RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    혼합형 학습 도입과 정착을 위한 대학의 조직문화와 기능에 관한 연구 = A Study on Organizational Culture and Functions of Educational Institutions for Implementation of Blended Learning into Higher Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75428834

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Blended learning combines the face-to-face lecture and online learning as a catalyst for the change and innovation in higher education. This study examines the organizational culture and operation of education institutes as major factors in the implementation of Blended Learning. The conditions for the successful integration of Blended learning into higher education are conducted in this work. We have chosen four Blended Learning courses, three undergraduate courses from R university and one course from a lifelong-learning university in France. For the holistic analysis on organizational culture and function for the implementation of Blended Learning, the data consist of the observations on instructional activities, the collection of emails and documents, the semi-structured interview with professors and administrators, and the surveys with students in these courses. We performed thematic analysis on the collected data according to six cultures and functions for the revolution of educational institutions, proposed by Gather Thurler. The results show that the organizational culture and function of R University plays an important role in performing Blended Learning not in the way to encourage its implementation but in a negative way. It implies that the transition of culture and function is critical for the drive the revolution of higher educations and the effort should be made by not only instructors but all members of institutions. New programs and strategies are required to organize and develop communities that shares visions and objectives for the change and innovation.
    번역하기

    Blended learning combines the face-to-face lecture and online learning as a catalyst for the change and innovation in higher education. This study examines the organizational culture and operation of education institutes as major factors in the implem...

    Blended learning combines the face-to-face lecture and online learning as a catalyst for the change and innovation in higher education. This study examines the organizational culture and operation of education institutes as major factors in the implementation of Blended Learning. The conditions for the successful integration of Blended learning into higher education are conducted in this work. We have chosen four Blended Learning courses, three undergraduate courses from R university and one course from a lifelong-learning university in France. For the holistic analysis on organizational culture and function for the implementation of Blended Learning, the data consist of the observations on instructional activities, the collection of emails and documents, the semi-structured interview with professors and administrators, and the surveys with students in these courses. We performed thematic analysis on the collected data according to six cultures and functions for the revolution of educational institutions, proposed by Gather Thurler. The results show that the organizational culture and function of R University plays an important role in performing Blended Learning not in the way to encourage its implementation but in a negative way. It implies that the transition of culture and function is critical for the drive the revolution of higher educations and the effort should be made by not only instructors but all members of institutions. New programs and strategies are required to organize and develop communities that shares visions and objectives for the change and innovation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "혼합형 학습(blended learning) 전략의 초 중등학교 현장 적용 가능성 탐색" 42 (42): 399-431, 2004

    2 "혁신과 변화(Innovation and Change)의 관점에서 본 교육정보화의 의미" 14 : 137-153, 1998

    3 "학교공동체의 개념적 분석과 그 구축 전략" 16 (16): 385-401, 1998

    4 "조직문화,단위학교 재구조화,직무만족도 간의 관계 연구" 21 (21): 213-235, 2003

    5 "변화하는 시대에 요구되는 학교장의 지도성" 13 (13): 145-168, 1995

    6 "대학교육혁신을 위한 e-learning 도입 및 운영의 장애요인 분석" 36 (36): 55-79, 2005

    7 "단위학교의 효율적 운영을 위한 학교 조직문화 특성에 관한 질적 탐색" 20 (20): 77-96, 2002

    8 "교장의 지도성 동인 및 변화촉진 유형과 교사의 교육혁신관심 관계 연구" 25 (25): 71-90, 2004

    9 "Vers une autonomie accrue des tablissements scolaires: Les nouveaux dfis du changement" Editions AFIDES 103-120, 1998

    10 "University of Chicago Press" 1975

    1 "혼합형 학습(blended learning) 전략의 초 중등학교 현장 적용 가능성 탐색" 42 (42): 399-431, 2004

    2 "혁신과 변화(Innovation and Change)의 관점에서 본 교육정보화의 의미" 14 : 137-153, 1998

    3 "학교공동체의 개념적 분석과 그 구축 전략" 16 (16): 385-401, 1998

    4 "조직문화,단위학교 재구조화,직무만족도 간의 관계 연구" 21 (21): 213-235, 2003

    5 "변화하는 시대에 요구되는 학교장의 지도성" 13 (13): 145-168, 1995

    6 "대학교육혁신을 위한 e-learning 도입 및 운영의 장애요인 분석" 36 (36): 55-79, 2005

    7 "단위학교의 효율적 운영을 위한 학교 조직문화 특성에 관한 질적 탐색" 20 (20): 77-96, 2002

    8 "교장의 지도성 동인 및 변화촉진 유형과 교사의 교육혁신관심 관계 연구" 25 (25): 71-90, 2004

    9 "Vers une autonomie accrue des tablissements scolaires: Les nouveaux dfis du changement" Editions AFIDES 103-120, 1998

    10 "University of Chicago Press" 1975

    11 "The transformation for the university into an institution of independent learning" Tayor & Francis Group 10-24, 2000

    12 "The Conceptual Foundations of Organizational Culture" 366-368, 1989

    13 "Suffit-il d'innover?" PUF 1985

    14 "Soutien du corps professoral dans une initiative d'enseignement avec les technologies de l'information et de la communication l'Universit de Montral" 2 (2): 2005

    15 "Schein의 조직문화적 개념 분석에 기초한 학교문화와 학교풍토의 개념적 관계" 21 (21): 161-178, 2003

    16 "Rethinking Learner Support in distance Education Change and continuity in an International Context" RoutledgeFalmer 2003

    17 "Restructuring Schools, Restructuring Teachers" Open University Press 1997

    18 "On n'apprend pas tout seul! Interactions scolaires et construction des connaissances" ESF diteur 1998

    19 "Mthode de recherche pour l'ducation" De Boeck Universit 1996

    20 "Logiques organisationnelles de l'cole, changement et innovation" De Boeck 185-216, 1996

    21 "Les arbres de connaissance" Editions de la Dcouverte 1996

    22 "Le rseau comme outil d'apprentissage organisationnel" 34 : 83-99, 2000b

    23 "La pdagogie l'cole des diffrences" ESF diteur 1996a

    24 "La notion d'innovation: figures majeurs et mtaphores oublis" De Boeck & Larcier 15-29, 1996

    25 "La mis en rseau europen des innovations: un exemple, l'observatoire europn des innovations en ducation et en formation" 34 : 29-40, 2000

    26 "La formation distance comme facteur de dveloppement de l'autoformatio: Utopie ou chance pour l'enseignement suprieur" Universit Rennes2 2004

    27 "L'entreprise et la gestion de l'innovation" Publi-Union 1972

    28 "L'autoformation face l'universit: ferment ou alibi" L'Harmattan 83-95, 2002

    29 "Innover au cœur de l'tablissement scolaire" 2000a

    30 "Innovation up close" Plenum 1984

    31 "Innovation et coopration entre enseignants: liens et limites" De Boeck 145-168, 1996

    32 "How to Design Effective Blended Learning" 2001

    33 "Evaluer les rformes scolaires, est-ce bien raisonnable" 19 (19): 53-98, 1996b

    34 "Entre innovation et formation ouverte, les nouveaux dispositifs de formation" 152 : 7-15, 2002

    35 "En finir avec les vieux dmon de l'cole, est-ce si simple? Antidote sociologique la pense positive" Hachette 85-130, 1996c

    36 "Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education Foundations for Success" Jossey-Bass 2003

    37 "Effect of Three Principal Styles on School Improvement" 22-32, 1984

    38 "Editorial:Distance education theory" 5 (5): 1-6, 1991

    39 "Economie et socit" Plon 1971

    40 "Dfinitions et fonctions de l'innovation pdagogique, le cas de la France de 1960 1994." De Boeck 15-29, 1996

    41 "Des machines et des hommes" L'Harmattan 1996

    42 "Des Cours par correspondance au "e-Learning"" PUF 2002

    43 "De l'usage social de la notion d'innovation une approche comprhensive de l'action" 34 : 57-68, 2000

    44 "Building Effective Blended Learning Programs" 43 (43): 51-54, 2003

    45 "Apprivoiser l'innovation" De Boeck 43-64, 2003

    46 "An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community" Corwin 1995

    47 "2005 교육정보화백서" 교육인적자원부, 한국교육학술정보원 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-04-20 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association Of Educational Information & Broadcasting -> Korea Association for Educational Information and Media KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.59 1.59 1.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2 1.96 2.299 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼