엔터테인먼트 전속계약에 따른 연예인의 법적보호 = Entertainers` Legal Protection according to Entertainment Exclusive Contracts

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Entertainment industry has gained ground, rapidly growing into future-oriented cultural enterprise. Accordingly as the scale of entertainment industry has been gradually increasing, entertainers who belong exclusively to enterprise agree to offer their services of entertainment activities while enterprises like broadcasting stations, and agencies agree to pay wages to entertainers in return, which is referred to as entertainer`s exclusive contract Types of entertainer`s exclusive contract can be divided according to contents of the contract and business type and such contracts have the character of nonstandard contract mixed with undertaking, employment, commission, etc. It also has the character of employment contract, in the aspect that entertainers should complete their labor under the order and supervision of enterprise and in the exclusive contracts made within such legal nature, most entertainers except for some celebrities, conclude exclusive contracts with enterprise in an unfair position. Regarding entertainer`s exclusive contract, unfairness of contracts has been continuously repeated and contracts under this situation contain articles where most entertainers are at a considerable disadvantage such as heavy compensation for damages, contract cancelation without precious ultimate procedure, compulsory appearance in promotional activities, comprehensive punishment article on breach of contract, excessive invasion of privacy, obscure contract period, contract transfer, no objection, unfair jurisdiction, grievance mediation share article, focus on agent convenience. Also entertainers are exposed to the exclusive contract unfairly according to principle of contract freedom and this causes entertainers to make an exclusive contract with an agent; that is, the power imbalance between them. Especially, most written contracts are aimed at unspecified entertainers and have the form of fixed terms and conditions and are considered to be policy terms. This kind of contract is regulated by the regulation law of terms and is aimed at control by Fair Trade Commission and a court. Therefore, a lawsuit and the regulation of Fair Trade Commission applied by regulating act of terms and trade commission regulations have performed as protective measures against a unfair exclusive contract. In spite of this legal control, as several problems such as unfair contracts have appeared regarding entertainer`s exclusive contract, Fair Trade Commission has legislated and officially announce 2 kinds of `standard exclusive contract for popular culture artists(singer, actor or actress) and suggested reformation(standard terms No. 10062, No.10063, 2009. 7. 6) regarding entertainer`s exclusive contract. Standard exclusive contracts mainly contain protection of harmful effects by long-term exclusive contracts, human right protection and status consolidation as a equal person concerned for entertainers, foundation establishment of entertainment industry development, existing precedent, enforcement cases of Fair Trade Commission and revision of terms law and this is considered to be positive in that it spreads transparent and fair contract in entertainment world based on the main contents. However, entertainment producer association has lodged a protest against standard exclusive contract in that it can limit operators` basic rights and have a lot of problems and it is difficult for entertainment industry to accept actually. However, concerning standard exclusive contracts, it is difficult to solve existing problems simultaneously, but it will be the stepping stone for decreased in unfair contract custom and mutual profit pursuit and bilateral trust between contract people concerned.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 하윤금, "한국 연예산업(entertainmernt industry)의 문제점과 새로운 대안" 2005

2 장재현, "채권법각론" 경북대출판부 2006

3 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2000

4 한상호, "전속출연계약. in: 민법주해 16권" 박영사 2000

5 한상호, "전속출연계약(상)" 한국사법행정학회 1989

6 연기영, "전속계약의 문제점과 과제" 민사법학회 2006

7 연기영, "전속계약상 연예인의 법적 보호문제" 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회 10 (10): 155-183, 2007

8 김동훈, "전속계약 및 기타 무명계약. in: 주석민법(채권각칙 5)" 한국사법행정학회 2002

9 최정렬, "전속 매니지먼트계약. in: 엔터테인먼트법(下)" 진원사 2008

10 장재현, "전문종사자 전속계약의 특질" 22 : 2005

11 권기덕, "전문인의 전속계약 −연예·체육인을 중심으로−" 경북대학교 2006

12 고시면, "일부 연예기획사 및 연예인과 관련된 노예계약서, 섹스·자위 비디오 혹은 성상납 등의 문제점과 그 개선방안에 관한 연구 −(가칭) ‘대중문화예술인(연기자 및 가수 등을 중심) 표준전속계약서’를 중심으로−" 한국사법행정학회 50 (50): 2009

13 김상겸, "예술의 자유와 엔터테인먼트의 법적 보호" 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회 9 : 9-32, 2006

14 구병문, "연예인전속계약과 그 법적보호" (19) : 2001

15 이승희, "연예인과 기획시간 전속매니지먼트계약의 불공정계약과 법제도적 개선방안에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 2009

16 정진명, "엔터테인먼트출연계약" 대한민사법학회 15 (15): 2007

17 이은영, "엔터테인먼트계약의 다양한 모습" 13 : 2002

18 정경석, "엔터테인먼트 비즈니스 분쟁사례집" 청림출판사 2004

19 이문행, "국내 연예 매니지먼트 회사의 사업 다각화 현황 (SM 엔터테인먼트, 사이더스 IHQ, 예당 엔터테인먼트를 중심으로)" 한국콘텐츠학회 9 (9): 208-218, 2009

20 장재옥, "專屬契約에 관한 小考- 연예인 전속매니지먼트계약을 중심으로 -" 중앙법학회 7 (7): 197-228, 2005

21 長尾治助, "出演契約と弟三者への役務提供" (229) : 1993

22 內藤篤, "エンタテインメント 契約法" 商事法務 2004

23 이성문, "'전속계약에 대하여', 한국방송연기자노동조합신문 4·5월호"