RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지역별 난개발 수준의 측정 = Measuring Regional Sprawl with Macro Level Indices

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study explores various definitions of sprawl to derive proper indices to measure the level of sprawl in Korea. To perform this task, four indices are selected -- population-urbanized area growth ratio, population-road ratio, residential sprawl, and commuting time. The main findings are follows.First, since the main characteristics of residential development in Korea is high-density development, the American concept of sprawl represented by the single family low-density dispersed housing development does not fit in Korean case. Therefore, the density standard alone cannot be a proper sprawl index in Korea. Second, the Korean concept of sprawl is well fit with population-road ratio (infrastructure), urbanized area and commuting time standard of sprawl indices.Third, the sprawl areas spread over neighborhood cities and towns as time passes in the Capital region and the northern parts of Chungcheong region, along with other major metropolitan cities.
    번역하기

    This study explores various definitions of sprawl to derive proper indices to measure the level of sprawl in Korea. To perform this task, four indices are selected -- population-urbanized area growth ratio, population-road ratio, residential sprawl, a...

    This study explores various definitions of sprawl to derive proper indices to measure the level of sprawl in Korea. To perform this task, four indices are selected -- population-urbanized area growth ratio, population-road ratio, residential sprawl, and commuting time. The main findings are follows.First, since the main characteristics of residential development in Korea is high-density development, the American concept of sprawl represented by the single family low-density dispersed housing development does not fit in Korean case. Therefore, the density standard alone cannot be a proper sprawl index in Korea. Second, the Korean concept of sprawl is well fit with population-road ratio (infrastructure), urbanized area and commuting time standard of sprawl indices.Third, the sprawl areas spread over neighborhood cities and towns as time passes in the Capital region and the northern parts of Chungcheong region, along with other major metropolitan cities.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김재익, "도시성장관리" 보성각 2004

    2 정현욱, "대도시권역 난개발의 공간적 분포에 관한 연구" 대한국토ㆍ도시계획학회 38 (38): 7-20, 2003

    3 Galster, G., "Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring on Elusive Concept" Fannie Mae 2000

    4 Fulton, W., "Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S." Brookings Institution 2001

    5 Nelson, Arthur C., "Using Land Markets to Evaluate Urban Containment Programs" 52 : 156-171, 1986

    6 Nelson Arthur C., "Urban Containment and Central-City Revitalization" 70 : 411-425, 2004

    7 "USA Today, February 22, 2001"

    8 Sierra Club, "The Dark Side of the American Dream: The Costs and Consequences of Suburban Sprawl in Challenge to Sprawl Campaign, College Park, Maryland"

    9 Lopez, Russ, "Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, Distribution, and Trends" 38 (38): 325-355, 2003

    10 Daniels,T.L., "Opposite Approaches to Managing Urban Growth and Curbing Sprawl: A Synthesis" 60 (60): 229-243, 2001

    1 김재익, "도시성장관리" 보성각 2004

    2 정현욱, "대도시권역 난개발의 공간적 분포에 관한 연구" 대한국토ㆍ도시계획학회 38 (38): 7-20, 2003

    3 Galster, G., "Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring on Elusive Concept" Fannie Mae 2000

    4 Fulton, W., "Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S." Brookings Institution 2001

    5 Nelson, Arthur C., "Using Land Markets to Evaluate Urban Containment Programs" 52 : 156-171, 1986

    6 Nelson Arthur C., "Urban Containment and Central-City Revitalization" 70 : 411-425, 2004

    7 "USA Today, February 22, 2001"

    8 Sierra Club, "The Dark Side of the American Dream: The Costs and Consequences of Suburban Sprawl in Challenge to Sprawl Campaign, College Park, Maryland"

    9 Lopez, Russ, "Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, Distribution, and Trends" 38 (38): 325-355, 2003

    10 Daniels,T.L., "Opposite Approaches to Managing Urban Growth and Curbing Sprawl: A Synthesis" 60 (60): 229-243, 2001

    11 Allen, Jeffery, "Modeling and Prediction of Future Urban Growth in the Charleston Region of South Carolina: a GIS-based Integrated Approach" 8 (8): 2003

    12 Ewing, R., "Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact, A Report for Smart Growth America" 2004

    13 Heim, C.E., "Leapfrogging, Urban Sprawl, and Growth Management: Phoenix, 1950-2000" 60 (60): 245-283, 2001

    14 Romano, Bernadino, "Environmental Fragmentation Tendency: The Sprawl Index in A Paper Presented at ERSA 2004" Porto, Portugal 2004

    15 Pendall, R., "Do Land Use Controls Cause Sprawl in Environment and Planning B, 26:555-571"

    16 Kline, J.D., "Comparing States with and without Growth Management: Analysis based on Indicators with Policy Implications Comment" 17 : 349-355, 2000

    17 Nelson, Arthur C., "Comparing States with and without Growth Management Analysis based on Indicators with Policy Implications" 16 : 121-127, 1999

    18 Nelson A., "Assessing Growth management Policy Implementation" 13 (13): 241-259, 1996

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.9 0.9 0.9
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.85 0.87 1.157 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼