RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    창의성 교육: 반성적 접근 = Creative Education, Reflective Approach

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75043363

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to investigate and reflect the present situation of the creativity education and to suggest the better alternative approach ideas. The first investigative theme is to distinguish the meaning of correct answer from the solution. The correct answer has ready made selective and one or more choices. Contrastly the solution has various responses to the problem. With this reason the man who pursues the creative ideas in education request the possible solutions of the problem. In the line with this position the writer makes such issues as definition of creativity, cognitive structure of making creative ideas and teachers` executive ability. The second theme is to discriminate the creative education between the creativity education. The former approach is to teach creativity with use of idea pulling techniques such as brain storming and synectics so on. The latter approach is to teach creativity with the contents of creativity such as the components of creativity, heuristics of the creative ideas and creative products and so on. The writer proposes some wisdoms to the creativity educators. To overcome the present limitations the teacher must pull out new solutions of the problems with existing solutions and must draw out existing experiences and knowledge to the problems in order to make new ideas. The list of disturbing limitations to creativity education is as follows; over emphasizing teaching the knowledge and information compared with learners` learning activity, hasty conclusion to the experiences as ideas, discontinuous arrangement of worksheets, limited touch of the structure of the creativity and limited uses of representation forms. With these reasons there is no criteria to decide the better creativity education programs. this is the present critical limitation of creativity education. The writer suggests some practical ideas to improve creativity education as follows; to make standardized criteria of judging good worksheet and program, to design more relevant model of creativity education, to make more flexibility oriented policy for creativity education. In the time of 8th curriculum revision above discussed ideas can be used usefully.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to investigate and reflect the present situation of the creativity education and to suggest the better alternative approach ideas. The first investigative theme is to distinguish the meaning of correct answer from the solu...

    The purpose of this paper is to investigate and reflect the present situation of the creativity education and to suggest the better alternative approach ideas. The first investigative theme is to distinguish the meaning of correct answer from the solution. The correct answer has ready made selective and one or more choices. Contrastly the solution has various responses to the problem. With this reason the man who pursues the creative ideas in education request the possible solutions of the problem. In the line with this position the writer makes such issues as definition of creativity, cognitive structure of making creative ideas and teachers` executive ability. The second theme is to discriminate the creative education between the creativity education. The former approach is to teach creativity with use of idea pulling techniques such as brain storming and synectics so on. The latter approach is to teach creativity with the contents of creativity such as the components of creativity, heuristics of the creative ideas and creative products and so on. The writer proposes some wisdoms to the creativity educators. To overcome the present limitations the teacher must pull out new solutions of the problems with existing solutions and must draw out existing experiences and knowledge to the problems in order to make new ideas. The list of disturbing limitations to creativity education is as follows; over emphasizing teaching the knowledge and information compared with learners` learning activity, hasty conclusion to the experiences as ideas, discontinuous arrangement of worksheets, limited touch of the structure of the creativity and limited uses of representation forms. With these reasons there is no criteria to decide the better creativity education programs. this is the present critical limitation of creativity education. The writer suggests some practical ideas to improve creativity education as follows; to make standardized criteria of judging good worksheet and program, to design more relevant model of creativity education, to make more flexibility oriented policy for creativity education. In the time of 8th curriculum revision above discussed ideas can be used usefully.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼