국가 R&D 성과 기술이전의 결정요인에 관한 연구 - 개별 특허수준의 라이센싱을 대상으로 = The Determinants of Technology Transfer of Output from National R&D Program

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper tries to analyze the determinants of technology transfer of output from national R&D program at the level of individual patent,focusing on public organization such as universities and public research institute. Combining the information of the nature of patents and national R&D program, and the information of licensing, this paper try to distinguish three aspects of licensing, that is, whether the patent was licensed or not, the frequency of licensing, and the revenue through licensing patents. As a result, we can find out that the quality of patent such as the number of claims, the number of applicants was shown to be effective in enhancing the performance of licensing, and the volume of national R&D program can also effective. In addition, we can say that the cooperation between corporate entity and research institute is beneficial to the licensing performance, and it is necessary to enhance the monetary incentive toward inventor in order to enhance licensing performance. Lastly, it is needed to make it larger the portion of licensing revenue toward facilitator and TLO with an aim to enhance their skill of licensing negotiation in order to enhance licensing revenue.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

국가연구개발 성과의 효과적인 활용을 위해서는 이들 성과의 라이센싱에 대한체계적인 분석이 필요한데, 이를 위해, 본 연구는 개별 특허수준에서 국가연구개발 성과의 라이센싱 결정요인을 분석하였다. 분석데이터로는 두 가지 데이터베이스를 활용하였는데, 첫 번째는 2010년에 특허청이 조사한 국가 R&D 특허기술이전 실태조사의 결과를 활용하였으며, 두 번째 데이터는 2006년~2009년 사이에 국가연구개발사업을 통해 출원된 특허데이터를 활용하였고, 두 데이터베이스를 결합시켜 2006년~2009년 사이에 대학 및 공공연에서 출원된 특허 중에서 기술이전된 특허를 식별하고 이들 특허의 특성과 기술이전 사이의 관계를 분석하였다. 국가연구개발성과의 라이센싱 성과를 크게 라이센싱이 되었느냐의 여부와 라이센싱이 되었다면 몇 건 되었느냐 즉 일종의 회전율, 그리고 라이센싱을 통해 얼마만큼의 라이센싱수입을 획득했느냐로 구분하여 추정한 결과, 전반적으로청구항수, 등록여부와 출원인수 등의 특허의 가치를 나타내는 지표가 라이센싱 성과에 효과적인 것으로 나타났고, 대규모 연구자금 규모가 라이센싱 성과 제고에효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해, 연구개발주체측면에서는 출연연 및 국공립연구소가 대학보다 라이센싱 성과에 우위를 가지며, 기업-연구소의 협력방식이라이센싱 성과에 유리한 것으로 나타났고, 라이센싱의 성과를 제고하기 위해서는연구자에 대한 금전적인 인센티브를 강화해야 하고, 라이센싱 수입을 증대시키기위해서는 라이센싱 협상 등의 역량을 제고하기 위해 facilitator와 TLO에 대한배분을 확대시킬 필요가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 추기능, "특허의 경제적 수명의 결정요인에 관한 연구 : 갱신자료를 활용한 생존분석" 한국지식경영학회 11 (11): 65-81, 2010

2 임부루, "선행기술조사가 국가연구개발사업의 성과에 미치는 영향: 특허성과를 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 19 (19): 177-202, 2011

3 특허청, "국가 R&D 특허기술이전 실태 조사" 2010

4 Zuniga, "Who licenses out patents and why? Lessons from a business survey’" STI working paper 2009

5 OECD, "Valuation and Exploitation of Intellectual Property" OECD 2006

6 Sheehan, J., "Understanding Business Patenting and Licensing: Results of a Survey" OECD 2004

7 Anand, "The structure of licensing contracts" XLVIII : 103-135, 2000

8 Chesbrough Henry, "The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property" 45 (45): 33-58, 2006

9 Fosfuri, A., "The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing" 27 (27): 1141-1158, 2006

10 권혁욱, "The incidence of cross-licensing: A theory and new evidence on the firm and contract level determinants" ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV 35 (35): 1347-1361, 200611

11 Park, Kyoo-Ho, "The effectiveness of patent and the determinants of patenting activities in Korea" WIPO 2009

12 Park, Kyoo-Ho, "The determinants of licensing-in and out in Korean firms" 2010

13 Gans, J. S., "The Product Market and the Market For ideas: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs" 32 : 333-350, 2003

14 Gambardella, A., "The Market for Patents in Europe" 36 (36): 1163-1183, 2007

15 Lichtenthaler, U., "Technology commercialization intelligence: Organizational antecedents and performance consequences" 76 (76): 301-315, 2009

16 Vonortas, Nicholas S, "Technology Licensing, in OECD"

17 Gambardella, A., "Successes’ and ‘Failures’ in the Markets for Technology" 18 (18): 2002

18 Teece, D. J., "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy" 15 : 285-305, 1986

19 Arora, A., "Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing" 52 (52): 293-308, 2006

20 Lichtenthaler, E., "Organising the external technology exploitation process: current practices and future challenges" 27 (27): 255-271, 2004

21 Arora Ashish, "Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy" 10 (10): 2001

22 Arora, A., "Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy" MIT Press 2001

23 김영준, "Market structure and technology licensing: evidence from US manufacturing" ROUTLEDGE TAYLOR FRANCIS LTD 11 (11): 631-637, 200408

24 Grindley, P.C., "Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics" 39 (39): 8-41, 1997

25 Arora, A., "Licensing the Market for Technology" 52 (52): 277-295, 2003

26 Motohashi, Kazuyuki, "Licensing or not licensing?: An Empirical analysis on strategic use of patent in Japanese firms" 37 : 2008

27 Kollmer, H., "Licensing as a Commercialisation Strategy for New Technology-Based Firms" 33 : 1141-1151, 2004

28 Arora, A., "Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-how" 4 : 41-59, 1995

29 Giuri, Paola, "Inventors and invention processes in Europe: results from the PatVal-EU survey" 36 : 1107-1127, 2007

30 Pitkethly, "Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UKcompanies: patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities" 30 : 2001

31 Cassiman, B., "In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition" 52 (52): 68-82, 2006

32 Chesbrough Henry, "Emerging secondary markets for IP : US and Japan comparisons" Research report to national center for industrial property information and training(NCIPI), 2006

33 김영준, "Determinants of technology licensing: The case of licensors" John Wiley and Sons Ltd 27 (27): 235-249, 200606

34 Lichetenthaler, "Determinants of proactive and reactive technology licensing: a contingency perpective" 39 : 55-66, 2009