RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    과학기술계 연구회의 기관평가 제도 발전 방안 = 산업기술연구회의 사례를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76255244

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This work firstly aims to analyse the current state and the actual exercise of institute evaluation system which conducts the evaluation of both research results and management contents of the member research institutes under the three research councils in S&T sector, and then to discuss the policy alternations in order to sort out the problems found through this analysis. For this purpose, the 2002 evaluation exercise of the KOCI(the Korea Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology). one of the three research councils in S&T sector, was selected as a case study. The result shows that the KOCl's current evaluation system has a lot of deficits of system itself and problems of implementation process in most evaluation components. For this reason, it seems that this system will not properly realise the initial mission and function to upgrade the national innovation system for future knowledge-based society as well as to produce the world class research outputs of member research institutes. So, I discussed the developments of the institute evaluation system of the research councils in S& T sector in the four perspectives of evaluation purpose, evaluation resources, evaluation performance and evaluation utilisation, in order to make it contribute the development of both the national innovation system and public science and technology activities. These recommendations mainly contain the transfer of evaluation purpose from the management system of member institutes to their development direction and research results, the reduction and rearrangement of evaluation objects in accordance with the changed evaluation purpose, the expansion of the input of evaluation resources such as manpower, unit and information, the extension of evaluation intervals from one year to a longer period, the adoption of non ranking system among member institutes in the process of evaluation synthesis and the diversification of evaluation utilisation.
    번역하기

    This work firstly aims to analyse the current state and the actual exercise of institute evaluation system which conducts the evaluation of both research results and management contents of the member research institutes under the three research counci...

    This work firstly aims to analyse the current state and the actual exercise of institute evaluation system which conducts the evaluation of both research results and management contents of the member research institutes under the three research councils in S&T sector, and then to discuss the policy alternations in order to sort out the problems found through this analysis. For this purpose, the 2002 evaluation exercise of the KOCI(the Korea Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology). one of the three research councils in S&T sector, was selected as a case study. The result shows that the KOCl's current evaluation system has a lot of deficits of system itself and problems of implementation process in most evaluation components. For this reason, it seems that this system will not properly realise the initial mission and function to upgrade the national innovation system for future knowledge-based society as well as to produce the world class research outputs of member research institutes. So, I discussed the developments of the institute evaluation system of the research councils in S& T sector in the four perspectives of evaluation purpose, evaluation resources, evaluation performance and evaluation utilisation, in order to make it contribute the development of both the national innovation system and public science and technology activities. These recommendations mainly contain the transfer of evaluation purpose from the management system of member institutes to their development direction and research results, the reduction and rearrangement of evaluation objects in accordance with the changed evaluation purpose, the expansion of the input of evaluation resources such as manpower, unit and information, the extension of evaluation intervals from one year to a longer period, the adoption of non ranking system among member institutes in the process of evaluation synthesis and the diversification of evaluation utilisation.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 연구분석틀의 설계
    • Ⅲ. 산업기술연구회의 기관평가 현황 분석
    • Ⅳ. 산업기술연구회의 기관평가 발전을 위한 정책대안 논의
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 연구분석틀의 설계
    • Ⅲ. 산업기술연구회의 기관평가 현황 분석
    • Ⅳ. 산업기술연구회의 기관평가 발전을 위한 정책대안 논의
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • 〈참고문헌〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼