RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국 사회복지정책 결정요인에 관한연구: 민간 정부시대의 복지정책을 중심으로 = A Study on the Determinants of Social Welfare Policy in Korea: In Ae Case of Korean Civil Governments

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105731358

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to ascertain the main determinants of social welfare policies in Korea during Kim Yeong Sam and Kim Dae Jung Government. This research also identifies the main characteristics of the Korean social welfare policies. In order to achieve these goals, I seek to find political, economic, and social factors that have impacts on the law-making and expenditure in the social welfare arena throughout the three different regime types: authoritarian, transitional, and democratic ones. And I compare and contrast the political, economic, and social factors, and determine which factors have had the most significant influences on the Korean social welfare policies. The political factors include the legitimacy of the respective regimes, elections, and power balance between the legislature and the administration. The economic factors constitute economic development. Finally, the social factors includes income distribution, labor union, and the frequency of strikes. This study focuses on the factors that have the most significant impact on law-making and expenditure in the social welfare arena. The major findings are as follows: First, the political factors appear to be the most important determinants on the decision making processes of social welfare in Korea. The respective regimes throughout the period under investigation have taken advantage of welfare policies in order to strengthen the legitimacy of their own regimes. So ironically, it was the authoritarian regimes that were the biggest proponent of the welfare policies.
    Second, the economic developments, to be sure, are the prerequisites for the social welfare policies. Nonetheless, the magnitudes of social welfare expenditures have not always been proportionate to the levels of economic development. All the regimes have not used the increased budgets for the social welfare although the economy has improved as compared to the previous years.
    Third, the social factors began to stand out recently. The social factors became increasingly important as it past authoritarian regimes to civil democratic ones. The democratic regimes got out of the legitimacy crisis unlike the previous authoritarian regimes and began to actively respond to the social welfare demands from the people.
    번역하기

    This study aims to ascertain the main determinants of social welfare policies in Korea during Kim Yeong Sam and Kim Dae Jung Government. This research also identifies the main characteristics of the Korean social welfare policies. In order to achieve ...

    This study aims to ascertain the main determinants of social welfare policies in Korea during Kim Yeong Sam and Kim Dae Jung Government. This research also identifies the main characteristics of the Korean social welfare policies. In order to achieve these goals, I seek to find political, economic, and social factors that have impacts on the law-making and expenditure in the social welfare arena throughout the three different regime types: authoritarian, transitional, and democratic ones. And I compare and contrast the political, economic, and social factors, and determine which factors have had the most significant influences on the Korean social welfare policies. The political factors include the legitimacy of the respective regimes, elections, and power balance between the legislature and the administration. The economic factors constitute economic development. Finally, the social factors includes income distribution, labor union, and the frequency of strikes. This study focuses on the factors that have the most significant impact on law-making and expenditure in the social welfare arena. The major findings are as follows: First, the political factors appear to be the most important determinants on the decision making processes of social welfare in Korea. The respective regimes throughout the period under investigation have taken advantage of welfare policies in order to strengthen the legitimacy of their own regimes. So ironically, it was the authoritarian regimes that were the biggest proponent of the welfare policies.
    Second, the economic developments, to be sure, are the prerequisites for the social welfare policies. Nonetheless, the magnitudes of social welfare expenditures have not always been proportionate to the levels of economic development. All the regimes have not used the increased budgets for the social welfare although the economy has improved as compared to the previous years.
    Third, the social factors began to stand out recently. The social factors became increasingly important as it past authoritarian regimes to civil democratic ones. The democratic regimes got out of the legitimacy crisis unlike the previous authoritarian regimes and began to actively respond to the social welfare demands from the people.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼