RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 다문화교육 내용선정의 쟁점과 과제 = Issues of Multicultural Education Contents in Korean Society

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to review or preview the issues in decision making on the contents of multicultural education in Korean society. Although the curriculum decision making process, and particularly in the case of multicultural education, is always a political process where diverse interest groups or ``cultural`` groups often conflict and struggle to be recognised and appreciated of their interests or cultural identities, in Korea, such conflicts among diverse cultural groups are not yet clearly articulated. This may be partly due to the fact that many minority groups in Korea have not yet collectively organized themselves to make their voices heard to the public. We first review some general issues of the multicultural education contents: issues on how to accommodate cultural identities of minority groups while providing common education for the unity of a society; issues arising from how to define the roles and scopes of ``multicultural education`` in relation to the ``general education`` or ``education for international understanding``; and issues raised from various types of multicultural education, such as ``education for adaptation of minorities``, ``education for identities of minorities``, and ``education for mutual understanding and anti-prejudice``. On the basis of this review on general issues, we suggest a framework for classifying issues of multicultural education contents, i.e. cases of voluntary inclusion, voluntary exclusion, non-voluntary inclusion, and non-voluntary exclusion. For each case, the nature of controversy differs according to whether the contents are related to ``common culture`` or ``minorities``, ``unique culture``. Thus, for example, voluntary exclusion (i.e. rejection) of common culture by a minority group raises different issues from the case of voluntary rejection of their own unique culture education program. Although the issues in the same category in this framework may be approached in different ways according to the nature of issue and according to the situations of each society, this framework provides us helpful devices to anticipate and prepare for the possible issues in curriculum decision making in the future in Korean society We also review some practical issues raised from various types of multicultural education currently conducted in Korea. Some of these issues, eg. the identity formation of the North Korean defectors, provoke a big challenge for Korean multicultural education development, but they also provide a chance for enhancing our theoretical understanding of the tasks of multicultural education. We conclude that multicultural education for the majority should go beyond mere ``understanding`` of minority cultures. It must include practical efforts to enable them to understand and confront the equity problems among diverse cultural groups within a society more actively, and to reflect on the fairness of their privileges and even to willingly give up them if necessary.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to review or preview the issues in decision making on the contents of multicultural education in Korean society. Although the curriculum decision making process, and particularly in the case of multicultural education, is ...

    The purpose of this study is to review or preview the issues in decision making on the contents of multicultural education in Korean society. Although the curriculum decision making process, and particularly in the case of multicultural education, is always a political process where diverse interest groups or ``cultural`` groups often conflict and struggle to be recognised and appreciated of their interests or cultural identities, in Korea, such conflicts among diverse cultural groups are not yet clearly articulated. This may be partly due to the fact that many minority groups in Korea have not yet collectively organized themselves to make their voices heard to the public. We first review some general issues of the multicultural education contents: issues on how to accommodate cultural identities of minority groups while providing common education for the unity of a society; issues arising from how to define the roles and scopes of ``multicultural education`` in relation to the ``general education`` or ``education for international understanding``; and issues raised from various types of multicultural education, such as ``education for adaptation of minorities``, ``education for identities of minorities``, and ``education for mutual understanding and anti-prejudice``. On the basis of this review on general issues, we suggest a framework for classifying issues of multicultural education contents, i.e. cases of voluntary inclusion, voluntary exclusion, non-voluntary inclusion, and non-voluntary exclusion. For each case, the nature of controversy differs according to whether the contents are related to ``common culture`` or ``minorities``, ``unique culture``. Thus, for example, voluntary exclusion (i.e. rejection) of common culture by a minority group raises different issues from the case of voluntary rejection of their own unique culture education program. Although the issues in the same category in this framework may be approached in different ways according to the nature of issue and according to the situations of each society, this framework provides us helpful devices to anticipate and prepare for the possible issues in curriculum decision making in the future in Korean society We also review some practical issues raised from various types of multicultural education currently conducted in Korea. Some of these issues, eg. the identity formation of the North Korean defectors, provoke a big challenge for Korean multicultural education development, but they also provide a chance for enhancing our theoretical understanding of the tasks of multicultural education. We conclude that multicultural education for the majority should go beyond mere ``understanding`` of minority cultures. It must include practical efforts to enable them to understand and confront the equity problems among diverse cultural groups within a society more actively, and to reflect on the fairness of their privileges and even to willingly give up them if necessary.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Todd,R, "Education in a multicultural society" Cassell 1991

    1 Todd,R, "Education in a multicultural society" Cassell 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼