RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자기기만의 진화론적 해석 = Evolutionary Interpretations of Self-Deception

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5046477

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper draws on the problem whether the evolutionary theory of adaptation could explain how the psychological phenomenon of self-deception works. The successful self-deception is even imaginary phenomenon externally, but it can be kept with highly internal consistency since it is treated as very actual and real thing for myself. Self-deception is the process or fact of misleading ourselves to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid. Self-deception is a way we justify false beliefs to ourselves. Greenwald explains the self-deception through his concept beneffectance, which is selectively perceived as responsible for desired, but not undesired, outcomes. Since then, evolutionary psychologists have, beyond the shadow of a doubt, interpreted the self-deception entirely as the theory of adaptation. According to the theory of adaptation, self-deceit is natural, that is, not only not pathological but positively beneficial to organism as they navigate their natural and social environments in the struggle for existence. On the contrary, in my article I sketched the another interpretations beyond theory of adaptation which had became a dominant interpretation. I conclude that self-deception may be not an adaptation, but a byproduct of human cognitive traits.
    번역하기

    This paper draws on the problem whether the evolutionary theory of adaptation could explain how the psychological phenomenon of self-deception works. The successful self-deception is even imaginary phenomenon externally, but it can be kept with highly...

    This paper draws on the problem whether the evolutionary theory of adaptation could explain how the psychological phenomenon of self-deception works. The successful self-deception is even imaginary phenomenon externally, but it can be kept with highly internal consistency since it is treated as very actual and real thing for myself. Self-deception is the process or fact of misleading ourselves to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid. Self-deception is a way we justify false beliefs to ourselves. Greenwald explains the self-deception through his concept beneffectance, which is selectively perceived as responsible for desired, but not undesired, outcomes. Since then, evolutionary psychologists have, beyond the shadow of a doubt, interpreted the self-deception entirely as the theory of adaptation. According to the theory of adaptation, self-deceit is natural, that is, not only not pathological but positively beneficial to organism as they navigate their natural and social environments in the struggle for existence. On the contrary, in my article I sketched the another interpretations beyond theory of adaptation which had became a dominant interpretation. I conclude that self-deception may be not an adaptation, but a byproduct of human cognitive traits.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 다윈, 찰스, "적응과 제한의 상보성;면역학의 결핍, 애국심의 충만-한국의 생명복제기술(인간과 동물의 감정 표현에 대하여)" 서해문집 5 (5):

    2 라이트, 로버트, "도덕적 동물" 사이언스 북스 2003

    3 Livingstone Smith, David, "Why we lie: the evolutionary roots of deception and the unconscious mind" St.Martin’s press 2004

    4 Greenwald, A. G, "The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history" 35 : 1980

    5 Gould, S.J, "The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm" (205) : 1978

    6 Buss, David M, "The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology" Wiley 2005

    7 Trivers, R, "Sociobiology and politics(In Sociobiology and Human Politics)" Lexington 1981

    8 Trivers, R, "Social Evolution" Menlo Park, Califonia:Benjamin / Cummings 1985

    9 Sterelny, K, "Sex and Death" Chicago: The Univ. Chicago Press 1999

    10 Trivers,R, "Natural Selection and Social Theory" New York: Oxford Univ.Press 2002

    1 다윈, 찰스, "적응과 제한의 상보성;면역학의 결핍, 애국심의 충만-한국의 생명복제기술(인간과 동물의 감정 표현에 대하여)" 서해문집 5 (5):

    2 라이트, 로버트, "도덕적 동물" 사이언스 북스 2003

    3 Livingstone Smith, David, "Why we lie: the evolutionary roots of deception and the unconscious mind" St.Martin’s press 2004

    4 Greenwald, A. G, "The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history" 35 : 1980

    5 Gould, S.J, "The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm" (205) : 1978

    6 Buss, David M, "The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology" Wiley 2005

    7 Trivers, R, "Sociobiology and politics(In Sociobiology and Human Politics)" Lexington 1981

    8 Trivers, R, "Social Evolution" Menlo Park, Califonia:Benjamin / Cummings 1985

    9 Sterelny, K, "Sex and Death" Chicago: The Univ. Chicago Press 1999

    10 Trivers,R, "Natural Selection and Social Theory" New York: Oxford Univ.Press 2002

    11 Han, H.-Y.(한호연), "Molecular phylogeny of the superfamily Tephritoidea (Insecta: Diptera): new evidence from the mitochondrial 12S, 16S, and COIIgenes" 1999

    12 Wrangham,R, "Is Military incompetence adaptive?" 20 : 1999

    13 Badcock, Christopher, "Evolutionary psychology" Polity 2000

    14 Gould, S.J, "Evolutionary Psychology: An Exchange" 44 (44): 1997

    15 Trivers, R, "Elements of a scientific theory of self-deception" (907) : 2000

    16 Trivers, R, "Deceit and self-deception: the relationship between communication and consciousness(In: Man and Beast)" Smithsonian, Washington 175-191, 1991

    17 Cosmides, L, "Cognitive adaptations for social exchange(In: The Adapted Mind)" Oxford 1992

    18 Buller,J.David, "Adapting Minds" MIT Press 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-10-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : A semiannually Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea -> EPOCH AND PHILOSOPHY -A Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea- KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.61 0.61 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.66 0.62 1.3 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼