchical vs. collegial’ and ‘self-reflection focus vs. client focus’ were found to be more salient with the increasing level of experience of the supervisee.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손은정, "수퍼비전 작업 동맹과 상담자 경력 수준이 역할 어려움과 수퍼비전 만족도에 미치는 영향" 한국상담심리학회 18 (18): 695-712, 2006

2 강지연, "수퍼바이지 수치심과 수퍼비전 만족도의 관계에서 작업동맹 및 자기개방의 매개효과 검증" 한국상담학회 7 (7): 1005-1021, 2006

3 한국상담심리학회, "상담심리사 규정" 상담심리사 수첩 2005

4 한국상담학회, "상담심리사 규정" 학회규정집 2005

5 Skovholt, T. M., "Themes in therapist and counselor development" 70 : 505-515, 1992

6 Ladany, N., "The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction with supervision" 77 : 447-455, 1999

7 Thibaut, J. W., "The social psychology of groups" Wiley 1959

8 Baker, D. E, "The relationship of the supervisory working alliance to supervisor and supervisee narcissism, gender, and theoretical orientation" Dissertation Abstracts International 1990

9 Ladany, N., "The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees' experience and role conflict and role ambiguity" 34 : 220-231, 1995

10 Skovholt, T. M., "The evolving professional self: Stages and themes in therapist and counselor development" John Wiley 1995

11 Stoltenberg, C. D., "Supervising counselors and therapists" Jossey-Bass 1987

12 Holloway, E. L., "Structures for the analysis and teaching of psychotherapy" Wiley 249-276, 1997

13 Bahrick, A. S., "Role induction for counselor trainee: Effects on the supervisory working alliance" 51 : 1990

14 Neufeldt, S. A., "Research on supervisor variables in psychotherapy supervision" Wiley 508-524, 1997

15 Patton, M. J., "Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training" 44 (44): 108-115, 1997

16 Goodyear, R. K., "Psychotherapy supervision and training" Wiley 83-108, 1997

17 Krause, A. A., "Perception of counselor supervision: An examination of Stoltenberg's model from the perspective of supervisor and supervisee" 35 : 77-80, 1988

18 Rosenblatt, A., "Objectionable supervising styles: Student views" 20 : 184-189, 1975

19 Takane, Y., "Nonmetric individual difference multidi mensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features" 42 : 7-67, 1977

20 Kruskal, J. B., "Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a nonmetric hypothesis" 29 : 1-27, 1964

21 Efstation, J. F., "Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision" 37 : 322-329, 1990

22 Shiffman, S. S., "Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and application" Academic Press 1981

23 Ellis, M. V., "Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review" Wiley 447-507, 1997

24 Carkkuff, R. R., "Helping and human relations" Holt, Rhinehart & Winston 1969

25 Pierce, R. M., "Graduate training of facilitative counselors: The effects of individual supervision" 17 : 210-215, 1970

26 Bernard, J. M., "Fundamentals of clinical supervision" Allyn & Bacon 2003

27 Karr, J. T., "Facilitation in supervision as related to facilitation in therapy" 16 : 263-268, 1977

28 Worthington, E. L., "Effective supervision as perceived by beginning counselors-in-training" 26 : 64-73, 1979

29 Heppner, P. P., "Differences among supervisees at different levels of training: Implications for a developmental model of supervision" 31 : 76-90, 1984

30 Carroll, M., "Counseling supervision: Theory, skills and practice" Cassell 1996

31 Ward, C. C., "Counseling supervision: A reflective model" 38 (38): 23-33, 1998

32 Tracey, T. G., "Concept mapping on therapeutic common factors" 13 (13): 301-413, 2003

33 Darcy, M., "Complementary approaches to individual differences using paired comparisons and multicultural counseling competence" 51 (51): 139-150, 2004

34 Bordin, E. S., "A working alliance model of supervision" 11 : 35-42, 1983

35 Hill, C. E., "A longitudinal analysis of changes in counseling skills during doctoral training in counseling psychology" 28 : 428-436, 1981