RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    조직시민행동과 조직성과의 관계에 대한 비판적 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856690

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Does organizational citizenship behavior(OCB) promote organizational performance without fail? Previous researchers on OCB have maintained that such behaviors may stem from other-serving (altruistic) motives, have good influences upon employees, and consequently be critical for organizational efficiency and effectiveness. By and large, prior articles published in recent decades about OCB also have pointed to the merits and advantages of voluntary or extra-role activities extended in the workplace. Therefore, contemporary literature on OCB has been primarily focusing on the functional aspects (i. e. benefit-side) of the `good soldier syndrome`. In contrast to this standpoint we suggest a different view by illuminating the latent dysfunctions (i. e. cost-side) of OCB. This paper conceptually criticizes the underlying assumptions of theory on OCB and argues that prior researches have emphasized the partial (positive) features of such behaviors while generally disregarding the potentially negative connotations of them. By so doing, it is proposed here that OCB may not promote or even demote organizational performance if the benefits fail to outweigh the costs. Three overlooked presumptions that alternative causes and effects of OCB may exist in organization are as follows. First, OCB may originate from self-serving motives. Employees who engage in OCB might help coworkers, stay late, and so on, to enhance their rewards and/or self-images rather than only to support the organization itself. Second, OCB may bring about undesirable outcomes for individual workers. Employees who perform considerable OCB might experience role-overload and role-ambiguity, be susceptible to the conflict with their supervisor or resentment among peers, be left with less time to devote to their own tasks or personal lives, and so forth. Third, OCB may not or even negatively influence the major objective indexes of organizational performance as evidenced by few empirical studies. Organizations of which performance appraisal systems are inappropriate, formal functions are substituted (or hindered) by OCB or impression management, and OCBs are abused by employees and/or middle managers may have further difficulties in trying to improve their performances through OCB against all expectations. After giving due considerations to the practical and conceptual issues (e. g. OCB quality, reverse causality of OCB-performance, so-called group think phenomenon, level of analysis of performance, additional debates on behavioral motives, and the like) in the sphere of OCB research, we discussed a number of theoretical and managerial implications of this complementary viewpoint along with some significant agendas for future research in depth as well.
    번역하기

    Does organizational citizenship behavior(OCB) promote organizational performance without fail? Previous researchers on OCB have maintained that such behaviors may stem from other-serving (altruistic) motives, have good influences upon employees, and c...

    Does organizational citizenship behavior(OCB) promote organizational performance without fail? Previous researchers on OCB have maintained that such behaviors may stem from other-serving (altruistic) motives, have good influences upon employees, and consequently be critical for organizational efficiency and effectiveness. By and large, prior articles published in recent decades about OCB also have pointed to the merits and advantages of voluntary or extra-role activities extended in the workplace. Therefore, contemporary literature on OCB has been primarily focusing on the functional aspects (i. e. benefit-side) of the `good soldier syndrome`. In contrast to this standpoint we suggest a different view by illuminating the latent dysfunctions (i. e. cost-side) of OCB. This paper conceptually criticizes the underlying assumptions of theory on OCB and argues that prior researches have emphasized the partial (positive) features of such behaviors while generally disregarding the potentially negative connotations of them. By so doing, it is proposed here that OCB may not promote or even demote organizational performance if the benefits fail to outweigh the costs. Three overlooked presumptions that alternative causes and effects of OCB may exist in organization are as follows. First, OCB may originate from self-serving motives. Employees who engage in OCB might help coworkers, stay late, and so on, to enhance their rewards and/or self-images rather than only to support the organization itself. Second, OCB may bring about undesirable outcomes for individual workers. Employees who perform considerable OCB might experience role-overload and role-ambiguity, be susceptible to the conflict with their supervisor or resentment among peers, be left with less time to devote to their own tasks or personal lives, and so forth. Third, OCB may not or even negatively influence the major objective indexes of organizational performance as evidenced by few empirical studies. Organizations of which performance appraisal systems are inappropriate, formal functions are substituted (or hindered) by OCB or impression management, and OCBs are abused by employees and/or middle managers may have further difficulties in trying to improve their performances through OCB against all expectations. After giving due considerations to the practical and conceptual issues (e. g. OCB quality, reverse causality of OCB-performance, so-called group think phenomenon, level of analysis of performance, additional debates on behavioral motives, and the like) in the sphere of OCB research, we discussed a number of theoretical and managerial implications of this complementary viewpoint along with some significant agendas for future research in depth as well.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박종혁, "팀제 하에서 성과주의 보상시스템의 동기유발 효과: 과업특성의 조절효과를 중심으로" 30 (30): 87-119, 2006

    2 김경석, "조직시민행동의 하위차원에 대한 고찰: 연역적 분류 틀의 정립을 위한 탐색적 연구" 30 (30): 149-175, 2006

    3 김경석, "조직시민행동의 부정적 효과에 대한 연구: 소진의 매개역할을 중심으로" 30 (30): 91-120, 2006

    4 문형구, "조직시민행동(OCB) 연구에 대한 비판적 고찰: 한국에서의 연구를 중심으로" 35 (35): 609-643, 2006

    5 장용선, "조직문화 연구의 동향과 과제" 16 (16): 65-114, 2008

    6 서재현, "조직공정성이 조직후원인식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 상사에 대한 신뢰의 매개역할을 중심으로" 29 (29): 451-472, 2000

    7 박상언, "성과주의 인사제도 운용의 딜레마: 후지츠사 사례의 교훈" 15 (15): 135-174, 2007

    8 김동환, "성과주의 보상제도의 정착을 위한 탐색적 연구: 조직공정성 차원을 중심으로" 30 (30): 117-132, 2007

    9 양동훈, "보상제도가 협동행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 13 (13): 1-41, 2005

    10 한정화, "기업구성원의 가치특성과 자원봉사활동이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 28 (28): 1099-1131, 1999

    1 박종혁, "팀제 하에서 성과주의 보상시스템의 동기유발 효과: 과업특성의 조절효과를 중심으로" 30 (30): 87-119, 2006

    2 김경석, "조직시민행동의 하위차원에 대한 고찰: 연역적 분류 틀의 정립을 위한 탐색적 연구" 30 (30): 149-175, 2006

    3 김경석, "조직시민행동의 부정적 효과에 대한 연구: 소진의 매개역할을 중심으로" 30 (30): 91-120, 2006

    4 문형구, "조직시민행동(OCB) 연구에 대한 비판적 고찰: 한국에서의 연구를 중심으로" 35 (35): 609-643, 2006

    5 장용선, "조직문화 연구의 동향과 과제" 16 (16): 65-114, 2008

    6 서재현, "조직공정성이 조직후원인식에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 상사에 대한 신뢰의 매개역할을 중심으로" 29 (29): 451-472, 2000

    7 박상언, "성과주의 인사제도 운용의 딜레마: 후지츠사 사례의 교훈" 15 (15): 135-174, 2007

    8 김동환, "성과주의 보상제도의 정착을 위한 탐색적 연구: 조직공정성 차원을 중심으로" 30 (30): 117-132, 2007

    9 양동훈, "보상제도가 협동행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 13 (13): 1-41, 2005

    10 한정화, "기업구성원의 가치특성과 자원봉사활동이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 28 (28): 1099-1131, 1999

    11 권순식, "근로자의 공정성 지각과 조직시민행위: 고용형태가 미치는 영향에 대한 탐색적 연구" 13 (13): 1-34, 2005

    12 "orientations and reactions: Toward alternative human resource management practices" 51 : 571-588,

    13 Stamper, C. L., "Workstatus and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees" 22 : 517-536, 2001

    14 Perlow, L., "Who’s helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior" 23 : 345-361, 2002

    15 Shanock, L. R., "When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance" 91 : 689-695, 2006

    16 Dirks, K. T., "Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice" 87 : 611-628, 2002

    17 Aryee,S., "Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model" 23 : 267-285, 2002

    18 Cialdini, R. B., "Transgression altruism: A case for hedonism" 9 : 502-516, 1973

    19 Podsakoff, P. M., "Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors" 1 : 107-142, 1990

    20 Graen, G. B., "Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing" 9 : 172-208, 1987

    21 Hochschild,A.R., "The time bind" Metropolitan Books 1997

    22 Katz, D., "The social psychology of organizations" John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1966

    23 Wayne, S. J., "The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange" 87 : 590-598, 2002

    24 Ostroff, C., "The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis" 77 : 963-974, 1992

    25 Bolino, M. C., "The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict" 90 : 740-748, 2005

    26 Bergeron, D. M., "The paradox potential of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?" 32 : 1078-1095, 2007

    27 Bolino, M. C., "The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior" 40 : 229-246, 2004

    28 Popper, K. R., "The open society and its enemies" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1945

    29 Gouldner, A. W., "The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement" 25 : 161-178, 1960

    30 LePine, J. A., "The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis" 87 : 52-65, 2002

    31 Fandt, P. M., "The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically" 45 : 140-158, 1990

    32 Sitkin, S. B., "The legalistic organization: Definitions, dimensions, and dilemmas" 4 : 345-351, 1993

    33 Christensen,C.M, "The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail" Harvard Business School Press 1997

    34 Haworth, C. L., "The importance of instrumentality beliefs in the prediction of organizational citizenship behaviors" 59 : 64-75, 2001

    35 Barnard,C.I., "The functions of the executive" Harvard University Press 1938

    36 Allen, T. D., "The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment" 83 : 247-260, 1998

    37 Koys, D. J., "The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study" 54 : 101-114, 2001

    38 Mueller, C. W., "The degree to which justice is valued in the workplace" 13 : 1-24, 2000

    39 Paine, J. B., "The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: Some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations" 10 : 45-59, 2000

    40 Rioux, S. M., "The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis" 86 : 1306-1314, 2001

    41 Parker, S. K., "That is my job’: How employees’ role orientation affects their job performance" 60 : 403-444, 2007

    42 Chen, Z. X., "Test of a mediation model of perceived organizational support" 66 : 457-470, 2005

    43 Tesser, A., "Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don’t always help the one you like" 16 : 582-590, 1980

    44 Judge, T. A., "Social context of performance evaluation decisions" 36 : 80-105, 1993

    45 Greenberg, J., "Social comparison processes in organizations" 102 : 22-41, 2007

    46 Morrison, E. W., "Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective" 37 : 1543-1567, 1994

    47 Vigoda-Gadot,E., "Rewarding the boundaries of OCB? An empirical explanation of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace" 21 : 377-405, 2007

    48 Oyserman, D., "Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis" 128 : 3-72, 2002

    49 Ford, J. D., "Resistance to change: The rest of the story" 33 : 362-377, 2008

    50 Lam, S. S. K., "Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study" 23 : 1-18, 2002

    51 Grant,A.M., "Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference" 32 (32): 393-417, 2007

    52 Turnley, W. H., "Reexamining the effects of psychological contract violations: Unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators" 21 : 25-42, 2000

    53 Fisher, J. D., "Recipient reactions to aid" 91 : 27-54, 1982

    54 Allen, T. D., "Ratings of organizational citizenship behavior: Does the source make a difference?" 10 : 97-114, 2000

    55 Robinson, S. L., "Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior" 16 : 289-298, 1995

    56 Rousseau, D. M., "Psychological and implied contracts in organizations" 12 : 121-139, 1989

    57 Brief,A.P., "Prosocial organizational behaviors" 11 : 710-725, 1986

    58 Frese, M., "Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In Research in Organizational Behavior" JAI Press 133-187, 2001

    59 Kristof, A. L., "Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications" 49 : 1-49, 1996

    60 Gilbert, D. T., "Overhelping" 70 : 678-690, 1996

    61 Randall, M. L., "Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior" 20 : 159-, 1999

    62 Schnake, M., "Organizational citizenship: A review, proposed model, and research agenda" 44 : 735-759, 1991

    63 Walz, S. M., "Organizational citizenship behaviors: Their relationship to organizational effectiveness" 24 : 301-319, 2000

    64 Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research" 26 : 513-563, 2000

    65 Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness" 31 : 351-363, 1994

    66 Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: A review and suggestions for future research" 1993

    67 Organ,D.W., "Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome" Lexington Books 1988

    68 Smith, C. A., "Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents" 68 : 653-663, 1983

    69 Organ,D.W., "Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time" 10 : 85-98, 1997

    70 Farh, J. L., "Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China" 15 : 241-253, 2004

    71 Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance" 82 : 262-270, 1997

    72 Fisher, C., "On the dubious wisdom of expecting satisfaction to correlate with performance" 5 : 607-612, 1980

    73 Farh,J.L., "On the cross-cultural validity of Holland's model of vocational choices in Hong Kong" 52 : 425-440, 1998

    74 Tepper, B. J., "Moderators of the relationship between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees' attitudes" 89 : 455-465, 2004

    75 Lewicki, R. J., "Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions" 32 : 991-1022, 2006

    76 Barksdale, K., "Managerial ratings of in-role behaviors, organizational citizenship behaviors, and overall performance: Testing different models of their relationship" 51 : 145-155, 2001

    77 Roethlisberger,F.J., "Management and the worker" Wiley 1939

    78 Bass,B.M., "Leadership and performance beyond expectations" Free Press 1985

    79 Pillai, R., "Leadership and organizational justice: Similarities and differences across cultures" 30 : 763-779, 1999

    80 Ilies, R., "Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis" 92 : 269-277, 2007

    81 Tepper, B. J., "Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects" 86 : 789-796, 2001

    82 Bateman, T. S., "Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship" 26 : 587-595, 1983

    83 Wiesenfeld, B. M., "Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice" 50 : 1235-1253, 2007

    84 Rotter,J.B., "Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility" 35 : 1 -7, 1980

    85 Van der Vegt, G. S., "Interdependence in project teams" 139 : 202-214, 1999

    86 Hui, C., "Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasiexperiment" 85 : 822-828, 2000

    87 Adams, J. S., "Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology" Academic Press 267-299, 1965

    88 Moorman, R. H., "Individualism-collectivism as an individual predictor of organizational citizenship behavior" 16 : 127-142, 1995

    89 Farh, J. L., "Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationship in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality" Academy of Management Jo 2007

    90 Ertk, A., "Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of Turkish academicians: Mediating role of trust in supervisor on the relationship between organizational justice and citizenship behaviors" 22 : 257-270, 2007

    91 Vey, M. A., "In-role and extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: Which are we measuring?" 17 : 119-135, 2004

    92 Eastman, K. K., "In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior" 37 : 1379-1391, 1994

    93 Werner,J.M., "Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management" 10 : 3-24, 2000

    94 Farh, J. L., "Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society" 42 : 421-444, 1997

    95 IBM, "IBM 한국보고서" 한국경제신문사 2007

    96 DeVoe, S. E., "Hourly payment and volunteering: The effect of organizational practices on decisions about time use" 50 : 783-798, 2007

    97 Janis,I.L., "Groupthink: Psychological studies of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.)" Houghton-Mifflin 1982

    98 Collins,J.C., "Good to great: Why some companies make the leap and others don't" Harper-Collins Publishers 2001

    99 Deckop, J. R., "Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay for performance system" 42 : 420-428, 1999

    100 Arthur, J. B., "Gain-sharing as organizational learning: An analysis of employee suggestions over time" 44 : 737-754, 2001

    101 Lewin,K., "Frontiers in group dynamics" 1 : 5-41, 1947

    102 George, J. M., "Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship" 112 : 310-329, 1992

    103 Van Dyne, L., "Extra role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters)" 17 : 215-285, 1995

    104 Tekleab, A. G., "Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations" 48 : 146-157, 2005

    105 Borman, W. C., "Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Personnel selection in organizations" Jossey-Bass 71-98, 1993

    106 Blau,P.M., "Exchange and power in social life" John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1964

    107 Van Scotter, J. R., "Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards" 85 : 526-535, 2000

    108 MacKenzie, S. B., "Do citizenship behaviors matter more for managers than for salespeople?" 27 : 396-410, 1999

    109 Andrews, M. C., "Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support" 22 : 347-366, 2001

    110 Werner,J.M., "Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extra-role behaviors on supervisory ratings" 79 : 98-107, 1994

    111 Bettencourt, L. A., "Customercontact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors" 73 : 39-61, 1997

    112 Brockner, J., "Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice" 2001

    113 Tepper, B. J., "Consequences of abusive supervision" 43 : 178-190, 2000

    114 Vigoda-Gadot, E., "Compulsory citizenship behavior in organizations: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome" 36 : 77-93, 2006

    115 Van Dyne, L., "Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting" 21 : 3-23, 2000

    116 Organ, D. W., "Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior" 74 : 157-164, 1989

    117 Bolino, M. C., "Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations" 27 : 505-522, 2002

    118 Konovsky, M. A., "Citizenship and social exchange" 37 : 656-669, 1994

    119 Bolino,M.C., "Citizenship and impression management: good soldiers or good actors?" 24 : 82-98, 1999

    120 Colbert, A. E., "CEO Transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams" 51 : 81-96, 2008

    121 Shepperd, J. A., "Behavioral other-enhancement: Strategically obscuring the link between performance and evaluation" 60 : 79-88, 1991

    122 Graham.J.W., "An essay on organizational citizenship behavior" 4 : 249-270, 1991

    123 Meyer, J. P., "Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlations, and consequences" 61 : 20-52, 2002

    124 Zellars,K.L., "Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior" 87 : 1068-1076, 2002

    125 Organ, D. W., "A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis" 2 : 46-53, 1977

    126 Griffin, M. A., "A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts" 50 : 327-347, 2007

    127 Organ, D. W., "A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior" 48 : 775-802, 1995

    128 Bettencourt, L. A., "A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictions of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors" 86 : 29-41, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼