현행 형법에서 법정형의 정비방안 = Suggestion for Organization of Statutory Punishments under Current Criminal Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main idea stipulated in this article is as follows:
1. Systematic reorganization of elements of offenses is prerequisite condition to organization of statutory punishments under current Criminal Law. Applaudable objective of such reorganization of the elements of offenses is to supplement the current law with more precise and specific prescription of the elements.
2. It is an abstruse work to develop an absolute criteria applicable to determine the adequate degree of specification of elements of offenses that are not excessively limitary to the sentencing discretion of a court. By reference to foreign legislations, nonetheless, established factors consisting the elements of offenses which have been embodied in lex specialis through the elements of offenses and the sentencing factors consisting the criteria for sentencing under the existing special criminal laws, must be incorporated into the elements under the Criminal Law.
3. As to the provisions that have identical elements of offenses and merely prescribes additional statutory punishments under the special criminal laws, they should be repealed by modifying the provisions in the Criminal Law. For those provisions that creates additional or independent elements of offenses, these elements should be incorporated into the basic provisions in the Criminal Law on selective basis.
4. It is desirable that the sentencing factors, which are de facto functioning as elements of offenses, among those consisting the criteria for sentencing determination become the elements of offenses through amendment of the Criminal Law.
5. Special consideration should be given to the a priori or normative standards, as well as empirical standards extracted from the collected data of sentencing practices when determining the sentence of an offense under statutory punishments of newly prescribed elements of offenses, or adjusting the statutory punishments under the existing elements.
6. As to determining the statutory sentence for a category of offences which preventive security measures may be sentenced concurrently, the statutory sentence should be set up in consideration of the preventive security measures to be sentenced together. Study on plans for clear prescription of the extent of possible preventive measures for offences respectively must be followed.
7. It is inevitable that the statutory punishments be adjusted as a consequence of extended ceiling of limited penal servitude. It is also desirable to provide more descriptive and specified upper and lower limit for individual offences in doing so.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 법정형 정비의 기본방향
• Ⅱ. 범죄구성요건의 세분화, 구체화를 위한 시도
• Ⅲ. 법정형의 구체적 양정기준
• Ⅳ. 결론
• [참고문헌]
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 오영근, "형사특별볍의 제정실태와 개선방안" 한국형사정책연구원 1996

2 허일태, "형사특별법의 형법편입방향, 형사법 개정 연구 자료집" 법무부 719-, 2008

3 박기석, "형사특별법의 구성요건 및 법정형의 문제점과 정비방안" 법조협회 53 (53): 141-166, 2004

4 김혜경, "형법상 개별범죄 징역형 정비의 기초" 한국형사정책연구원 22 (22): 1-34, 2011

5 허일태, "형법대전(刑法大典)의 내용상 특징 - 적용범위와 죄형법정주의를 중심으로 -" 한국형사법학회 20 (20): 91-110, 2008

6 이승현, "형법과 형사특별법의 법정형 정비방안, 형사법 개정 연구 자료집 Ⅱ" 법무부 1-, 2009

7 이기헌, "형법 및 형사특별법상 유사처벌조항 정비방안" 한국형사정책연구원 1998

8 최호진, "형가중적 형사특별법에 대한 법이론적 문제점" 30 (30): 207-, 2006

9 허일태, "현행 형법의 법정형에 대한 문제점과 개선방안, 형사법 개정 연구자료집Ⅲ-1" 법무부 3-, 2010

10 오영근, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 폐지의 당위성" 한국형사정책학회 17 (17): 33-53, 2005

11 윤동호, "특별형법전의 정비를 위한 기초연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2006

12 이주원, "특별형법" 弘文社 2011

13 손철우, "우리나라 양형 현황에 관한 기초보고" 양형위원회 2-, 2007

14 최정학, "양형의 규범논리" 한국형사정책학회 17 (17): 251-279, 2005

15 최석윤, "양형기준설정과 관련된 몇 가지 고려사항" 한국비교형사법학회 10 (10): 71-97, 2008

16 양형위원회, "양형기준"

17 신동준, "양형개혁에 대한 법체계의 반응 – 미 연방 양형지침서의 사회체계이론적분석" 한국사회학회 37 (37): 8-230, 2003

18 김일수, "바람직한 양형조사제도 – 기관갈등의 분석과 출구" 세창출판사 2010

19 오영근, "바람직한 양형기준제와 양형위원회 운영의 방식에 관한 연구" 대검찰청 2010

20 정완, "미국의 형사절차" 한국형사정책연구원 2000

21 박용철, "미국의 현대 양형 제도 연구 : Blakey 판례와 Booker 판례를 넘어서" 한국비교형사법학회 7 (7): 291-312, 2005

22 배종대, "‘특별’형법을 ‘보통’형법으로 만들기" 한국형사정책학회 18 (18): 9-20, 2006

23 양형위원회, "2010 연간보고서" 2010