RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    텍스트 난도와 텍스트 선정에 관한 독자 요인 -초,중,고등학교 독자들의 반응을 중심으로 한 시론- = Rethinking Reader Factors in Text Difficulty and Text Selection

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102063207

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to identify how reader factors were involved in text difficulty and text selection. This study also investigated how the reader factors interacted with text factors in the processes of text-reader matching. For these purposes, 464 students participated in this study, and survey and interview data were collected. The main question of the survey was how the student readers thought and described difficult books in their own words. The survey results showed that student readers struggled the most when they have to read the book that they were not interested in. They also had difficulty in reading when the book had many difficult vocabularies and requires high level of background knowledge. These findings show that the level of text difficulty was not decided by the text factors only. Reader factors, including readers`` interest and purpose of reading powerfully affect the level of text difficulty that readers really realize. Finally, this study highlighted some differences between students`` views of reading difficulty from responses of elementary(2nd, 6th graders), middle school, and high school students.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to identify how reader factors were involved in text difficulty and text selection. This study also investigated how the reader factors interacted with text factors in the processes of text-reader matching. For these purp...

    The purpose of this study was to identify how reader factors were involved in text difficulty and text selection. This study also investigated how the reader factors interacted with text factors in the processes of text-reader matching. For these purposes, 464 students participated in this study, and survey and interview data were collected. The main question of the survey was how the student readers thought and described difficult books in their own words. The survey results showed that student readers struggled the most when they have to read the book that they were not interested in. They also had difficulty in reading when the book had many difficult vocabularies and requires high level of background knowledge. These findings show that the level of text difficulty was not decided by the text factors only. Reader factors, including readers`` interest and purpose of reading powerfully affect the level of text difficulty that readers really realize. Finally, this study highlighted some differences between students`` views of reading difficulty from responses of elementary(2nd, 6th graders), middle school, and high school students.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이성영, "초등 교과서의 이독성 비교 연구 -국어, 사회, 과학 교과서를 중심으로-" 국어교육학회 (41) : 169-193, 2011

    2 정옥년, "읽기 지도에서 수준별 텍스트 활용" 한국독서학회 (9) : 243-268, 2003

    3 이지영, "아동독자의 이야기책 읽기 반응 연구" 고려대학교 2011

    4 최재완, "신문 경제기사의 독이성에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 1995

    5 노명완, "새로운 독서지도: 독해이론과 독해지도의 랑데부, In 국어교육론" 한샘출판사 114-139, 1987

    6 정옥년, "베스트셀러와 독서교육" 한국독서학회 (13) : 101-144, 2005

    7 노명완, "독서 자료의 비판적 고찰" 한국독서학회 (3) : 7-32, 1998

    8 김대희, "독서 수준과 텍스트 수준의 위계화 방안에 대한 비판적 고찰" 국어교육학회 41 (41): 147-168, 2011

    9 이순영, "독서 동기와 몰입에 영향을 주는 요인에 관한 이론적 고찰" 한국독서학회 (16) : 357-379, 2006

    10 정혜승, "글 난도(difficulty) 평가를 위한 질적 방법 연구" 한국어교육학회 (131) : 523-549, 2010

    1 이성영, "초등 교과서의 이독성 비교 연구 -국어, 사회, 과학 교과서를 중심으로-" 국어교육학회 (41) : 169-193, 2011

    2 정옥년, "읽기 지도에서 수준별 텍스트 활용" 한국독서학회 (9) : 243-268, 2003

    3 이지영, "아동독자의 이야기책 읽기 반응 연구" 고려대학교 2011

    4 최재완, "신문 경제기사의 독이성에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 1995

    5 노명완, "새로운 독서지도: 독해이론과 독해지도의 랑데부, In 국어교육론" 한샘출판사 114-139, 1987

    6 정옥년, "베스트셀러와 독서교육" 한국독서학회 (13) : 101-144, 2005

    7 노명완, "독서 자료의 비판적 고찰" 한국독서학회 (3) : 7-32, 1998

    8 김대희, "독서 수준과 텍스트 수준의 위계화 방안에 대한 비판적 고찰" 국어교육학회 41 (41): 147-168, 2011

    9 이순영, "독서 동기와 몰입에 영향을 주는 요인에 관한 이론적 고찰" 한국독서학회 (16) : 357-379, 2006

    10 정혜승, "글 난도(difficulty) 평가를 위한 질적 방법 연구" 한국어교육학회 (131) : 523-549, 2010

    11 Adams,M.J., "The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning, In Reading more, Reading Better: Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy" Guilford Publications 163-189, 2009

    12 Mesmer, H. A. E., "Text-reader matching: Meeting the needs of struggling readers, In Finding the Right Texts: What Works for Beginning and Struggling Readers" Guilford Press 149-176, 2009

    13 McNamara D. S., "Sources of text difficulty: Across the ages and genres, In Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences" Rowman & Littlefield Education

    14 Fresch, S. L., "Self-selection of early literacy learners" 49 : 220-227, 1995

    15 Graves, M. F., "Scaffolding Reading Experiences: Designs for student success (2nd ed.)" Christopher-Gordon 2003

    16 RAND Reading Study Group, "Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension" Rand 2002

    17 Guthrie, J. T., "Reading Engagement: Motivating Readers Through Integrated Instruction" International Reading Associations 1997

    18 Fry, E., "Readability, In Literacy in America: An encyclopedia of history, theory, and practice" ABC-Clio 480-487, 2002

    19 Chall, J. S., "Qualitative Assessment of Text Difficulty: A practical guide for teachers and writers" Brookline Books 1996

    20 Stanovich, K. E., "Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy" 16 : 32-71, 1986

    21 Lesesne, T., "Making the Match: The right book for the right reader at the right time, Grades 4-12" Stenhouse 2003

    22 Fielding, L. F., "Making difficult books accessible and easy books acceptable" 45 : 678-685, 1992

    23 Serafini, F., "Levels or labels: Leveled (leveling) texts in the elementary reading curriculum" 7 (7): 9-17, 2006

    24 Fitzgerald, A., "IRA presidents take stand on misuse of readability formulas" 61 : 883-884, 1984

    25 Chall, J. S., "Graded Reading Paragraphs in Health Education: Readability by example" Ohio State University 1947

    26 Hiebert, E. H., "Finding the Right Texts: What works for beginning and struggling readers" Guilford 2008

    27 Guthrie, J., "Engaged Reading: Processes, practices and policy implications" Teachers College Press 1999

    28 CCSS Initiative, "Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects"

    29 Donovan, C. A., "Beyond the independent-level text: Considering the reader-text match in first graders' self-selections during recreational reading" 21 : 309-333, 2000

    30 Hiebert, E. H., "An Examination of Current Text Difficulty Indices with Early Reading Texts" TextProject, Inc 2010

    31 Dole, E., "A formula for predicting readability and instruction" 27 : 11-20, 1948

    32 이순영, "21세기 국어과 교육과정 개정의 방향 탐색 -미국의 ‘공통핵심기준’의 특성과 시사점 분석을 중심으로-" 청람어문교육학회 (43) : 7-35, 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.509 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼