RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    평생교육의 목적으로서의 삶의 질의 개념에 대한 시론적 접근

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103460999

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the discourse on lifelong education, lifelong education is almost uniformly suggested to contribute finally to the sustenance and improvement of the quality of life. Nevertheless, the concept of the quality of life has not reached any firm definition, either socially or academically. In fact, it seems to be viewed and understood in even conflictual ways. Where there is no consensus on the fundamental goals of lifelong education, the practice of lifelong education, in such situation, may go astray. Such situation can hardly accelerate the embodiment of the ideal of lifelong education. The quality of life thus needs to be elaborated and defined fully enough to guide and support the diverse forms of practice in lifelong education.
    This study attempts to generate an overarching theory that critically reviews each major view of the quality of life. First, in the concept of quality of life suggested by the UNESCO, both the individual good and the social good are the primary concepts to be sought for. The aim of lifelong education in such sense is to realize the both noble goods. Second, in the idea of quality of life promoted by most governmental bodies, no other condition than the economy is regarded as the basis of the quality of life. The lifelong education in this assumption is assumed to strengthen overall economic conditions of both individual and collective life. Third, the quality of life defined from the perspective of the individuals, the main ingredient is the level of satisfaction with the everyday living as an experience perceived by the each individual. In this perception, the lifelong education is expected to help increase the felt happiness with the process as well as the outcome of the daily living.
    Encompassing these reviews, this study suggest that the quality of life be defined as the concept that consists of three main components, i.e. the basic condition or standard of living, the direction or ideal of life, and the individual or personal participation and freedom of choice. The quality of life in the suggested concept then asks for corresponding theory and practice of lifelong education. That is, the main avenues of lifelong education need to be exploited fully and properly. What is more, the sufficient harmony ought to be pursued among general liberal education, vocational and professional education, social civic education.
    번역하기

    In the discourse on lifelong education, lifelong education is almost uniformly suggested to contribute finally to the sustenance and improvement of the quality of life. Nevertheless, the concept of the quality of life has not reached any firm definiti...

    In the discourse on lifelong education, lifelong education is almost uniformly suggested to contribute finally to the sustenance and improvement of the quality of life. Nevertheless, the concept of the quality of life has not reached any firm definition, either socially or academically. In fact, it seems to be viewed and understood in even conflictual ways. Where there is no consensus on the fundamental goals of lifelong education, the practice of lifelong education, in such situation, may go astray. Such situation can hardly accelerate the embodiment of the ideal of lifelong education. The quality of life thus needs to be elaborated and defined fully enough to guide and support the diverse forms of practice in lifelong education.
    This study attempts to generate an overarching theory that critically reviews each major view of the quality of life. First, in the concept of quality of life suggested by the UNESCO, both the individual good and the social good are the primary concepts to be sought for. The aim of lifelong education in such sense is to realize the both noble goods. Second, in the idea of quality of life promoted by most governmental bodies, no other condition than the economy is regarded as the basis of the quality of life. The lifelong education in this assumption is assumed to strengthen overall economic conditions of both individual and collective life. Third, the quality of life defined from the perspective of the individuals, the main ingredient is the level of satisfaction with the everyday living as an experience perceived by the each individual. In this perception, the lifelong education is expected to help increase the felt happiness with the process as well as the outcome of the daily living.
    Encompassing these reviews, this study suggest that the quality of life be defined as the concept that consists of three main components, i.e. the basic condition or standard of living, the direction or ideal of life, and the individual or personal participation and freedom of choice. The quality of life in the suggested concept then asks for corresponding theory and practice of lifelong education. That is, the main avenues of lifelong education need to be exploited fully and properly. What is more, the sufficient harmony ought to be pursued among general liberal education, vocational and professional education, social civic education.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 노진철, "현대사회의 성찰적 자기기술로서의 삶의 질" 경북대학교 사회과학대학 1-36, 1997

    2 이훈구, "행복의 심리학-주관적 안녕감" 범문사 1997

    3 박종민, "한국인의 삶의 질: 전체, 개별영역 및 비교기준" 아세아문제연구소 45 (45): 141-464, 2002

    4 이현송, "한국인의 삶의 질: 객관적 차원을 중심으로" 31 (31): 269-301, 1997

    5 신도철, "한국인의 삶의 질 연구 : 주관적 지표에 의한 분석" (5) : 26-47, 1981

    6 한국보건사회연구원, "한국의 사회지표 체제개편 연구(1): 총괄편" 한국보건사회연구원 1996

    7 김의철, "한국 사회에서 삶의 질을 구성하는 요인들에 대한 탐구" 한국사회문제심리학회 12 (12): 1-28, 2006

    8 김종서, "평생교육개론" 교육과학사 2000

    9 이영균, "지역주민의 삶의 질에 관한 연구" 한국정책과학학회 11 (11): 223-250, 2007

    10 이태종, "지역주민의 ‘삶의 질’ 분석평가: 경주시민을 대상으로" 12 (12): 75-92, 2000

    1 노진철, "현대사회의 성찰적 자기기술로서의 삶의 질" 경북대학교 사회과학대학 1-36, 1997

    2 이훈구, "행복의 심리학-주관적 안녕감" 범문사 1997

    3 박종민, "한국인의 삶의 질: 전체, 개별영역 및 비교기준" 아세아문제연구소 45 (45): 141-464, 2002

    4 이현송, "한국인의 삶의 질: 객관적 차원을 중심으로" 31 (31): 269-301, 1997

    5 신도철, "한국인의 삶의 질 연구 : 주관적 지표에 의한 분석" (5) : 26-47, 1981

    6 한국보건사회연구원, "한국의 사회지표 체제개편 연구(1): 총괄편" 한국보건사회연구원 1996

    7 김의철, "한국 사회에서 삶의 질을 구성하는 요인들에 대한 탐구" 한국사회문제심리학회 12 (12): 1-28, 2006

    8 김종서, "평생교육개론" 교육과학사 2000

    9 이영균, "지역주민의 삶의 질에 관한 연구" 한국정책과학학회 11 (11): 223-250, 2007

    10 이태종, "지역주민의 ‘삶의 질’ 분석평가: 경주시민을 대상으로" 12 (12): 75-92, 2000

    11 하혜수, "지방정부의 정책평가 산출모형에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 1996

    12 서승환, "서울시 자치구별 생활환경의 질에 관한 비교분석" 서울시정개발연구원 6 (6): 21-38, 2005

    13 김진욱, "서울과 OECD 국가의 도시 간 삶의 질 비교 분석" 1 (1): 3-18, 2000

    14 현오석, "생활의 질의 측정에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 326-343, 1976

    15 정유성, "새로운 교육문화 사회운동론: 사람ㆍ삶ㆍ되살림" 한울 1998

    16 임희섭, "삶의 질의 개념적 논의.한국행정연구원" 한국행정연구원 5 (5): 5-18, 1996

    17 한국행정연구원, "삶의 질에 있어서의 현황과 과제" 한국행정연구원 5 (5): 1996

    18 조명한, "삶의 질에 대한 국가간 비교" 집문당 1998

    19 김영종, "삶의 질과 행정서비스" 한국지방자치학회보 9 (9): 161-183, 1997

    20 이승종, "삶의 질과 주민참여" 1997

    21 박현옥, "삶의 질 향상을 위한 일상생활환경의 만족도에 관한 연구 -충남 홍성군을 중심으로-" 한국생활과학회 15 (15): 83-94, 2006

    22 한성덕, "삶의 질 지표체계에 관한 연구" 대구대학교 사회과학연구소 4 (4): 425-491, 1998

    23 김병관, "삶의 질 연구의 필요성과 기존 연구의 검토" 11-24, 1995

    24 한표환, "도시지표의 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구" 한국지방행정연구원 1995

    25 최열, "대도시 삶의 질과 토지 이용간의 상관분석" 36 (36): 161-182, 2001

    26 금기반, "‘삶의 질’ 측정을 위한 기초 연구. 대전광역시 도시계획 상임연구단" (9) : 63-91, 2003

    27 Chaturvedi,S.K, "What's Important for Quality of Life to Indians - In Relation to Cancer" 3 : 71-94, 1991

    28 Rescher,N, "Welfare: the Social Issues in Philosophical Perspective" University of Pittsburg Press 1972

    29 Campbell, A., "The Quality of American Life" Russell Sage Foundation 1976

    30 OECD, "The OECD List of Social Indicators. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development"

    31 Cheng,S.T, "Subjective Quality of Life in the Planning and Evaluation of Program" 11 : 123-134, 1988

    32 Carley,M, "Social Measurement and Social Indicators: Issues of Policy and Theory" George Allen & Unwin 1981

    33 Davis, Earl E, "Social Indicators of Living Conditions in Ireland with European Comparisons" 25 : 103-36, 1991

    34 이종만, "R. H. Dave의 평생교육론 고찰" 한국평생교육학회 4 (4): 141-156, 1998

    35 Lin,Nan, "Quality of Life in Urban China: A Model and Data from Shanghhai"

    36 Lane,R.E, "Quality of Life and Quality of Persons: A New Role for Government?" 22 (22): 1994

    37 Schuessler,K.F, "Quality of Life Research and Sociology" 11 : 129-139, 1985

    38 Schuessler, K. H, "Quality of Life Research and Sociology" 11 : 129-149, 1985

    39 Liu,Ben-Chieh, "Quality of Life Indicators: A Preliminary Investigation" 1 : 187-208, 1974

    40 UNESCO, "Population and Quality of Life"

    41 Rice,R.W, "Organizational Work and the Overall Quality of Life" 5 : 155-178, 1984

    42 이희수, "OECD 국가 웰빙 평생학습 모델 서설" 1-21, 2008

    43 Maslow,A, "Motivation and Personality" Harper and Row 1970

    44 Dave,R.H, "Lifelong Education and School Curriculum" UIE 1973

    45 Faure,E., "Learning to Be: the World of Education Today and Tomorrow" UNESCO 1972

    46 Friedman,H.G, "Improving the Quality of Life: a Holistic Scientific Strategy" Praeger 1997

    47 Coates. B. E, "Geography and Inequality" Oxford University 1977

    48 Evans,D.R, "Enhancing Quality of Life in the Population at Large" 33 (33): 47-88, 1994

    49 Shin, D. C, "Economic growth, Quality of Life, and Development Policy: a Case Study of South Korea" 16 (16): 195-213, 1983

    50 Meyer,D, "Community-relevant of Quality of Life" 23 (23): 108-125, 1987

    51 Stewart,Frances, "Basic Needs, Capabilities, and Human Development. In Pursuit of the Quality of Life" Oxford University Press 46-65, 1996

    52 정규현, "21세기 한국의 사회발전전략분석평가: 경주시민을 대상으로" 나남 1994

    53 한국사회정책학회, "21세기 선진사회와 삶의 질 개선을 위한 사회정책과제" 한국사회정책학회 (2) : 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-06-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Lifelong Learning Society KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 () KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS () KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 () KCI등재후보
    2005-05-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 방송통신교육연구소 -> 원격교육연구소
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.43 1.43 1.34
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.27 1.22 1.468 0.57
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼