RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국 유아교육기관의 질적 분석기준 개발에 관한 연구 = A preliminary Study on the Criteria for quality Early childhood Programs in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60239571

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose or this study was to develop measurable criteria for quality early childhood programs. The criteria used in this study were based on the contents of accreditation criteria and procedures for early childhood programs. The criteria used to measure the quality of children 's experiences in programs seeking accreditation by the National Academy of Early Childhood Programs, a division of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. And the criteria were also developed through reviewing documents on evaluation and research literature on the quality early childhood education.
    The criteria address all early childhood program components (10): interactions among staff and children, curriculum, staff-parent interactions, staff qualifications and development, administration, staffing, physical environment, health and safety, nutrition and food service and evaluation.
    Questionnaires were administered to 72 supervisors who were in charge of early childhood education and 42 college professors who were in the department of early childhood education. Data also were collected in 382 early childhood education institutions, consisted of ratings on the criteria obtained from teachers. Each criterion was rated on a 3-point scale.
    The analysis was based on the data obtained from the questionnaire of supervisors and professors, and self-evaluation of teacher.
    It was found that the criteria were almost considered acceptable by supervisors and professors in early childhood education. The mean score was 2.72.
    The score of 10 items analysis ranged from 2.66 to 2.8 items having the lowest mean score (under 2.5) were in 5 items. These included the following components: curriculum (item 45), administration (item 75), health and safety (item 99, 100, 102).
    With respect to item analysis, item 23 was nonsignificantly discrimitive at 1% level.
    The score of self-evaluation of early childhood teachers was from 2.02 to 2.55. there were some differences in the subareas of the criteria. The component on interaction among staff and children and staff qualifications and development were significantly higher score than the rest of eight components.
    The criteria are to be utilized by individual institutions to self-monitor their won progress, by the supervisors to collect information and guide each institution for the promotion or early childhood education, and in overall, to enhance the quality of early childhood education in Korea. For more efficient use of the criteria, prospective evaluators should be trained on how to use them. Further investigation into the reliability and validity of the criteria is also needed.
    번역하기

    The purpose or this study was to develop measurable criteria for quality early childhood programs. The criteria used in this study were based on the contents of accreditation criteria and procedures for early childhood programs. The criteria used to m...

    The purpose or this study was to develop measurable criteria for quality early childhood programs. The criteria used in this study were based on the contents of accreditation criteria and procedures for early childhood programs. The criteria used to measure the quality of children 's experiences in programs seeking accreditation by the National Academy of Early Childhood Programs, a division of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. And the criteria were also developed through reviewing documents on evaluation and research literature on the quality early childhood education.
    The criteria address all early childhood program components (10): interactions among staff and children, curriculum, staff-parent interactions, staff qualifications and development, administration, staffing, physical environment, health and safety, nutrition and food service and evaluation.
    Questionnaires were administered to 72 supervisors who were in charge of early childhood education and 42 college professors who were in the department of early childhood education. Data also were collected in 382 early childhood education institutions, consisted of ratings on the criteria obtained from teachers. Each criterion was rated on a 3-point scale.
    The analysis was based on the data obtained from the questionnaire of supervisors and professors, and self-evaluation of teacher.
    It was found that the criteria were almost considered acceptable by supervisors and professors in early childhood education. The mean score was 2.72.
    The score of 10 items analysis ranged from 2.66 to 2.8 items having the lowest mean score (under 2.5) were in 5 items. These included the following components: curriculum (item 45), administration (item 75), health and safety (item 99, 100, 102).
    With respect to item analysis, item 23 was nonsignificantly discrimitive at 1% level.
    The score of self-evaluation of early childhood teachers was from 2.02 to 2.55. there were some differences in the subareas of the criteria. The component on interaction among staff and children and staff qualifications and development were significantly higher score than the rest of eight components.
    The criteria are to be utilized by individual institutions to self-monitor their won progress, by the supervisors to collect information and guide each institution for the promotion or early childhood education, and in overall, to enhance the quality of early childhood education in Korea. For more efficient use of the criteria, prospective evaluators should be trained on how to use them. Further investigation into the reliability and validity of the criteria is also needed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
    • 2. 연구 문제
    • II. 관련 연구
    • III. 연구 방법
    • I. 서론
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
    • 2. 연구 문제
    • II. 관련 연구
    • III. 연구 방법
    • IV. 결과 및 해석
    • 1. 유아교육과 교수와 장학사의 각 문항에 대한 평정 분석
    • 2. 유치원 교사의 자기평가 분석
    • 3. 문항 분석
    • V. 요약 및 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 부록 1. 유아 교육기관의 분석 기준
    • 부록 2. 유치원 교사의 자기-평가 평균점수
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼