1525년의 獨逸 農民戰爭: 초기 부르주아 革命인가? 平民革命인가? = 농민전쟁의 성격논의와 남은 문제

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The German Peasant War of 1525 can be regarded both as the last great medieval peasant revolt and as the first modern revolution. It offers also a good example for the comparative study of peasant society in general and social conflicts in agrarian societies in particular. Considering the potentiality of the comparative analysis with the analogous events in Chinese and Korean history this essay tries to sketch the main lines of interpretation of the Peasants' War and to discuss the two great thesis of it: early bourgeois revolution and the revolution of common man.
The Peasant War has been one of the most controversial themes since the formation of modern historical scholarship in Germany. The interpretation and characterization of the war itself were deeply interwoven with the political interests of every historians at their times. In the middle of 19th century came out the basic framework of main interpretations which more or less influenced continuing debates. In 1930s G. Franz published a great monograph on the Peasants' War which represented a classic interpretation in German academic historical scholarship. He argued that socio-economic grievance played a relative little role. and that the war was a political movement seeking to revive older customary rights of peasants.
After the second World War a Russian historian M. M. Smirin raised a new Marxist interpretation upon the solid research of source materials. Building on Engels' and Smirin's framework East German historians advanced the thesis of 'early bourgeois revolution'. This thesis gave an important impetus to the historians of West Germany for the revision of Peasant War. In 1970s there were some stimulating attempts to bridge the gap between political and socio-economic interpretations. The most important has been the work of Peter Blickle, whose main thesis is known as 'revolution of common man', Up to now, especially after the fall of Wall in 1989, Blickle's interpretation takes dominant position in the historiography of Peasant War.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序言
• Ⅱ. 서건사적 槪況
• Ⅲ. ‘農民戰爭’: 名稱과 해석의 系譜
• Ⅳ. 主要 爭點과 남은 문제
• Ⅴ. 結語
• 〈Abstract〉