RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    문법 평가 내용 선정 원리에 대한 연구 -문법 평가 문항에 대한 학생들의 인식을 바탕으로- = A Study on the Principles of Content Selection in Evaluating Korean Grammar -Stand on Learners` awareness about the test of Korean grammar-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75521236

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to propose the principles of content selection in the evaluation of Korean Grammar. These days, lack of understanding for evaluating Korean Grammar has caused instability in grammatical area in the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test. So it is raised the need for developing specific principles for content selection in evaluating Korean Grammar. To study those principles, analyzing learners` awareness on grammars is required first. So I use a method of ethnography in this paper. In conclusion, the principles are classified into three categories. (1) First category is a grammatical thinking power centered-principle. it is well known that the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test has been centered on basic knowledge. It is not easy to evaluate learner`s grammatical ability with the exam. At this point, it is required to develop new tests that make is possible to encourage students to strengthen their grammatical thinking power. (2) Second factor is a learner centered-principle. Since subject of Korean grammar education is based on learners, and the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test also has been focused on learners, tests should be able to give meaningful feedbacks to learners. (3) The last category is an integration centered-principle. The process of revision of Korean language curriculum has been emphasized the importance of integration of all area. In the same manner, the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test should be designed to encourage integration among each test.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to propose the principles of content selection in the evaluation of Korean Grammar. These days, lack of understanding for evaluating Korean Grammar has caused instability in grammatical area in the government-sponsored sch...

    The purpose of this paper is to propose the principles of content selection in the evaluation of Korean Grammar. These days, lack of understanding for evaluating Korean Grammar has caused instability in grammatical area in the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test. So it is raised the need for developing specific principles for content selection in evaluating Korean Grammar. To study those principles, analyzing learners` awareness on grammars is required first. So I use a method of ethnography in this paper. In conclusion, the principles are classified into three categories. (1) First category is a grammatical thinking power centered-principle. it is well known that the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test has been centered on basic knowledge. It is not easy to evaluate learner`s grammatical ability with the exam. At this point, it is required to develop new tests that make is possible to encourage students to strengthen their grammatical thinking power. (2) Second factor is a learner centered-principle. Since subject of Korean grammar education is based on learners, and the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test also has been focused on learners, tests should be able to give meaningful feedbacks to learners. (3) The last category is an integration centered-principle. The process of revision of Korean language curriculum has been emphasized the importance of integration of all area. In the same manner, the government-sponsored scholastic aptitude test should be designed to encourage integration among each test.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.13 1.13 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.01 0.96 1.791 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼