카타르시스로서의 ‘이야기하기’ - 「소망」과 「나의 가장 나종 지니인 것」의 유사성과 차별성 : 카타르시스로서의 ‘이야기하기’ = ‘Story telling’ as a way of catharsis - The similarity and difference in 「A wish」 and  「My latest possession」

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Through this essay, the characteristic of ‘story telling’ is examined with the works Chae Mansik’s 「A wish」and Park Wansuh’s 「My latest possession」. As a result, it was found that there were similarity and difference between two works, in terms of solution of oppression, accomplishment of desire, structure of communication, catharsis process.
‘Story telling’ gives the speaker some solution for psychological oppression, and that is related to desire for achievement, and there are some treatment effect by the forming of sympathy to the hearer. Furthermore, social aspect that no person can contact with surroundings makes readers more intimate with the work. And the confession style for dramatic effect played an important role for intimacy.
This ‘story telling’ is a creative reappearance through the talk of the speaker, which composed of one way talking. And it’s a kind of communication structure, in which ‘I’ in 「A wish」speaks for her husband’s will and feeling to her supporting sister. In 「My latest possession」, there are sender and receiver who are sisters in law, the writer describes the grief of ‘I’ who lost her son, and the process of her gaining sympathy of her sister in law.
Here, ‘wife’ the speaker ‘I’ is a spokesman for her husband, who wants to recover ordinary life, at the same time, ‘I’ becomes a character that get to obtain positive life through straightforward of the grief.
The catharsis which is attained in the process of story telling is a share of the speaker. ‘I’ in 「A wish」speaks for her husband who felt catharsis through insanity or mental excretion, there are some weak points that his insanity bears another psychological oppression. But considering the last stage of Japanese imperialism, it can surely be apprehended; it is not simple madness but appearance of oppressed self-conscious of a colonial intellectual.
In「My latest possession」, ‘made-up I’ who couldn’t face the sadness and indulged in nihilistic falsehood, through the sorrowful tears, found out real feeling and can get sense of freedom. Here, it is certain that the tear is the same cause of catharsis, but there must be placed jealousy and envy on the basis of that.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. ‘이야기하기’를 통한 억압 해소
• 3. ‘이야기하기’의 소통구조
• 4. 카타르시스의 과정
• 5. 결어
• 참고문헌
• 〈abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이창재, "프로이트와의 대화" 학지사 2006

2 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" 두산동아 1999

3 민완기, "판소리와 ‘태평천하’의 상동성 연구" 한국외대 대학원 1985

4 차배근, "커뮤니케이션학 개론(상)" 세영사 1976

5 마광수, "카타르시스란 무엇인가" 철학과 현실사 1997

6 이대규, "채만식의 단편소설 ‘소망’의 분석과 해석" 13 : 1992

7 안숙원, "전화텍스트론" 115 : 1995

8 김성룡, "이야기하기의 치료적 효과" 한국고전문학교육학회 10 (10): 5-26, 2005

9 김후자, "의사소통론" 수문사 1987

10 김형국, "의미의 소통" 성균관대학교 출판부 1996

11 천병희, "아리스토텔레스,시학" 문예출판사 2002

12 김한식, "시간과 이야기 1" 문학과 지성사 1999

13 채만식, "소망 , 채만식 전집 7" 창작과 비평사 1989

14 손윤권, "박완서 자전소설 연구" 강원대학교 대학원 2004

15 한국문학평론가협회, "문학비평용어사전" 국학자료원 2006

16 김한식, "문학과 카타르시스 - 아리스토텔레스의 『시학』을 중심으로 -" 한국프랑스어문교육학회 18 (18): 441-466, 2004

17 김치수, "낭만적 거짓과 소설적 진실" 한길사 2002

18 박완서, "나의 가장 나종 지니인 것 , 환각의 나비" 푸르메 2006

19 조명기, "1930년대 말 지식인의 현실 적응 양상 연구 - 채만식의 <少妄>을 중심으로 -" 한국문학회 35 : 8-206, 2003

20 김행숙, ""주변인들"의 미적 의미 - 1920년대 초기 동인지를 중심으로 -" 우리어문학회 (19) : 79-111, 2002