RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사용자의 개인 혁신성, 신뢰, 감응신뢰가 전자정부 이용의도에 미치는 영향 = The Influence of Users' Personal Innovativeness, Trust, and Felt Trust on Intention to Use E-government

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60056350

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As the governments are turning into e-governments, development of information and communication technologies is supposed to greatly facilitate the works to implement efficient and effective services online. The success of e-government is considered providing users like citizens and businesses with more opportunities to participate in democratic processes. The antecedent variables on intention to use e-government are personal innovativeness, trust and felt trust. Personal innovativeness refers to the individual trait to try out new products or services or ideas. Trust is the main factor to strengthen intention to use in virtual space as well as in real world. In response to trust, many researchers focuses on felt trust that means a user's perception that he/she is trusted by e-government. These trust and felt trust have an positive impact on innovations or consequences including intention to use. This study was conducted to identify whether personal innovativeness, trust and felt trust influence intention to use e-government. In addition, this study was investigated the moderating effect of trust and felt trust on the relationship between personal innovativeness and intention to use e-government. These hypotheses on data from a survey of users were tested. The results show that the personal innovativeness, trust and felt trust have positive significant impact on intentions to use e-government. And the personal innovativeness has moderating effects on the relationship between trust, felt trust and intentions to use e-government.
    번역하기

    As the governments are turning into e-governments, development of information and communication technologies is supposed to greatly facilitate the works to implement efficient and effective services online. The success of e-government is considered pr...

    As the governments are turning into e-governments, development of information and communication technologies is supposed to greatly facilitate the works to implement efficient and effective services online. The success of e-government is considered providing users like citizens and businesses with more opportunities to participate in democratic processes. The antecedent variables on intention to use e-government are personal innovativeness, trust and felt trust. Personal innovativeness refers to the individual trait to try out new products or services or ideas. Trust is the main factor to strengthen intention to use in virtual space as well as in real world. In response to trust, many researchers focuses on felt trust that means a user's perception that he/she is trusted by e-government. These trust and felt trust have an positive impact on innovations or consequences including intention to use. This study was conducted to identify whether personal innovativeness, trust and felt trust influence intention to use e-government. In addition, this study was investigated the moderating effect of trust and felt trust on the relationship between personal innovativeness and intention to use e-government. These hypotheses on data from a survey of users were tested. The results show that the personal innovativeness, trust and felt trust have positive significant impact on intentions to use e-government. And the personal innovativeness has moderating effects on the relationship between trust, felt trust and intentions to use e-government.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김석주, "참여정부의 전자정부 추진성과와 향후 과제" 한국지역정보화학회 10 (10): 111-134, 2007

    2 명승환, "차세대 전자정부에 대한 인식: 주요광역시를 중심으로" 한국정보화진흥원 12 (12): 131-149, 2005

    3 송희준, "전자정부정책 성과구조와 영향요인 분석 - NEIS를 중심으로 -" 한국정책학회 17 (17): 223-248, 2008

    4 윤상오, "전자정부 성숙도 평가모형의 개발과 적용에 관한 연구" 한국정책학회 11 (11): 243-272, 2002

    5 황성수, "전자거버넌스와 정책의제 설정- 전자정부사이트에서의 정책제안과 시민참여 탐색연구 -" 한국정책학회 20 (20): 1-22, 2011

    6 Andersen, K. V., "e-Government: Five Key Challenges for Management" 4 (4): 1-8, 2006

    7 Suki, Norazah Mohd, "User Acceptance of the E-Government Services in Malaysia: Structural Equation Modelling Approach" 5 : 395-413, 2010

    8 Venkatesh, V, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

    9 Wangpipatwong, S, "Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy" 6 (6): 55-64, 2008

    10 McLain, D., "Trust, Risk and Decision Making in Organisation Change" 23 (23): 152-176, 1999

    1 김석주, "참여정부의 전자정부 추진성과와 향후 과제" 한국지역정보화학회 10 (10): 111-134, 2007

    2 명승환, "차세대 전자정부에 대한 인식: 주요광역시를 중심으로" 한국정보화진흥원 12 (12): 131-149, 2005

    3 송희준, "전자정부정책 성과구조와 영향요인 분석 - NEIS를 중심으로 -" 한국정책학회 17 (17): 223-248, 2008

    4 윤상오, "전자정부 성숙도 평가모형의 개발과 적용에 관한 연구" 한국정책학회 11 (11): 243-272, 2002

    5 황성수, "전자거버넌스와 정책의제 설정- 전자정부사이트에서의 정책제안과 시민참여 탐색연구 -" 한국정책학회 20 (20): 1-22, 2011

    6 Andersen, K. V., "e-Government: Five Key Challenges for Management" 4 (4): 1-8, 2006

    7 Suki, Norazah Mohd, "User Acceptance of the E-Government Services in Malaysia: Structural Equation Modelling Approach" 5 : 395-413, 2010

    8 Venkatesh, V, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

    9 Wangpipatwong, S, "Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy" 6 (6): 55-64, 2008

    10 McLain, D., "Trust, Risk and Decision Making in Organisation Change" 23 (23): 152-176, 1999

    11 Deutsch-Salamon, S, "Trust that Binds: The Impact of Collective Felt Trust on Organizational Performance" 93 (93): 593-601, 2008

    12 Belanger, F., "Trust and Risk in E-Government Adoption" 17 (17): 165-176, 2008

    13 Park, JungKun, "The Role of Consumer Innovativeness and Trust for Adopting Internet Phone Services" 1 : 1-16, 2011

    14 Ruppel, Cynthia P, "The Relationship of Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment and Innovation" 25 (25): 313-328, 2000

    15 Baron, R. M., "The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

    16 Danziger, J. N, "The Impacts of Information Technology on Public Administration: An Analysis of Empirical Research Form the “Golden Age” of Transformation" 24 (24): 591-627, 2002

    17 De', Rahul., "The Impact of Indian E-Government Initiatives: Issues of Poverty and Vulnerability Reduction" 27 (27): 88-100, 2006

    18 Angel, H. C., "The Effect of Innovativeness on the Adoption of B2C E-Commerce: A Model based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour" 24 (24): 2830-2847, 2008

    19 Lee, J., "Task Complexity and Different Decision Criteria for Online Service Acceptance: A Comparison of Two E-Government Compliance Service Domains" 47 (47): 424-435, 2009

    20 Robinson, Leroy Jr, "Sales Force Use of Technology: Antecedents to Technology Acceptance" 58 (58): 1623-1631, 2005

    21 Salem, J. A, "Public and Private Sector Interests in e-Government: A Look at the DOE's PubSCIENCE" 20 (20): 13-27, 2003

    22 Levi, M., "Political Trust and Trustworthiness" 3 (3): 475-507, 2000

    23 Horst, M, "Perceived Usefulness, Personal Experiences, Risk Perception and Trust as Determinants of Adoption of E-Government Services in the Netherlands" 23 (23): 1838-1852, 2007

    24 Hair, J., "Multivariate data analysis" Prentice Hall 2006

    25 Goldsmith, R. E., "Measuring Consumer Innovativeness" 9 (9): 209-221, 1991

    26 Naqvi, Syed Jafar, "M-Government Services Initiatives in Oman" 6 : 817-824, 2009

    27 문명재, "Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government" 15 (15): 371-391, 200507

    28 Joreskog K., "LISREL 8: Structural Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language" Erlbaum 1993

    29 "Key Issues in E-Government Strategy and Management"

    30 Hasan, Sadik., "Introducing E-Government in Bangladesh: Problems and Prospects" 78 (78): 111-125, 2003

    31 Tornatzky, L. G., "Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings" 29 (29): 28-45, 1982

    32 McLeod, Alexander, "Individual Taxpayer Intention to Use Tax Preparation Software: Examining Experience, Trust, and Perceived Risk" 6 (6): 25-44, 2009

    33 Colesca, Sofia Elena, "Increasing E-Trust: A solution to Minimize Risk in E-Government Adoption" 4 (4): 31-44, 2009

    34 Clegg, Chris W., "Implicating trust in the innovation process" 75 (75): 409-422, 2002

    35 Lean, Ooh Kim, "Factors Influencing Intention to Use E-Government Services among Citizens in Malaysia”" 29 (29): 458-475, 2009

    36 Jebeile, Sam, "Explaining Intention to Use an Information Technology Innovation: An Empirical Comparison of the Perceived Characteristics of Innovating and Technology Acceptance Models" 15 (15): 137-152, 2007

    37 Crespo, Angel Herrero, "Explaining B2C E-Commerce acceptance: An Integrative Model based onthe Framework by Gatignon and Robertson" 20 (20): 212-224, 2008

    38 Fornell, C, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

    39 Hyvonen, Saara, "Entrepreneurial Innovations, Market-Driven Intangibles and Learning Orientation: Critical Indicators for Performance Advantages in SMEs" 7 (7): 643-660, 2006

    40 Gronlund, A., "Electronic Government - Design, Applications, and Management" Idea Group 2002

    41 Ambali, A. R., "E-government policy: Ground issues in e-filling system" 11 (11): 249-266, 2009

    42 Fang, Zhiyuan., "E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development" 10 (10): 1-22, 2002

    43 United Nations., "E-Government Survey 2010: Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis" UN Publishing Section 2010

    44 이정우, "Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model" 18 (18): 122-136, 200101

    45 McKnight, D. H, "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-Commerce: An Integrative Typology" 13 (13): 334-359, 2002

    46 Dashti, Ali, "Developing Trust Reciprocity in Electronic Government: The Role of Felt Trust" 2009

    47 Hung, S., "Determinants of User Acceptance of the Egovernment Services: The Case of Online Tax Filing and Payment System" 23 (23): 97-122, 2006

    48 Scott, S. G, "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994

    49 Pavlou, P., "Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model" 7 (7): 101-134, 2003

    50 Asher, H. B., "Causal Modeling" University Press 1983

    51 Shapiro, D., "Business on a Handshake" 8 (8): 365-377, 1992

    52 Webber, A., "Benchmark 2007: Minimal progress in eGovernment adoption" Forrester Research Inc 2007

    53 Schoorman, F., "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future" 32 (32): 344-354, 2007

    54 Wu, I., "An Extension of Trust and TAM Model with TPB in the Initial Adoption of On-Line Tax: An Empirical Study" 62 (62): 784-808, 2005

    55 Jayasingh, Sudarsan, "An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Behavioral Intention Toward Mobile Coupons in Malaysia" 4 (4): 221-242, 2009

    56 이해영, "A study of the impact of personal innovativeness on online travel shopping behavior - A case study of Korean travelers" ELSEVIER SCI LTD 28 (28): 886-897, 200706

    57 Gatignon, H., "A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research" 11 (11): 849-867, 1985

    58 Nauman, S. E., "A Case for Procedural Justice Climate: Development and Test of a Multilevel Model" 43 (43): 881-889, 2000

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼