SW공학 수준과 SW개발 프로젝트의 생산성

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, as IT convergence has seen rapid growth the role and scope of software has been extended. many software companies are trying to improve the software quality and project outcome using software process improvement approach to cope with increasing software demands and software quality. Although software process improvement is difficult task which requires a lot of cost and time, there is still insufficient objective evidence on business benefits by its deployment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between software process improvement and software project productivity. That is, we investigated whether there is difference in software development productivity depends on software engineering level using statistical methods. We found that the software development productivity is different across the software engineering levels and the higher software engineering level can lead to improved software development productivity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송인오, "스크럼을 활용한 소규모 소프트웨어 개발 기반의 소프트웨어 프로세스 인증 모델" 한국컴퓨터정보학회 16 (16): 217-226, 2011

2 최병하, "개발 생산성 향상을 위한 분산 시스템 기반의 프레임워크 설계" 한국컴퓨터정보학회 17 (17): 53-60, 2012

3 B. Efron, "The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans" Society for Industrial and Mathematics 1987

4 H-W Jung, "The Internal Consistency of Key Process Areas in the Capability Maturity Model® (SW-CMM®) for Software, Carnegie Mellon University" Software Engineering Institute, CMU 1994

5 R. Ponce, "Steps to On-Time, On-Budget Project Delivery" ITworld 2009

6 ISBSG, "Ropository R10 Field Description" 2007

7 D. L. Gibson, "Performance Results of CMMI-Based ProcessImprovement" Software Engineering Institute, CarnegieMellon University 2006

8 A. J. Albrecht, "Measuring Application Development Productivity" 1979 : 83-92, 1979

9 ISO/IEC TR 15504-4, "Information technology -- Process assessment-Part 5: An examplar Process Assessment Model"

10 IFPUG, "Function Points Counting Practices Manual(release 4.2), International Function Point UserGroup" Westerville 2004

11 K. El-Emam, "Estimating the Extent of Standards Use : The Case of ISO/IEC 15504" 53 (53): 137-143, 2000

12 Standish Group, "Chaos: A Recipe for Success, tech. report" Standish Group Int'l 2009

13 Paulk, M.C., "Capability Maturity Model for software" CMU/Software Engineering Institute 1993

14 CMMI, "CMMI for Development Version 1.2, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008, Technical Report" SoftwareEngineering Institute 2006

15 CMMI, "CMMI Product Team CMMI for Development, Version 1.3 ,Software Engineering Institute" Carnegie Mellon University 2010

16 CMMI, "CMMI Product Team CMMI for Development, Version 1.3" Software Engineering Institute 2010

17 B. Efron, "Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy" 1 (1): 54-75, 1986

18 B. Efron, "Bootstrap Methods : Another Look at the Jackknife" 7 : 1-26, 1979

19 C. Jones, "Applied Software Measurement: Global Analysis of Productivity and Quality" McGraw-Hill 2008

20 M. K. Kerr, "Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data" 7 : 819-837, 2000

21 B. Efron, "An Introduction to the Bootstrap" Chapman and Hall 1994

22 H-W. Jung, "An Evaluation of the SPICE Rating Scale with Regard to the Internal Consistency of Capability Measurement" 105-115, 2002

23 R. Hefner, "Achieving the Promised Benefits of CMMI" 2005

24 A. J. Albrecht, "AD/M Productivity Measurement and Estimate Validation" IBM Corporation 1984

25 ISO/IEC 14143-1, "2007 Information Technology- Software Measurement -Functional Size Measurement- Part 1: Definitions of Concepts: InternationalOrganization for Standardization"

26 ISO/IEC 14143-1, "1998 Information Technology - Software Measurement Functional Size Measurement - Part 1: Definitions of Concepts: International Organization for Standardization"