RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    드워킨의 법철학 사상 = Ronald Dworkin's Conception of Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75195692

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Ronald Dworkin is one of the most influential legal philosophers of the second half of 20th century. He shed light on the modal differences between principle and rule on the one hand and policy on the other. He also elucidated the right to win a case a party has even in a hard case that can be found on the basis of principle rather than policy or of any other discretion judges are supposed to have(so-called right thesis). He expanded his study to contemporary themes of political philosophy in which Rawls' conception of justice as fairness was largely discussed, and proposed an alternate approach to Rawls', that is, a conception of liberal equality without original position and veil of ignorance.
    In this article Dworkin's conception of law as integrity elaborated in his book Law's Empire is described and examined. He finds that law is conceived universally as a gravitational relationship of past political decisions upon the rights of parties to win their cases today, so he assumes that it may well be called a concept of law. And he analyses three attitudes or conceptions of the concept of law accepted in that way : Conventionalism, Dworkin's unique interpretation of Harhan version of legal positivism, is weak in that it ignores the persistent interests of lawyers in the past decisions even in hard cases. And legal pragmatism, Dworkin's interpretation of american legal realism, is not suitable for contemporary legal practiecs, because it has no reason to rule out so-called checker board rulings, that is, incoherent rules admitting contradictory decisions in a case. He proposes alternative conception of law as integrity, which conceives law, to speak figuratively, as a seamless web, as a totalilty of (political) decisions with principled consistency and coherence. He supposes constructive interpretation to weave integral or seamless texture of law, as chain novelists produce a coherent novel. On this theorctical basis, he illuminates several important philosophical and methodological issues of legal theory, such as finding decision in hard cases, justification of obligation to obey the law and the meaning and role of equality in jurisprudence.
    번역하기

    Ronald Dworkin is one of the most influential legal philosophers of the second half of 20th century. He shed light on the modal differences between principle and rule on the one hand and policy on the other. He also elucidated the right to win a case ...

    Ronald Dworkin is one of the most influential legal philosophers of the second half of 20th century. He shed light on the modal differences between principle and rule on the one hand and policy on the other. He also elucidated the right to win a case a party has even in a hard case that can be found on the basis of principle rather than policy or of any other discretion judges are supposed to have(so-called right thesis). He expanded his study to contemporary themes of political philosophy in which Rawls' conception of justice as fairness was largely discussed, and proposed an alternate approach to Rawls', that is, a conception of liberal equality without original position and veil of ignorance.
    In this article Dworkin's conception of law as integrity elaborated in his book Law's Empire is described and examined. He finds that law is conceived universally as a gravitational relationship of past political decisions upon the rights of parties to win their cases today, so he assumes that it may well be called a concept of law. And he analyses three attitudes or conceptions of the concept of law accepted in that way : Conventionalism, Dworkin's unique interpretation of Harhan version of legal positivism, is weak in that it ignores the persistent interests of lawyers in the past decisions even in hard cases. And legal pragmatism, Dworkin's interpretation of american legal realism, is not suitable for contemporary legal practiecs, because it has no reason to rule out so-called checker board rulings, that is, incoherent rules admitting contradictory decisions in a case. He proposes alternative conception of law as integrity, which conceives law, to speak figuratively, as a seamless web, as a totalilty of (political) decisions with principled consistency and coherence. He supposes constructive interpretation to weave integral or seamless texture of law, as chain novelists produce a coherent novel. On this theorctical basis, he illuminates several important philosophical and methodological issues of legal theory, such as finding decision in hard cases, justification of obligation to obey the law and the meaning and role of equality in jurisprudence.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.
    • Ⅱ.
    • Ⅲ.
    • Ⅳ.
    • Ⅴ.
    • Ⅰ.
    • Ⅱ.
    • Ⅲ.
    • Ⅳ.
    • Ⅴ.
    • Ⅵ.
    • Ⅶ.
    • Ⅷ.
    • Ⅸ.
    • Ⅹ.
    • Ⅺ.
    • Ⅻ.
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.81 0.81 0.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.68 0.998 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼