RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일본의 도시재생정책 = Urban Regeneration Policy in Japan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104752572

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Urban regeneration policy, launched as a part of ‘structural reform’ of Koizumi regime in Japan from 2001, is widely considered as a government's revolutionary step to boost a decade-long sluggish economy and refurnish major cities. In its implementation structure and logic, the policy is commonly seen as a Japanese version of neo-liberal urban policies in the West, especially U.S. and U.K. Yet, this paper asserts that Japanese urban regeneration is on the track of developmental state, distancing itself from the major western urban theories that focus on the neo-liberal trend and globalization effect. Urban development in Japan is considerably subject to the patterned policies molded by the linkage among politicians, bureaucrats and interest groups that has been consolidated in the high growth period. Unlike neo-liberal trend, the central government take a substantial policy initiative against local governments and private sectors. In a framework of political clientelism, the relation between central and local, and between public and private is interdependent rather than competitive. In conclusion, even if there are many signs of malfunction and readjustment, urban development in Japan is still dominated by the long standing system of developmental state.키 워 드 도시재생정책, 발전국가, 도시개발, 일본Keywords Urban Pegeneration Policy, Developmental State, Urban Development, Japan
    번역하기

    Urban regeneration policy, launched as a part of ‘structural reform’ of Koizumi regime in Japan from 2001, is widely considered as a government's revolutionary step to boost a decade-long sluggish economy and refurnish major cities. In its impleme...

    Urban regeneration policy, launched as a part of ‘structural reform’ of Koizumi regime in Japan from 2001, is widely considered as a government's revolutionary step to boost a decade-long sluggish economy and refurnish major cities. In its implementation structure and logic, the policy is commonly seen as a Japanese version of neo-liberal urban policies in the West, especially U.S. and U.K. Yet, this paper asserts that Japanese urban regeneration is on the track of developmental state, distancing itself from the major western urban theories that focus on the neo-liberal trend and globalization effect. Urban development in Japan is considerably subject to the patterned policies molded by the linkage among politicians, bureaucrats and interest groups that has been consolidated in the high growth period. Unlike neo-liberal trend, the central government take a substantial policy initiative against local governments and private sectors. In a framework of political clientelism, the relation between central and local, and between public and private is interdependent rather than competitive. In conclusion, even if there are many signs of malfunction and readjustment, urban development in Japan is still dominated by the long standing system of developmental state.키 워 드 도시재생정책, 발전국가, 도시개발, 일본Keywords Urban Pegeneration Policy, Developmental State, Urban Development, Japan

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 及川健二, "高層ビル亂立で得するのはだれ?" (430) : 8-11, 2002

    2 東京都, "首都移轉の再檢討について" 2001

    3 東京都, "首都圈メガロポリス構想" 2001

    4 "關西都市再生, 規制緩和で彈み(11.26)"

    5 原田泰, "都市間「競爭」のすすめ" 27-33, 2001

    6 福井秀夫, "都市再生私はこう考える" (430) : 13-14, 2002

    7 都市再生特別措置法硏究會, "都市再生特別措置法の解說" 東京: ぎゅうせい 2002

    8 石田賴房, "都市再生特別措置法․都市再開發法改正等に關する意見(參考人意見 陳述內容)" 2002

    9 大西隆, "都市再生法では都市は再生しない?" 54 (54): 3-16, 2002

    10 大西隆, "都市再生はゆくりと環境共生から" 448 : 8-16, 2002

    1 及川健二, "高層ビル亂立で得するのはだれ?" (430) : 8-11, 2002

    2 東京都, "首都移轉の再檢討について" 2001

    3 東京都, "首都圈メガロポリス構想" 2001

    4 "關西都市再生, 規制緩和で彈み(11.26)"

    5 原田泰, "都市間「競爭」のすすめ" 27-33, 2001

    6 福井秀夫, "都市再生私はこう考える" (430) : 13-14, 2002

    7 都市再生特別措置法硏究會, "都市再生特別措置法の解說" 東京: ぎゅうせい 2002

    8 石田賴房, "都市再生特別措置法․都市再開發法改正等に關する意見(參考人意見 陳述內容)" 2002

    9 大西隆, "都市再生法では都市は再生しない?" 54 (54): 3-16, 2002

    10 大西隆, "都市再生はゆくりと環境共生から" 448 : 8-16, 2002

    11 大方潤一郞, "都市再生と都市計劃" 93 (93): 17-36, 2002

    12 西村淸彦, "都市再生と日本經濟再生" 56 (56): 35-39, 2002

    13 森野美德, "都市再生, 地方との共同步調で" 2002

    14 "空きオフィスじわり增殖(2.4)"

    15 失作弘, "究極の「開發の自由」は何をもたらすのか" 241-250, 2002

    16 山家悠紀夫, "構造改革という幻想" 東京: 岩波書店 2001

    17 東京都, "東京の新しい都市づくりビジョン - 都市再生への確かな道筋" 2001

    18 大內力, "日本經濟論" 東京: 東京大學出版會 1963

    19 小泉秀樹, "地域發意と都市再生" 54 (54): 47-61, 2002

    20 本間義人, "土木國家の思想: 都市論の系譜" 東京: 日本經濟評論社 1996

    21 保母武彦, "公共事業をどう変えるか" 東京: 岩波書店 2001

    22 久慈力, "これでいいのか首都機能移轉" 東京: 綠風出版 1997

    23 Friedmann, J, "Where We Stand: a Decade of World City Research, in World Cities in a World System" Cambridge University Press 21-47, 1995

    24 Allmendinger, P, "Urban Planning and New Right" London and New York: Routledge 1998

    25 Rimmer, Peter J, "Urban Change and the International Economy: Japanese Construction Contractors and Developments under Three Administrations, in Pacific Rim Cities in the World Economy" New Jersey: Transaction Publishers 158-199, 1989

    26 Friedmann, J, "The World City Hypothesis" 17 : 69-83, 1986

    27 Parkinson, M, "The Thatcher Government's Urban Policy, 1979-1989" 60 (60): 421-440, 1989

    28 Oc, T, "The London Doclands Development Corporation(LDDC), 1981-1991: A Perspective in the Management of Urban Regeneration" 64 (64): 311-330, 1991

    29 Sassen, S, "The Global Cities: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton" New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1991

    30 Machimura, T, "Symbolic Use of Globalization in Urban Politics in Tokyo" 22 (22): 183-194, 1997

    31 Healey, P, "Structure and Agency in Land and Property Development Processes: Some Ideas for Research" 27 (27): 89-104, 1990

    32 Pickvance, C, "State Restructuring and Local Power: A Comparative Perspective" London: Pinter 1991

    33 Hill, Richard C, "State Restructuring and Local Power in Japan" 37 (37): 673-690, 2000

    34 Pempel, T.J, "Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy" New York: Cornell University Press 1998

    35 Fainstein, Susan, "Promoting Economic Development : Urban Planning in the United Stated and Great Britain" 57 (57): 22-33, 1991

    36 Fujita, Kuniko, "Neo-industrial Tokyo: Urban Development and Globalization in Japan's State-centered Developmental Capitalism" 40 (40): 249-281, 2003

    37 Johnson, Chalmers, "MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975" Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press 1982

    38 Muramatsu, M, "Local Power in the Japanese State" Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press 1997

    39 Judd, D.R, "Leadership and Urban Regeneration: Cities in North America and Europe" Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Pub 1990

    40 Woodall, B, "Japan under Construction: Corruption, Politics and Public Works" University of California Press 1996

    41 Short, J.R, "Globalization and the City" Harlow: Longman 1999

    42 Saito, A, "Global City Formation in a Capitalist Developmental State: Tokyo and the Waterfront Sub-centre Project" 40 (40): 283-308, 2003

    43 Hill, Richard C, "Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul" 37 (37): 2167-2195, 2000

    44 McCormack, Gavan, "Emptiness of Japanese Affluence" New York: M.E. Sharpe 1996

    45 Calder, K. E, "Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan, 1949-1986" New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1988

    46 Fuyuno, Ichiko, "Concrete Plans" 2001

    47 Thrift, N, "Cities without modernity, cities with magic" 113 : 138-149, 1997

    48 Sakakibara, Eisuke, "Beyond Capitalism: The Japanese Model of Market Economics" New York, University Press of America 1993

    49 O'Leary, J, "Between State and Capital: Third Sector Organizational Development in Tokyo" 26 : 317-337, 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-06-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : korea Planners Association -> Journal of Korea Planning Association
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한국토ㆍ도시계획학회 -> 대한국토·도시계획학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.86 0.86 0.96
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.94 0.94 1.343 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼