RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지속가능한 토지이용 및 관리르 위한 개발권양도제 도입방안 = A Study on the Introduction of Transferable Development Rights for the Sustainable Land Use Management in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104758706

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Idea of separating a development right from landownership has attracted interest from policy-makers and academics in Korea. In addition, the emphasis on sustainable land use requires a new land policy which makes up for the limitation of zoning as land use regulation. This interest raises questions about the applicability of the idea within the Korean context. This study is aimed at reviewing the American Transferable Developement Rights(TDRs) in terms of sustainable land use, and suggesting policy implications through schematic simulations. Schematic simulations are attempted to show a clear conceptual framework of the TDRs. The results provide some policy implications. Firstly, the TDRs should be applied to exceptional circumstances which cannot solved by other policy measures. Secondly, the policy should be applied with first priority to the case which is necessary to preserve historic buildings and cultural assets. Thirdly, the TDRs should be applied to undeveloped areas rather than developed areas. Fourthly, in-depth analyses and verifications of the TDRs' marketability will be needed. Fifthly, the central government should provide legal provisions and policy guidelines for local governments. Finally, the TDRs should designed properly in consideration of institutional capacity in contemporary Korean societies. This study concludes that the introduction of the TDR is a second-best strategy for 'living together' in a limited space in a fragmented Korean society. These efforts is not be easy, but it is key to solving conflictual spatial problems in the future.
    번역하기

    The Idea of separating a development right from landownership has attracted interest from policy-makers and academics in Korea. In addition, the emphasis on sustainable land use requires a new land policy which makes up for the limitation of zoning as...

    The Idea of separating a development right from landownership has attracted interest from policy-makers and academics in Korea. In addition, the emphasis on sustainable land use requires a new land policy which makes up for the limitation of zoning as land use regulation. This interest raises questions about the applicability of the idea within the Korean context. This study is aimed at reviewing the American Transferable Developement Rights(TDRs) in terms of sustainable land use, and suggesting policy implications through schematic simulations. Schematic simulations are attempted to show a clear conceptual framework of the TDRs. The results provide some policy implications. Firstly, the TDRs should be applied to exceptional circumstances which cannot solved by other policy measures. Secondly, the policy should be applied with first priority to the case which is necessary to preserve historic buildings and cultural assets. Thirdly, the TDRs should be applied to undeveloped areas rather than developed areas. Fourthly, in-depth analyses and verifications of the TDRs' marketability will be needed. Fifthly, the central government should provide legal provisions and policy guidelines for local governments. Finally, the TDRs should designed properly in consideration of institutional capacity in contemporary Korean societies. This study concludes that the introduction of the TDR is a second-best strategy for 'living together' in a limited space in a fragmented Korean society. These efforts is not be easy, but it is key to solving conflictual spatial problems in the future.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-06-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : korea Planners Association -> Journal of Korea Planning Association
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한국토ㆍ도시계획학회 -> 대한국토·도시계획학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.86 0.86 0.96
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.94 0.94 1.343 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼