RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소비문화의 차원화 및 척도개발 -서울, 뉴욕, 스톡홀름의 소비자를 대상으로- = Dimensions and Measures of Consumer Culture -Focusing on Consumers in Seoul, New York, & Stockholm-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82728769

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is demanding to understand a consumer culture for academic interests and for the business success as well. This research tried to find dimensions and measures of consumer culture, which enable consumer culture researchers to conduct an empirical cross-cultural comparison study with elaborated tools. To develop an internationally applicable measures, authors selected three representative countries with consideration of the structural differences in economic level and economic system; south Korea, USA, and Sweden. While both USA and Sweden are included in the western culture and have a GDP of 40,000 US dollars, USA adopts a typical free market economy and Sweden is the representative of adjusted market economy. South Korea is originally embodied with the Asian culture and has a GDP of 20,000 US dollars. Consumer culture is a whole body of consumer lifestyle, which addresses all the consumptionrelated practices in our everyday lives. Through the historical review of consumer culture studies, authors found that the meaning of consumer culture expanded from the functional to the symbolic. While the original nature of consumption is to fulfill functional needs, more focus is putting on the capability to create a symbolic meaning of consumption in the modern consumer society. In addition, consumption includes social interaction. The meaning of consumption goods have a movable nature and function as media of communication. Social interaction through consumption can be divided into two categories; individual dimension such as hedonic symbol and social dimension such as social distinction. In the modern consumer society, consumption is more getting to imply the relations between peoples. Sustainable consumer culture, which is considered as one of the alternative consumer cultures, functions positively to the society and to the environment as well. Moreover, sustainable consumer culture implies interactions between individual and the society as well as interactions between individuals and the environment. Authors found that a consumer culture is an interaction of meaning via consumer goods, and herein, a meaning and an interactivity can be the main analysis unit. A consumer culture is classified into two dichotomies by meaning and interactivity; functional-symbolic and individualsocial. These two dichotomies are combined into a 2×2 cross-classification, and four-celled dimensions of consumer culture are produced; individual-functional, socio-functional, individualsymbolic and socio-symbolic. Each dimension has two sub-dimensions; ``economical efficiency`` and ``frugality``(individual-functional dimension), ``fun pursuing`` and ``self expression``(individualsymbolic dimension), ``approval by others`` and ``brand-good preference``(socio-symbolic dimension), and ``pro-social action`` and ``pro-environmental action``(socio-functional dimension). To validate the measure of consumer culture dimensions, an online survey was conducted in September 2006. The respondents were 1,500 consumers in their 20`s to 40`s of three metropolitan cities in Republic of Korea, USA and Sweden: Seoul, New York, and Stockholm. As a result of survey, a questionnaire with 20 questions was developed to measure consumer culture dimensions. A consumer culture was apparently dimensionalized by the meaning category, functional-symbolic with a high corelation between the dimensions in symbolic and in functional meaning category separately. In addition, a socio-functional dimension provides symbolic meaning to consumers with a positive relationship with symbolic meaning category. The symbolic nature of the consumption in the socio-functional dimension gives us an insight for the sustainable consumer culture expansion. If the symbolic meaning of the consumption in the socio-functional dimension can be discovered by country/cultural level, the sustainable consumption practices can be triggered voluntarily by consumers. This research contributes to the field of empirical cross-cultural consumer research by establishing the dimensions and by developing measures of a consumer culture. The dimensions and measures of consumer culture are expected to be a start point to understand of the each country`s consumer culture and compare consumer culture with another one. For further consumer culture study, a phenomenal research can be combined with to explore the origins and the roles of the meaning of consumer goods and the direction of the interaction through the consumption.
    번역하기

    It is demanding to understand a consumer culture for academic interests and for the business success as well. This research tried to find dimensions and measures of consumer culture, which enable consumer culture researchers to conduct an empirical cr...

    It is demanding to understand a consumer culture for academic interests and for the business success as well. This research tried to find dimensions and measures of consumer culture, which enable consumer culture researchers to conduct an empirical cross-cultural comparison study with elaborated tools. To develop an internationally applicable measures, authors selected three representative countries with consideration of the structural differences in economic level and economic system; south Korea, USA, and Sweden. While both USA and Sweden are included in the western culture and have a GDP of 40,000 US dollars, USA adopts a typical free market economy and Sweden is the representative of adjusted market economy. South Korea is originally embodied with the Asian culture and has a GDP of 20,000 US dollars. Consumer culture is a whole body of consumer lifestyle, which addresses all the consumptionrelated practices in our everyday lives. Through the historical review of consumer culture studies, authors found that the meaning of consumer culture expanded from the functional to the symbolic. While the original nature of consumption is to fulfill functional needs, more focus is putting on the capability to create a symbolic meaning of consumption in the modern consumer society. In addition, consumption includes social interaction. The meaning of consumption goods have a movable nature and function as media of communication. Social interaction through consumption can be divided into two categories; individual dimension such as hedonic symbol and social dimension such as social distinction. In the modern consumer society, consumption is more getting to imply the relations between peoples. Sustainable consumer culture, which is considered as one of the alternative consumer cultures, functions positively to the society and to the environment as well. Moreover, sustainable consumer culture implies interactions between individual and the society as well as interactions between individuals and the environment. Authors found that a consumer culture is an interaction of meaning via consumer goods, and herein, a meaning and an interactivity can be the main analysis unit. A consumer culture is classified into two dichotomies by meaning and interactivity; functional-symbolic and individualsocial. These two dichotomies are combined into a 2×2 cross-classification, and four-celled dimensions of consumer culture are produced; individual-functional, socio-functional, individualsymbolic and socio-symbolic. Each dimension has two sub-dimensions; ``economical efficiency`` and ``frugality``(individual-functional dimension), ``fun pursuing`` and ``self expression``(individualsymbolic dimension), ``approval by others`` and ``brand-good preference``(socio-symbolic dimension), and ``pro-social action`` and ``pro-environmental action``(socio-functional dimension). To validate the measure of consumer culture dimensions, an online survey was conducted in September 2006. The respondents were 1,500 consumers in their 20`s to 40`s of three metropolitan cities in Republic of Korea, USA and Sweden: Seoul, New York, and Stockholm. As a result of survey, a questionnaire with 20 questions was developed to measure consumer culture dimensions. A consumer culture was apparently dimensionalized by the meaning category, functional-symbolic with a high corelation between the dimensions in symbolic and in functional meaning category separately. In addition, a socio-functional dimension provides symbolic meaning to consumers with a positive relationship with symbolic meaning category. The symbolic nature of the consumption in the socio-functional dimension gives us an insight for the sustainable consumer culture expansion. If the symbolic meaning of the consumption in the socio-functional dimension can be discovered by country/cultural level, the sustainable consumption practices can be triggered voluntarily by consumers. This research contributes to the field of empirical cross-cultural consumer research by establishing the dimensions and by developing measures of a consumer culture. The dimensions and measures of consumer culture are expected to be a start point to understand of the each country`s consumer culture and compare consumer culture with another one. For further consumer culture study, a phenomenal research can be combined with to explore the origins and the roles of the meaning of consumer goods and the direction of the interaction through the consumption.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Miles, Steven, "현실세계와 사회이론" 일신사 2003

    2 백경미, "현대소비문화와 한국소비문화에 관한 고찰" 9 : 17-32, 1998

    3 전해은, "현대소비공간과 소비행동:동대문 쇼핑몰의 소비문화적 의미분석" 한국소비자학회 13 (13): 5-126, 2002

    4 최석진, "한?일 양국 신세대의 소비문화에 관한 비교연구 : 대학생들의 라이프스타일 특성 및 여가생활을 중심으로" 한국마케팅학회 4 (4): 4-96, 2002

    5 "한국조세연구원"

    6 손상희, "한국가계의 소비수준 및 표준, 지속가능한 생활양식의 실현 모색" 19 (19): 259-277, 2001

    7 "한국 통계청"

    8 권미화, "청소년소비자의 소비행동 합리성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 18 (18): 175-190, 2000

    9 김나연, "청소년 소비자의 동조적 상표선택 행동에 관한 연구-캐주얼 의류를 중심으로" 39 (39): 253-269, 2001

    10 함인희, "중산층의 정체성과 소비문화" 집문당 2001

    1 Miles, Steven, "현실세계와 사회이론" 일신사 2003

    2 백경미, "현대소비문화와 한국소비문화에 관한 고찰" 9 : 17-32, 1998

    3 전해은, "현대소비공간과 소비행동:동대문 쇼핑몰의 소비문화적 의미분석" 한국소비자학회 13 (13): 5-126, 2002

    4 최석진, "한?일 양국 신세대의 소비문화에 관한 비교연구 : 대학생들의 라이프스타일 특성 및 여가생활을 중심으로" 한국마케팅학회 4 (4): 4-96, 2002

    5 "한국조세연구원"

    6 손상희, "한국가계의 소비수준 및 표준, 지속가능한 생활양식의 실현 모색" 19 (19): 259-277, 2001

    7 "한국 통계청"

    8 권미화, "청소년소비자의 소비행동 합리성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 18 (18): 175-190, 2000

    9 김나연, "청소년 소비자의 동조적 상표선택 행동에 관한 연구-캐주얼 의류를 중심으로" 39 (39): 253-269, 2001

    10 함인희, "중산층의 정체성과 소비문화" 집문당 2001

    11 윤숙현, "자발적 단순성지향 생활양식(Voluntary Simplicity Life Style)에 기초한 환경운동의 방향" 대한가정학회 42 (42): 1-16, 2004

    12 Veblen, Thorstein, "유한계급론" 우물이 있는 집 2005

    13 서정희, "영남과 호남의 소비가치에 대한 탐색적 연구" 3 (3): 123-143, 2000

    14 손상희, "십대 초반 청소년의 아바타 소비행위를 통해 본 소비의 상징적 의미 연구" 한국소비자학회 15 (15): 77-102, 2004

    15 이기춘, "소비자학의 이해" 학현사 2005

    16 이성림, "소비자학 분야의 소비문화 연구에 대한 소고" 한국소비문화학회 9 (9): 127-149, 2006

    17 윤원아, "소비자의 집단주의-개인주의 성향에 관한 척도 개발" 11 (11): 1-14, 2000

    18 이승신, "소비자 그리고 소비문화" 신정 2004

    19 Baudrillard, Jean, "소비의 사회" 문예출판사 1992

    20 송인숙, "소비윤리의 내용과 차원정립을 위한 연구" 한국소비자학회 16 (16): 37-56, 2005

    21 손상희, "소비사회와 청소년 소비문화" 15 (15): 341-353, 1996

    22 Slator, Don, "소비문화와 현대성" 문예출판사 2000

    23 송인숙, "소비문화에 관한 연구의 현황과 전망" 대한가정학회 40 (40): 39-56, 2002

    24 오정우, "성, 성역할태도와 소비행동의 유형화" 서울대학교 대학원 2000

    25 박명희, "생각하는 소비문화" 교문사 2006

    26 황혜선, "상징적 소비성향의 척도개발 및 적용" 2006

    27 Hall, Edward, "문화를 넘어서" 한길사 1976

    28 서정희, "대학생 소비자의 물질주의 와 쾌락적.효용적 쇼핑가치 비교연구: 한국, 미국, 일본 대학생을 대상으로" 한국생활과학회 13 (13): 765-776, 2004

    29 김기옥, "내용분석을 통해 본 소비자학의 연구동향 1980-1999" 38 (38): 49-60, 2000

    30 Bourdieu, Pierre, "구별짓기 : 문화와 취향의 사회학 상, 하" 새물결 1995

    31 間間田孝夫, "消費社會論" 有斐閣 2001

    32 "ZenithOptimedia Global Facts & Forecasts 2006"

    33 Babin, Barry J., "Work and/or Fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

    34 Sheth, Jagdish N., "Why We Buy What We Buy" 22 (22): 159-170, 1991

    35 Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, "Voluntarily Simplicity Lifestyles and Energy Conservation" 8 (8): 243-252, 1981

    36 Natural Marketing Institute, "Understanding the LOHAS Market" Natural Marketing Institute 2005

    37 "UNDP 통계자료"

    38 Schor, Juliet B., "Toward a New Politics of Consumption" The Consumer Society Reader 446-462, 2000

    39 Douglas, Mary, "The World of Goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption" Penguin 1979

    40 Gabriel, Yiannis, "The Unmanageable Consumer: Contemporary Consumption and its Fragmentations" Sage Publications 1995

    41 Levy, Sidney J., "The Symbolic Analysis of Companies, Brands and Customer" University of Pittsburgh 1980

    42 Dittmar, Helga, "The Social Psychology of Material Possession: To Have is To Be" Harvester Wheatsheaf 1992

    43 Mukerjee,Radhakamal, "The Dimensions of Values" George Allen & Unwin 1964

    44 Holbrook, Morris B., "Some Preliminary Notes on Research in Consumer Esthetics, In Advances in Consumer Research, 7" Association for Consumer Research 1980

    45 Bloch, Peter H., "Shopping without Purchase: An Investigation of Consumer Browsing Behavior, In Advances in Consumer Research. 10" Association for Consumer Research 389-393, 1983

    46 Cheng, Hong, "Reflections of cultural values: A content analysis of chinese magazine advertisements from 1982 to 1992" 167-182, 1994

    47 Bond, Edward J., "Reason and Value" Cambridge University Press 1983

    48 Belk, Russell W., "Possessions and the extended self" 13 : 139-168, 1988

    49 Zepeda, Lydia, "Organic and local food consumer behavior” Alphabet Theory" 33 : 697-705, 2009

    50 "OECD Fackbook 2006"

    51 Giddens, Anthony, "Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age" Polity Press 1991

    52 Kluckhohn, Clyde, "Mirror for man: a relation of anthropology to modern life" Whittlesey House 1949

    53 Lastovicka, John L., "Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement" 26 (26): 85-98, 1999

    54 Triandis, Harry C., "Individualism and Collectivism" Westview Press 1995

    55 "IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2006"

    56 Holt, Douglas B., "How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices" 22 (22): 1-16, 1995

    57 Baylis, Charles A., "Grading, Values, and Choice" 67 (67): 485-501, 1958

    58 Keegan, Warren, "Global Marketing(4th edition)" Prentice-Hall 2005

    59 Blackorby, Charles, "Economic policy in a second-best environment" ⅩⅩⅢ (ⅩⅩⅢ): 748-771, 1990

    60 McCracken, Grant, "Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Charater of Consumer Goods and Activities" Indiana University Press 1988

    61 Tansey, Richard, "Cultural themes in Brazilian and U.S. auto ads: A crosscultural comparison" 19 (19): 30-40, 1990

    62 Ger, Guliz, "Crosscultural differences in materialism" 17 : 55-77, 1996

    63 Porter, Roy, "Consumption: disease of the consumer society, In Consumption and the World of Goods" Routledge 58-71, 1993

    64 Maignan, Isabelle, "Consumers' Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison" 30 : 57-72, 2001

    65 Holbrook, Morris B., "Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research" Routledge 1999

    66 Hirshman, Elizabeth C., "Commonality and Idiosyncrasy in Popular Culture: An Empirical Examination of the Layers of Meaning Concept, In Symbolic Consumer Behavior" Association for Consumer Research 1981

    67 Zepeda, Lydia, "Characteristics of Organic food shoppers" 39 : 17-28, 2007

    68 Ingelhart, Ronald, "Chapter 1. Value Systems: The Subjective Aspect of Politics and Economics, In Modernization and Postmodernization" Princeton University Press 1997

    69 "CIA Factbook"

    70 Elliott, Richard, "Brands as symbolic resources for construction of identity" 17 (17): 131-144, 1998

    71 Hirshman, Elizabeth C., "Attributes of Attributes and Layers of Meaning, In Advances in Consumer Research, 7" Association for Consumer Research 1980

    72 Mueller, Barbara, "An analysis of information content in standardized vs. specialized multinational advertisements" 22 : 23-39, 1991

    73 Browne, Michael W, "Alternative ways of assessing model fit" 21 : 230-258, 1992

    74 Trobe, Helen L., "A modified NEP/DSP Environmental Attitudes scale" 32 (32): 12-20, 2000

    75 Churchill, Gilbert A., "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs" XVI : 64-73, 1979

    76 Schecher, Len, "A Normative Conception of Value" Progressive Grocer 12-14, 1984

    77 Sproles, George B., "A Methodology for profiling consumer decision-making styles" 20 : 267-279, 1986

    78 Richins, Marsha L., "A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation" 19 (19): 303-316, 1992

    79 Hofstede, Geert, "A Case for Comparing Apples with Oranges ― International Dif- ferences in Values, In Values and attitudes across nations and time" Brill 16-29, 1998

    80 Merrill Lynch & Co., "2006 아시아태평양부자보고서"

    81 유미현, "20, 30대 여성의 수입유명브랜드 제품 소비행동" 대한가정학회 42 (42): 33-46, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼