보안과 위험의 지각이 인터넷 뱅킹 재사용 의도에 미치는 영향

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서론
• II. 이론적 배경
• 2.1 위험의 개념
• 2.2 위험의 결과
• 2.3 위험의 원천 - 보안위험
• 2.4 통제신뢰 - 지각된 보안
• 2.5 사회적 영향 - 보안에 대한 사회적 인식
• III. 연구모형과 가설
• IV. 측정도구와 표본
• V. 자료분석
• 5.1 측정도구의 타당성 검증
• 5.2 경로분석
• VI. 시사점 및 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이민화, "인터넷뱅킹의 고객 수용에 관한 경험적 연구" 17 (17): 91-119, 2002

2 이웅규, "보안위험, 편리성, 사회적 영향이 인터넷 뱅킹 사용에 미치는 효과: 계좌이체와 잔액조회 서비스의 비교" 14 (14): 1-23, 2005

3 이건창, "국내 인터넷 뱅킹 사용자의 이용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인간 관계에 관한 실증연구" 12 (12): 191-212, 2002

4 Legris, P, "Why do people use information technology? a Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model" 40 (40): 191-204, 2003

5 McKnight, D.H, "What Trust Means in e-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology" 6 (6): 35-53, 2002

6 Triandis, H. C, "Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior" Lincoln 19791980pp.195-259.

7 Venkatesh, Viswanath, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

8 Davis, "User Acceptance of Computer Technology a Comparison of Two Theoretical Models" 35 : 982-1003,

9 Taylor S, "Understanding Information Technology Usage: a Test of Competing Model" 6 (6): 144-176, 1995b

10 Corbitt, B. J, "Trust and E Commerce: a Study of Consumer Perceptions" 2 (2): 203-215, 2003

11 Ratnasingham, Pauline, "Trading Partner Trust in Electronic Commerce Participation" 544-552, 2000

12 Tan, Y H, "Toward a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce" 5 (5): 61-74, 2001

13 Gefen, David, "The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: a Study of E-Commerce Adoption" 1 (1): 1-28, 2000

14 Cunningham, "The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior edited by Cox Graduate School of Business Administration" Harvard University Press 82-108,

15 Lai, Vincent S, "Technology Acceptance Model for Internet Banking: an Invariance Analysis" 43 : 373-386, 2005

16 Hutchinson, Damien, "Security for Internet Banking: a Framework" 16 (16): 64-73, 2003

17 Davis, "Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology" 13 : 319-340, 1989

18 Chin, W.W, "Overview of the PLS Method" 1997.

19 Claessens, Valentin Dem, "On the Security of Today’s Online Electronic Banking Systems" 21 (21): 257-269, 2002

20 Rousseau, D. M, "Not so Different After All: a Cross Discipline View of Trust" 23 (23): 383-404, 1998

21 Garbarino, Ellen, "Gender Differences in the Perceived Risk of Buying Online and the Effects of Receiving a Site Recommendation" 57 : 768-775, 2004

22 Stone, "Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline European Journal of Marketing" 27 : 39-50, 1993

23 Suh, B, "Effect of Trust on Customer Acceptance of Internet Banking" 1 (1): 247-263, 2002

24 Lim, Nena, "Consumers’ Perceived Risk: Sources versus Consequences" 2 : 216-228, 2003

25 Jarvenpaa, Sirrka L, "Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web" 1 (1): 59-88, 1997

26 Mitchell, Vincent Wayne, "Consumer Perceived Risk: Conceptualisations and Models" 33 (33): 163-196, 1999

27 Bauer, "Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking Proceeding of the 43rd Conference of the American Marketing Association" 389-398, 1960

28 Pavlou, Paul A, "Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model" 7 (7): 101-134, 2003

29 Taylor S, "Assessing IT Usage: the Role of Prior Experience" 19 (19): 561-570, 1995a

30 Mayer, R.C, "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust" 20 (20): 709-734, 1995

31 Venkatesh, Viswanath, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies" 46 (46): 186-204, 2000

32 Deutsch, "A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influence upon Individual Judgment Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology" 51 : 629-636, 1955

33 Gefen, David, "A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity using PLS Graph: Tutorial and Annotated example" 16 : 91-109, 2005

34 Dowling, "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk Journal of Consumer Research" 21 : 119-134,

35 King, William R, "A Meta Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model" 43 : 740-755, 2006