RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    특집 논문 : 사회적 경제와 한국시민사회의 과제 ; 한국 사회적경제(Social Economy)의 현황과 과제 -사회적경제의 정착과정을 중심으로- = Social Economy in Korea : Definition and Application

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5089691

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aims of this article are to 1) provide an overview of the different interpretations on the concept <Social Economy in Korea>, confused with the concepts <Third Sector> or <Non-Profit Sector>; 2) evaluate the force and weakness of Social Economy in Korea; 3) propose the future strategies of social economy organizations(SEO) in job creation for low income families through alternative principles of work and management. With social economy implemented by cooperatives, mutual associations, associations, foundations, and charity, voluntary and non-profit organizations, European countries have its own history, legal framework, and dynamic political, economic and social system. Against this tradition, there emerged a heterogeneous set of initiatives, promoting numerous objectives. Their main aims are to provide goods and services in response to new requirements, to try to integrate disadvantaged people into the labour market. They require a range of resources combined in different ways: commercial income, public financing, donations, subscriptions, loans, non-monetary contributions and voluntary contributions. They make up ``the Third Sector``, a cohesive whole which signals dynamism and interaction with the public and for-profit private sectors. In Korea, the law for the creation of social enterprise, promulgated in December 2006, promote the movement of associations and cooperatives who want to participate in the competition for public resources. This situation incite the activists also to resist against this trend and search the alternative strategies. However it will be important, for this, to find an identity of social economy in Korea and to develop the potential of their organizations. The problem is an difficulty for application of two principles in social economy: 1) limit the pursuit of private and individual profit, 2) emphasize the democratic decision making or the self-management tradition in the organizations. Difficult, because we must do it, with poor unemployeds whose employability is generally very low and also with weak tradition of korean social economy sector. There are certain problems in the policies for the creation of social enterprise in our country. It is the generation of low wage jobs, the hollowing out of social economy tradition, and the difficulty of control and management of quality and cost of the services. Despite of these problems, the movement of social economy in Korea has certainly a potential to create the social enterprises and to propose the alternative paradigm which can play in difficult socio-economic situation. This is 1) to build local social capital through civic engagement, 2) to create the jobs with an alternative methode.
    번역하기

    The aims of this article are to 1) provide an overview of the different interpretations on the concept <Social Economy in Korea>, confused with the concepts <Third Sector> or <Non-Profit Sector>; 2) evaluate the force and weakness of...

    The aims of this article are to 1) provide an overview of the different interpretations on the concept <Social Economy in Korea>, confused with the concepts <Third Sector> or <Non-Profit Sector>; 2) evaluate the force and weakness of Social Economy in Korea; 3) propose the future strategies of social economy organizations(SEO) in job creation for low income families through alternative principles of work and management. With social economy implemented by cooperatives, mutual associations, associations, foundations, and charity, voluntary and non-profit organizations, European countries have its own history, legal framework, and dynamic political, economic and social system. Against this tradition, there emerged a heterogeneous set of initiatives, promoting numerous objectives. Their main aims are to provide goods and services in response to new requirements, to try to integrate disadvantaged people into the labour market. They require a range of resources combined in different ways: commercial income, public financing, donations, subscriptions, loans, non-monetary contributions and voluntary contributions. They make up ``the Third Sector``, a cohesive whole which signals dynamism and interaction with the public and for-profit private sectors. In Korea, the law for the creation of social enterprise, promulgated in December 2006, promote the movement of associations and cooperatives who want to participate in the competition for public resources. This situation incite the activists also to resist against this trend and search the alternative strategies. However it will be important, for this, to find an identity of social economy in Korea and to develop the potential of their organizations. The problem is an difficulty for application of two principles in social economy: 1) limit the pursuit of private and individual profit, 2) emphasize the democratic decision making or the self-management tradition in the organizations. Difficult, because we must do it, with poor unemployeds whose employability is generally very low and also with weak tradition of korean social economy sector. There are certain problems in the policies for the creation of social enterprise in our country. It is the generation of low wage jobs, the hollowing out of social economy tradition, and the difficulty of control and management of quality and cost of the services. Despite of these problems, the movement of social economy in Korea has certainly a potential to create the social enterprises and to propose the alternative paradigm which can play in difficult socio-economic situation. This is 1) to build local social capital through civic engagement, 2) to create the jobs with an alternative methode.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼