RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중등학교 과학 실험 수업에 대한 실험 목적·상호 작용·탐구 과정의 분석 = Analyses of the Aims of Laboratory Activity, Interaction, and Inquiry Process within Laboratory Instruction in Secondary School Science

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104661795

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to analyze laboratory instructions in a secondary school science with an analysisinstrument on science laboratory instruction. For its purpose, we used an instrument that analyzes three dimensions of thesecondary laboratory instructions. This analysis instrument was composed of 3 categories (the aim of the laboratoryactivity, interaction, and inquiry process) which are spread into 20 sub-categories, and its validity was checked by fourscience educators with factor of 0.89. For its purpose, 21 sessions of lab instructions were video-recorded and transcribed.According to the results, in the aims category, the instructions mainly focused on two aims; acquiring the declarativethe teachers’s questions could not gather the students’ divergent thinking, their directive instructions were centered aroundthemselves rather than giving opportunities for students to be centered within laboratory activities, and students’ interactionwere rarely shown. Therefore, interaction was classified as level I. In the inquiry process, presenting phenomenon orquestionings about the subjects were little observed, and students’ hypothesizing and predicting were almost nonexistent.Most of the activity designs within lab session were given from the teachers’ directions or worksheets, and students solelyfocused on data collecting and recording. Hence, inquiry process were classified level I.......... laboratory instruction, aim of laboratory activity, interaction, inquiry process. . : . ... ... .. .. .. .. ... ... .... .. ... .... ... . .. .. ..
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to analyze laboratory instructions in a secondary school science with an analysisinstrument on science laboratory instruction. For its purpose, we used an instrument that analyzes three dimensions of thesecondary laborato...

    The purpose of this study was to analyze laboratory instructions in a secondary school science with an analysisinstrument on science laboratory instruction. For its purpose, we used an instrument that analyzes three dimensions of thesecondary laboratory instructions. This analysis instrument was composed of 3 categories (the aim of the laboratoryactivity, interaction, and inquiry process) which are spread into 20 sub-categories, and its validity was checked by fourscience educators with factor of 0.89. For its purpose, 21 sessions of lab instructions were video-recorded and transcribed.According to the results, in the aims category, the instructions mainly focused on two aims; acquiring the declarativethe teachers’s questions could not gather the students’ divergent thinking, their directive instructions were centered aroundthemselves rather than giving opportunities for students to be centered within laboratory activities, and students’ interactionwere rarely shown. Therefore, interaction was classified as level I. In the inquiry process, presenting phenomenon orquestionings about the subjects were little observed, and students’ hypothesizing and predicting were almost nonexistent.Most of the activity designs within lab session were given from the teachers’ directions or worksheets, and students solelyfocused on data collecting and recording. Hence, inquiry process were classified level I.......... laboratory instruction, aim of laboratory activity, interaction, inquiry process. . : . ... ... .. .. .. .. ... ... .... .. ... .... ... . .. .. ..

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "타당도와 신뢰도." 학지사 162-, 2002

    2 "초중학생의 관찰 가설의 이해." 236-241, 2005

    3 "초중등학교 및 대학교의 실험 수업 유형분석." 60-, 2006

    4 "초등학교 5학년 자연과 실험 수업에 대한 문화기술적 연구." 35-46, 2000

    5 "초등 초임교사의 과학의 본성에 대한 신념과 과학 교수-학습 활동과의 관련성" 399-416, 2005b

    6 "중학교 과학 수업에서 학생들의 구조화된 상호작용을 유도하기 위한 상호동료교수전략의 효과." 465-471, 2005

    7 "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석." 1039-1048, 2004

    8 "중등학교 과학실험수업의 탐구수준을 평가하기 위한 도구개발 및 적용." 507-518, 2004

    9 "중등학교 과학교사들의 학습평가에 관한 실태조사." 101-111, 2000

    10 "좋은 수업방법에 대한 질적 분석 과학과를 중심으로." 207-220, 2002

    1 "타당도와 신뢰도." 학지사 162-, 2002

    2 "초중학생의 관찰 가설의 이해." 236-241, 2005

    3 "초중등학교 및 대학교의 실험 수업 유형분석." 60-, 2006

    4 "초등학교 5학년 자연과 실험 수업에 대한 문화기술적 연구." 35-46, 2000

    5 "초등 초임교사의 과학의 본성에 대한 신념과 과학 교수-학습 활동과의 관련성" 399-416, 2005b

    6 "중학교 과학 수업에서 학생들의 구조화된 상호작용을 유도하기 위한 상호동료교수전략의 효과." 465-471, 2005

    7 "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석." 1039-1048, 2004

    8 "중등학교 과학실험수업의 탐구수준을 평가하기 위한 도구개발 및 적용." 507-518, 2004

    9 "중등학교 과학교사들의 학습평가에 관한 실태조사." 101-111, 2000

    10 "좋은 수업방법에 대한 질적 분석 과학과를 중심으로." 207-220, 2002

    11 "예비 과학 교사가 탐구 점수표에 따라 분석한 현장 과학 수업." 561-573, 2003

    12 "실험실습법에 의한 수행평가가 중학생의 과학성취도 및 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향." 66-74, 2003

    13 "선언적 과학 지식의생성과정에 대한 과학철학적 연구 -귀납적 연역적 과정을 중심으로." 215-228, 2003

    14 "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석." 660-670, 2002

    15 "델파이 기법을 통한 실험목적 설정과 교사와학생들의 인식 비교." 78-, 2006

    16 "과학영재학교 교수활동에 관한 학생인식 및과학 수업에서 상호작용 유형." 30-40, 2005

    17 "과학 실험 수업 분석 도구 개발." 504-517, 2005a

    18 "a case for laboratory-basedinvestigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal" 26-32, 1995

    19 "Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learningfrom laboratory investigations in secondary science." 1065-1084, 1999

    20 "The nature of sciencein international science education standard documents.In McComas" KluwerAcademic Publishers 41-52, 1998

    21 "The laboratory in chemistry education Thirty years of experience with developments" 247-264, 2004

    22 "The effect of levelsof cooperation with physical science achievement.Journal of Research in Science Teaching" 167-181, 1994

    23 "The MIT Encyclopediaof Cognitive Science." 730-733, 1999

    24 "Syntheses of research on teacher’s questioning.Educational Leadership" 40-47, 1984

    25 "Success with investigations." 34-40, 2003

    26 "Scientist'conceptions of scientific inquiry Voices from thefront." 1-32, 2002

    27 "Science teaching and the development of thinking" Wadsworth Publishing Company 624-, 1995

    28 "Research on science laboratory activities In pursuit of better questions and answers toimprove learning. School Science and Mathematics" 403-418, 1990

    29 "Research on curriculum, teaching, and learning: The laboratory environment: An ecological perspective" 8 (8): 12-16, 1999

    30 "Providinghigh school chemistry students with opportunities todevelop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory Acase study." 47-62, 2004

    31 "Processes of scientific inquiry" 127-133, 1974

    32 "Practical work in school science Time for re-appraisal. In Wellington Practicalwork in science education" 3-15, 1998

    33 "Practical activity in Ethiopiansecondary physical sciences implications for policyand practice of the match between the intended andimplemented curriculum." 152 : 2000

    34 "One class, many world." 59-75, 1999

    35 "Learning in thelaboratory Some thoughts from the literature." 42-51, 2001

    36 "Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory." 93-108, 1998

    37 "International handbook of science education." Kluwer Academic Publishers 153-168, 1998

    38 "Helping behaviors and math achievementgain of students using cooperative learning. The ElementarySchool Journal" 285-297, 1994

    39 "Epistemologicallyauthentic inquiry in schools" C.A. and Malhotra 175-218, 2002

    40 "Envisionment in practical work helpingpupils to imagine concepts while carrying outexperiments. In Leach Practicalwork in school science." Kluwer Academic Publishers 60-74, 1999

    41 "Effects of hypothesisgeneration on hypothesis testing in rule discovery tasks." 1997

    42 "Doing with understanding Lessons from research onproblem and project-based learning." 271-311, 1998

    43 "Constructivist Approaches to scienceteaching. In Steffe" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. 385-400, 1995

    44 "Analysing discourse inthe science classroom. In Miller Thecontribution of research." Open University Press 126-142, 2000

    45 "Amap of the variety of labwork. Working Paper 1 fromthe European project Labwork in Science Education" -2005, 1998

    46 "Aims of laboratory teaching." 1-3, 2001

    47 "A guide for teaching andlearning. Washington" National Academy Press. 2000

    48 "A comparativestudy of attitudes to the aims of practical work inscience education in Egypt Korea and the UK." 1311-1324, 1999

    49 "A better approach to laboratory activities.The Science Teacher" 34-37, 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-19 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Earth Science Society KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.47 0.47 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.51 0.52 0.909 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼