RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공공시설 입지의 공정성 = 뉴욕시 공정분배 원칙과 시사점

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60254432

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the philosophical basis of siting public facilities to increase fairness and the possibility of total quantity control of locally unwanted public facility. For this, first, the utilitarianism pursuing ‘the greatest happiness of the greatest number’, the ‘justice as fairness’ by John Rawls and the concept of ‘Environmental Justice; are reviewed. Second, the fairness in siting public facilities among Korean local municipalities and the possibility of total quantity control of locally unwanted public facility are investigated. Third, as a case study, the New York City’s fair share criteria is studied and its implications to Korea are deduced. New York’s fair share criteria gives us following recommendations. Korean version of fair share criteria need to be institutionalized. And before the site selection, all stakeholders should be informed and consulted early in the siting process.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the philosophical basis of siting public facilities to increase fairness and the possibility of total quantity control of locally unwanted public facility. For this, first, the utilitarianism pursuing ‘the...

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the philosophical basis of siting public facilities to increase fairness and the possibility of total quantity control of locally unwanted public facility. For this, first, the utilitarianism pursuing ‘the greatest happiness of the greatest number’, the ‘justice as fairness’ by John Rawls and the concept of ‘Environmental Justice; are reviewed. Second, the fairness in siting public facilities among Korean local municipalities and the possibility of total quantity control of locally unwanted public facility are investigated. Third, as a case study, the New York City’s fair share criteria is studied and its implications to Korea are deduced. New York’s fair share criteria gives us following recommendations. Korean version of fair share criteria need to be institutionalized. And before the site selection, all stakeholders should be informed and consulted early in the siting process.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼