한국판 Hamilton 우울증 평가 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구 = Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(K-HDRS)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objectives : The reliability and validity of the Korean version of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (K-HDRS) were examined in Korean patients depressive symptoms.
Methods : 33 inpatients and 70 outpatients diagnosed as major depressive disorder or depressive episode of bipolar I disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria were assessed with K-HDRS, Clinical Global Impression score (CGI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Montgomery-Aberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
Results : Internal consistency (Cronhach's alpha coefficeint=0.76) and interrater reliability (r=0.94, p<0.001) were Statistically significant. Principal axis factoring analysis revealed 4 factors that accounted for 50.4% of the total variance. The Correlations of K-HDRS with CGI, BDI and MADRS were 0.84, 0.54, 0.58 respectively.
Conclusion : These results showed that the K-HDRS could be a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of depressive Korean patients. The K-HDRS will be a useful tool for assessing depressive symptoms in Korea.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "해밀턴 우울증 평가척도의 요인구조" 12 : 3-16, 2003

2 "changes in scoresas a function of training and version used" The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 1 21-2 29, jaffectdisord1991

3 "What factors predict discrepancies betweenself and observer ratings of depression" 31 : 253-259, 1994

4 "Validityand reliability of the Chinese Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Br J Psychiatry" 152 : 660-664, May

5 "The relations between observer-rating and self-reportof depressive symptomatology" 5 (5): 350-360, 1993

6 "Style of verbal expression of emotional andphysical experiences:a study of depressed patients and normal controlsin China" 10 : 231-243, 1986

7 "Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the HamiltonDepression Rating Scale" 42 (42): 161-165, 2001

8 "Quantitativerating of depressive states" 51 : 161-170, 1975

9 "Psychopathologicaldimensions of depression:a factor study of the 17-itemHamilton depression rating scale in unipolar depressed outpatients" 68 : 41-47, 2002

10 "Psychological Testing" Macmillan 1982

11 "Olderage and the underreporting of depressive symptoms" 43 : 216-221, 1995

12 "Factorialstructure of the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale" 92 : 168-172, 1995

13 "Factorial structure and factor reliability of theHamilton Rating Scale for Depression" 78 : 113-120, 1988

14 "Factor study of the Hamilton Rating Scale forDepression and the Bech Melancholia Scale" 82 : 178-181, Scand1990

15 "Development of a rating scale for primary depressiveillness" 6 : 278-296, 1967

16 "Culture as a confounding variable" 158 : 133-, Med1991

17 "Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry" 892-913, 1989

18 "Center for CognitiveTherapy" The Beck Depression scale 1978

19 "Beck DepressionInventory의 표준화 연구-정상 집단을 중심으로(I)" 25 : 487-502, 1986

20 "AssessmentManual for psychopharmacology" 223-244, 1976

21 "Assessment of depression:a comparisonof rating scales" 11 : 245-253, 1986

22 "Assessing depression in primarycare practice with the Beck depression inventory and the Hamiltonrating scale for depression" 7 (7): 59-65, 1995

23 "A structured interview guide for Hamilton DepressionRating Scale" 45 : 742-747, 1978

24 "A rating scale for depression" 23 : 56-62, Psychiatry1960

25 "A new validation of theHamilton Rating Scale for Depression" 22 : 21-8, 1988

26 "A new depression scale designed to besensitive to change" 382-389, brjpsychiatry1979

27 "A comparison between the Hamilton RatingScale and the Beck Inventory in the measurement of depression" 128 : 486-489, 1976