RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Face validity of direct and semi-direct oral tests from test taker perspectives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75058073

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was conducted to compare face validity of a Computerized Oral Test (COT) with that of a Face-Tu-Face Interview (FTFI) from test taker perspectives. The semi-structured interview was used for data collection. The results found that the FTFI was seen as a more authentic and valid test in the eyes of the students, In other words, the FTFI has higher face validity than the COT from test taker perspectives. This study also suggests that interaction with a person was the main cause of the students'favorable attitudes to the FTFI, unfamiliarity with the COT format was one of the causes of less favorable attitudes to the COT, and comfort (or less nervousness) was the major cause of favorable attitudes to the COT. Based on these findings, it can be asserted that it may be possible to make students have more positive attitudes towards both tests by constructing the FTFI in a way that would make the students less nervous and by adding more interactive functions to, and raising familiarity with, the COT.
      번역하기

      This study was conducted to compare face validity of a Computerized Oral Test (COT) with that of a Face-Tu-Face Interview (FTFI) from test taker perspectives. The semi-structured interview was used for data collection. The results found that the FTFI ...

      This study was conducted to compare face validity of a Computerized Oral Test (COT) with that of a Face-Tu-Face Interview (FTFI) from test taker perspectives. The semi-structured interview was used for data collection. The results found that the FTFI was seen as a more authentic and valid test in the eyes of the students, In other words, the FTFI has higher face validity than the COT from test taker perspectives. This study also suggests that interaction with a person was the main cause of the students'favorable attitudes to the FTFI, unfamiliarity with the COT format was one of the causes of less favorable attitudes to the COT, and comfort (or less nervousness) was the major cause of favorable attitudes to the COT. Based on these findings, it can be asserted that it may be possible to make students have more positive attitudes towards both tests by constructing the FTFI in a way that would make the students less nervous and by adding more interactive functions to, and raising familiarity with, the COT.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼