RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      명화 차용 형태가 제품 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -제품 유형에 따른 차이를 중심으로- = The Influence of Art Infusion Type on Product Evaluation -Functional Product vs. Hedonic Product-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82490656

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In recent years, a new way of differentiating product design has emerged-better known as `masterpiece marketing,` this is a strategy where famous art pieces are borrowed on to product designs. Because the recent trends of well-being and LOHAS have encouraged the consumers` desires to enjoy culture and live a more opulent lifestyle, famous and notable paintings have grown to be more of approachable masterpieces to the public. As a strategy intended to develop a new consumerism, while still prioritizing customers` values and their satisfaction, companies have been drawn to this new type of marketing. The current consumption society has converted renowned art pieces from simply works of `high culture` to a further way of marketing, aimed to differentiate products and dominate the market. Though many products have had masterpieces applied to their designs and have been noticed for their marketability, there has been less systematic research done on the scientific background behind this marketing approach(Hagtvedt and Patrick 2008). In this study, we especially limited our focus to paintings called master-pieces that have passed the test of time and are considered classic exemplars of Western visual art such as Gustav Klimt`Kiss or Vincent van Gogh`s Cafe Terrace and investigated the influence of these kinds of visual arts on consumer`s aesthetic response and evaluation of the product. Eventually, the final aim of this study is to suggest the best way of using art in product design in real-market. For this empirical analysis, we collected examples of products which art works` image was used in real-market. Then, we could divide them into two art infusion types (direct vs. indirect), and two product types (functional vs. hedonic). In case of `direct art infusion type`, original art work is used to product as it is. While in `indirect art infusion type`, the image used to product design is something to modify original art work. This study compare the influence of art infusion type(direct vs. indirect) on aesthetic response(design attitude) and product evaluation between two product types: Hedonic and Functional products. We pretested 8 product categories with 47 participants to select stimuli which represented product type(functional vs. hedonic). The pretest revealed that a note book bag and an air conditioner were identified as a functional product, while a chocolate was perceived as a hedonic product. The art infusion type was between factor and the product type was within factor. One hundred and fifty-five participants were randomly assigned to conditions in 3(art infusion type: direct vs. control vs. indirect) between subject design. Independent variables were product type(functional vs. hedonic) and art infusion type(direct vs. indirect). Dependent variables were product evaluation and design attitude. All dependent variables were assessed using scales anchored by one and seven. The following are the summarized results of this study. The results of this experiment revealed that there was no main effect of the art infusion type or the product type on design attitude and product attitude, whereas an interaction effect between the art infusion type and the product type on design attitude and product effect was significant. Design attitude was predicted by measure of prototypicality distortion (Veryzer and Huchinson 1998). In functional products, the indirect art infusion type favorably influenced product attitude compared with the direct art infusion type. In this case, prototypicality distortion of the indirect art infusion type was lower than that of the direct art infusion type, leading to favorable evaluation of design. On the other hand, the indirect art infusion type favorably influenced product attitude compared with the indirect art infusion type in hedonic products. In hedonic product, prototypicality distortion of the indirect art infusion type was higher than that of the direct art infusion type. In conclusion, the results showed that the direct art infusion type favorably influenced design attitude compared with the indirect art infusion type. Finally, this study also showed that design attitude fully mediated the influence of the art infusion type on product evaluation in both hedonic and functional product case. This research demonstrates that the type of art infusion can have a substantial influence on consumer evaluations of products in the context of product design. However, many unresolved issues remain. For this reason, the phenomenon of art infusion is an area that merits further research from a theoretical perspective.
      번역하기

      In recent years, a new way of differentiating product design has emerged-better known as `masterpiece marketing,` this is a strategy where famous art pieces are borrowed on to product designs. Because the recent trends of well-being and LOHAS have enc...

      In recent years, a new way of differentiating product design has emerged-better known as `masterpiece marketing,` this is a strategy where famous art pieces are borrowed on to product designs. Because the recent trends of well-being and LOHAS have encouraged the consumers` desires to enjoy culture and live a more opulent lifestyle, famous and notable paintings have grown to be more of approachable masterpieces to the public. As a strategy intended to develop a new consumerism, while still prioritizing customers` values and their satisfaction, companies have been drawn to this new type of marketing. The current consumption society has converted renowned art pieces from simply works of `high culture` to a further way of marketing, aimed to differentiate products and dominate the market. Though many products have had masterpieces applied to their designs and have been noticed for their marketability, there has been less systematic research done on the scientific background behind this marketing approach(Hagtvedt and Patrick 2008). In this study, we especially limited our focus to paintings called master-pieces that have passed the test of time and are considered classic exemplars of Western visual art such as Gustav Klimt`Kiss or Vincent van Gogh`s Cafe Terrace and investigated the influence of these kinds of visual arts on consumer`s aesthetic response and evaluation of the product. Eventually, the final aim of this study is to suggest the best way of using art in product design in real-market. For this empirical analysis, we collected examples of products which art works` image was used in real-market. Then, we could divide them into two art infusion types (direct vs. indirect), and two product types (functional vs. hedonic). In case of `direct art infusion type`, original art work is used to product as it is. While in `indirect art infusion type`, the image used to product design is something to modify original art work. This study compare the influence of art infusion type(direct vs. indirect) on aesthetic response(design attitude) and product evaluation between two product types: Hedonic and Functional products. We pretested 8 product categories with 47 participants to select stimuli which represented product type(functional vs. hedonic). The pretest revealed that a note book bag and an air conditioner were identified as a functional product, while a chocolate was perceived as a hedonic product. The art infusion type was between factor and the product type was within factor. One hundred and fifty-five participants were randomly assigned to conditions in 3(art infusion type: direct vs. control vs. indirect) between subject design. Independent variables were product type(functional vs. hedonic) and art infusion type(direct vs. indirect). Dependent variables were product evaluation and design attitude. All dependent variables were assessed using scales anchored by one and seven. The following are the summarized results of this study. The results of this experiment revealed that there was no main effect of the art infusion type or the product type on design attitude and product attitude, whereas an interaction effect between the art infusion type and the product type on design attitude and product effect was significant. Design attitude was predicted by measure of prototypicality distortion (Veryzer and Huchinson 1998). In functional products, the indirect art infusion type favorably influenced product attitude compared with the direct art infusion type. In this case, prototypicality distortion of the indirect art infusion type was lower than that of the direct art infusion type, leading to favorable evaluation of design. On the other hand, the indirect art infusion type favorably influenced product attitude compared with the indirect art infusion type in hedonic products. In hedonic product, prototypicality distortion of the indirect art infusion type was higher than that of the direct art infusion type. In conclusion, the results showed that the direct art infusion type favorably influenced design attitude compared with the indirect art infusion type. Finally, this study also showed that design attitude fully mediated the influence of the art infusion type on product evaluation in both hedonic and functional product case. This research demonstrates that the type of art infusion can have a substantial influence on consumer evaluations of products in the context of product design. However, many unresolved issues remain. For this reason, the phenomenon of art infusion is an area that merits further research from a theoretical perspective.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 John Berger, "이미지:시각과 미디어" 동문선 1990

      2 김요한, "예술의 정의" 서광사 2007

      3 성영신, "신(新)기술 제품 디자인에 대한 소비자 반응 연구" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 4 (4): 1-23, 2003

      4 최낙환, "속성정보가 유발하는 긍정적 감정이 제품평가에 미치는 영향에 대한 기분의 조절역할" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 39-65, 2008

      5 이유재, "브랜드 동일시, 브랜드 감정, 브랜드 로열티의 관계에 관한 연구- 실용적 제품과 쾌락적 제품간의 비교" 한국방송광고공사 10 (10): 101-125, 2004

      6 Barbin, Barry J., "Work and/or Fun:Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

      7 Margolis, Joseph, "What,After All,Is a Work of Art? Lectures in the Philosophy of Art" Pennsylvania State University Press 1999

      8 Garvin, David A., "What Does ‘Product Quality’ Really Mean?" 26 : 25-43, 1984

      9 Averill, James R., "Voyages of the heart:Living an emotionally creative life" Free Press 1992

      10 Feldman, Edmund Burke, "Varieties of Visual Experience, 4th ed." Harry N. Abrams 1992

      1 John Berger, "이미지:시각과 미디어" 동문선 1990

      2 김요한, "예술의 정의" 서광사 2007

      3 성영신, "신(新)기술 제품 디자인에 대한 소비자 반응 연구" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 4 (4): 1-23, 2003

      4 최낙환, "속성정보가 유발하는 긍정적 감정이 제품평가에 미치는 영향에 대한 기분의 조절역할" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 39-65, 2008

      5 이유재, "브랜드 동일시, 브랜드 감정, 브랜드 로열티의 관계에 관한 연구- 실용적 제품과 쾌락적 제품간의 비교" 한국방송광고공사 10 (10): 101-125, 2004

      6 Barbin, Barry J., "Work and/or Fun:Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

      7 Margolis, Joseph, "What,After All,Is a Work of Art? Lectures in the Philosophy of Art" Pennsylvania State University Press 1999

      8 Garvin, David A., "What Does ‘Product Quality’ Really Mean?" 26 : 25-43, 1984

      9 Averill, James R., "Voyages of the heart:Living an emotionally creative life" Free Press 1992

      10 Feldman, Edmund Burke, "Varieties of Visual Experience, 4th ed." Harry N. Abrams 1992

      11 Peracchio, Laura A., "Using Stylistic Properties of Ad Pictures to Communicate with Consumers" 32 : 29-40, 2005

      12 Bagozzi, Richard P., "The Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior" 2002

      13 Mackenzie, Scott B., "The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness:A Test of Competing Explanation" 33 : 130-143, 1986

      14 Pye, David, "The Nature and Aesthetics of Design" Van Nostrand 1978

      15 Baron, Reuben M., "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual,Strategic and Statistical Considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

      16 Veryzer, Robert W. JR., "The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs" 24 (24): 374-394, 1998

      17 Berkowitz, Marvin, "The Influence of Shape on Product Preferences" Association for Consumer Research 559-, 1987

      18 Yamamoto, Mel, "The Impact of Product Aesthetics on the Evaluation of Industrial Products" 11 : 309-324, 1994

      19 Hoffman, Barry, "The Fine Art of Advertising" Stewart, Tabori and Chang 2002

      20 Holbrook, Morris B., "The Experiential Aspect of Consumption:Concepts,Methods,and Proposition" 9 (9): 132-140, 1982

      21 Kemler Nelson, Deborah G., "The Effect of Intention on What Concepts Are Acquired" 23 : 734-759, 1984

      22 Goodrich, Kristina, "The Design of the decade:Quantifying Design impact over ten years" 5 : 47-55, 1994

      23 Chaudhuri, Arjun, "The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance:The Role of Brand Royalty" 65 (65): 81-93, 2001

      24 Jones, Peter L., "Taste Today" Pergamon Press 1991

      25 Hollins, Bill, "Successful Product Design" Butter worth 1990

      26 Holbrook, Morris B., "Some Preliminary Notes on Research in Consumer Esthetics" Association for Consumer Research 1980

      27 Nussbaum, Bruce, "Smart Design" 102-117, 1988

      28 Bitner, Mary Jo, "Servicescapes:The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees" 56 (56): 57-71, 1992

      29 Bloch, Peter H., "Seeking the ideal Form:Product Design and Consumer Response" 59 : 16-29, 1995

      30 Palmeri, Thomas J., "Recognition Memory for Exceptions to the Category Rule" 21 (21): 248-568, 1995

      31 Bruce, Margaret, "Putting Design into the Picture:The Role of Product Design in Consumer Purchase Behavior" 30 (30): 147-162, 1988

      32 Margolin, Victor, "Product Appeal and the Aura of Art, in Objects and Images: Studies in Design and Advertising" University of Industrial Arts 198-207, 1992

      33 Koffka, Kurt, "Principles of Gestalt Psyciology" Harcourt, Brace 1935

      34 Homa, Donald, "On the Nature of Categories, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation" Academic Press 49-94, 1984

      35 Berlyne, Daniel E., "Novelty,Complexity,and Hedonic Value" 8 (8): 279-286, 1970

      36 Bazerman, Max H., "Negotiating with Yourself and Losing:Understanding with Yourself and Losing:Understanding and Managing Conflicting Internal Preferences" 23 (23): 225-241, 1998

      37 Woll, Stanley, "Memory Discrimination for information Typical and Atypical of Person Schemata" 1 (1): 287-310, 1982

      38 Batra, Rajeev, "Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes" 2 (2): 159-170, 1990

      39 Dickson, Peter R., "Market Segmentation,Product Differentiation,and Marketing Strategy" 51 : 1-10, 1987

      40 Whitney, Daniel E., "Manufacturing by Design" 83-90, 1988

      41 Gordon, Peter C., "Implicit Learning and Generalization of the ‘Mere Exposure’ Effect" 45 (45): 495-500, 1983

      42 Lawson, Bryan, "How Designers Think" East view Editions 1983

      43 Koster, Joan B., "Growing Artist:Teaching the Art To Young Children" Delmar Thomson 2009

      44 Tansey, Richard G., "Gardner's Art Through the Ages" Harcourt Brace 1996

      45 Shrum, Wesley M., "Fringe and Fortune:The Role of Critics in High and popular Art" Prinston University Press 1996

      46 Lombardo, Sergio, "Event and Decay of the Aesthetic Experience" 9 (9): 123-141, 1991

      47 Tan, Ed S., "Emotion, Art, and the Humanities, in Handbook of Emotions" Guilford Press 2000

      48 Kreuzbauer, Robert, "Embodied cognition and new product design:Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization" 22 : 65-76, 2005

      49 Zhu, Rui(Juliet), "Distinguishing Between the Meanings of Music:When Background Music Affects Product Perceptions" 42 (42): 333-345, 2005

      50 Kotler, Philip, "Design:A Powerful but Neglected Strategic Tool" 5 (5): 16-21, 1984

      51 Holt, Steven, "Design, the Ninth Principle of Excellence:The Product Half of the Business Equation" 4 : 2-4, 1985

      52 Dumaine, Brian, "Design That Sells and Sells and....." 86-94, 1991

      53 Lauer, David A., "Design Basics" Holt, Rinehart, and Winston 1979

      54 Holbrook, Morris B., "Cue Configurality in Esthetic Responses, in Symbolic consumer behavior, Amm Arbor" Association for Consumer Research 1981

      55 Oatley, Keith, "Creative expression and communication of emotion in the visual and narrative arts, in Handbook of Affective Science" Oxford Press 2003

      56 Tripat, Gill, "Convergent Products:What Functionalities Add More Value to the Base?" 72 (72): 46-62, 2008

      57 Medin, Douglas L., "Context Theory of Classification Learning" 85 (85): 207-238, 1978

      58 Zeithaml, Valarie A., "Consumer Perceptions of Price,Quality,and Value:A Means-End Model and' Synthesis of Evidence" 52 : 2-22, 1988

      59 Rosch, Eleanor, "Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories" 104 (104): 192-233, 1975

      60 Mano, Heim, "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience:Evaluation,Feeling and Satisfaction" 20 (20): 451-466, 1993

      61 Holbrook, Morris B., "Artistic Creation,Artworks,and Aesthetic Appreciation:Some Philosophical Contributions to Nonprofit Marketing" 1 : 1-54, 1985

      62 Hagtvedt, Henrick, "Art and the brand:The role of visual art in enhancing brand extendibility" 18 (18): 212-222, 2008

      63 Martorella, Rosanne, "Art and Business:An International Perspective on Sponsorship" Praeger 1996

      64 Hagtvedt, Henrick, "Art Infusion:The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products" 45 (45): 389-389, 2008

      65 Schirmacher, Robert, "Art & Creativity Development for Young Children" Delmar Publishing 2009

      66 Ward, Thomas B., "Analytic and Holistic Modes of Learning Family-Resemblance Concepts" 15 (15): 42-54, 1987

      67 Holbrook, Morris B., "An Empirical Approach to Representing Pattern of Consumer Tastes,Nostalgia,and Hierarchy in the Market for Cultural Products" 13 (13): 55-71, 1995

      68 Loken, Barbra, "Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality" 17 (17): 111-126, 1990

      69 Kunst-Willson, William R., "Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized" 207 (207): 557-558, 1980

      70 Wolff, Janet, "Aesthetics and Sociology of Art" George Allen and Unwin 1988

      71 Fiske, Susan T., "A Continuum of Impression Formation from Category-Based to Individuating Processes:Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation" Academic Press 1-74, 1990

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼