RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    계층분석법을 이용한 건물 에너지관리시스템의 에너지절감성능 평가지표 제안

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As annual energy consumption rates in the Korean built environment are significantly increasing every year, deployment of building energy management system (BEMS) needs to be more encouraged and be thoroughly implemented in order to fundamentally reduce building energy consumption rate. However, its successful deployment and thorough implementation require understanding of the status and trends of BEMS in the domestic and overseas building sector. Clear understanding of the role of BEMS and its performance assessment items and assessment indices can significantly improve the performance level of BEMS. This study aims at suggesting assessment indices for evaluating energy saving performance using AHP analysis in operating energy saving control as a base of impact of energy saving control on energy usage in building through analysis of building composition element and saving control element. To this end, weighting ratio of composition element are suggested using AHP method over energy management specialists and the items composing assessment indices are verified through the consensus among the domain experts. In addition, the assessment indices were applied to four real-world BEMS operated buildings in order to evaluate their energy saving performance and to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed assessment method. As a result of verification of assessment indices suggested in this study, it is necessary to further integrate various kind of saving control schemes into the current energy saving control items if items of assessment indices is to reach the goal of energy saving. Also, it is necessary to consider adoption ratio of energy saving control item and degree of level of application item, additionally, in order to make up for degree of energy saving control.
    번역하기

    As annual energy consumption rates in the Korean built environment are significantly increasing every year, deployment of building energy management system (BEMS) needs to be more encouraged and be thoroughly implemented in order to fundamentally redu...

    As annual energy consumption rates in the Korean built environment are significantly increasing every year, deployment of building energy management system (BEMS) needs to be more encouraged and be thoroughly implemented in order to fundamentally reduce building energy consumption rate. However, its successful deployment and thorough implementation require understanding of the status and trends of BEMS in the domestic and overseas building sector. Clear understanding of the role of BEMS and its performance assessment items and assessment indices can significantly improve the performance level of BEMS. This study aims at suggesting assessment indices for evaluating energy saving performance using AHP analysis in operating energy saving control as a base of impact of energy saving control on energy usage in building through analysis of building composition element and saving control element. To this end, weighting ratio of composition element are suggested using AHP method over energy management specialists and the items composing assessment indices are verified through the consensus among the domain experts. In addition, the assessment indices were applied to four real-world BEMS operated buildings in order to evaluate their energy saving performance and to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed assessment method. As a result of verification of assessment indices suggested in this study, it is necessary to further integrate various kind of saving control schemes into the current energy saving control items if items of assessment indices is to reach the goal of energy saving. Also, it is necessary to consider adoption ratio of energy saving control item and degree of level of application item, additionally, in order to make up for degree of energy saving control.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 유럽 건물 에너지관리 표준(EN 15232)
    • 3. 건물에너지관리 에너지절감성능 평가지표 제시
    • 4. 실제 건물에 대한 평가지표 실증작업
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 유럽 건물 에너지관리 표준(EN 15232)
    • 3. 건물에너지관리 에너지절감성능 평가지표 제시
    • 4. 실제 건물에 대한 평가지표 실증작업
    • 5. 결론
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "환경·에너지성능 최적화를 위한 BEMS 건물관리시스템" 일본공기조화·위생공학회 2001

    2 "설비시스템 에너지성능계측 메뉴얼"

    3 정연쾌, "고효율 저비용빌딩 에너지 관리를 위한 원격 빌딩 에너지 관제 플랫폼 구조" 한국통신학회 62-62, 2011

    4 "건물관리표준 종합가이드"

    5 "EN 15232 : Energy performance of buildings–impact of building automation, controls and building management"

    6 "BEMS 보급과 활용촉진 방향" 일본공기조화·위생공학회 2007

    7 이케다 고이치, "BEMS 범위와 에너지절감에의 역할" 일본전기설비학회 2006

    8 Hyunjin Yoon, "A distributed platform for low-cost, energy-efficient, and secure building energy management and control" 274-275, 2011

    1 "환경·에너지성능 최적화를 위한 BEMS 건물관리시스템" 일본공기조화·위생공학회 2001

    2 "설비시스템 에너지성능계측 메뉴얼"

    3 정연쾌, "고효율 저비용빌딩 에너지 관리를 위한 원격 빌딩 에너지 관제 플랫폼 구조" 한국통신학회 62-62, 2011

    4 "건물관리표준 종합가이드"

    5 "EN 15232 : Energy performance of buildings–impact of building automation, controls and building management"

    6 "BEMS 보급과 활용촉진 방향" 일본공기조화·위생공학회 2007

    7 이케다 고이치, "BEMS 범위와 에너지절감에의 역할" 일본전기설비학회 2006

    8 Hyunjin Yoon, "A distributed platform for low-cost, energy-efficient, and secure building energy management and control" 274-275, 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계
    외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-08-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.4 0.742 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼