RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    과학영재학생의 사고양식 유형과 학업성취 및 과학개념과의 관계 분석 = Analysis on the Relationship between Gifted Science Students` Thinking Style Types and Academic Achievement and Science Concepts

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45048710

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    On the basis of Sternberg`s theory of mental self-government, this study examined the relationship between thinking styles and academic achievement of gifted science students and their earth science concepts by the different types of thinking styles. The participants were 120 students from the Busan Science Academy who were selected through the multi-step examinations for the school entrance. All participants responded to Sternberg`s Thinking Styles Inventory which is a self-report test consisting of 65 items on 13 subscales, with a 5-point Likert-Type scale. In order to examine the gifted science students` earth science concepts by the types of thinking style, the responses in descriptive items for 40 students were analyzed . The results are as follows. First, gifted science students prefer the legislative, judicial, anarchic, global, external, and liberal styles, whereas. general students prefer the executive, oligarchic, and conservative styles. This result shows that gifted science students tend to not only exhibit schoolhouse giftedness but also creativeproductive giftedness. Second, gifted science students` academic achievement was more significantly correlated with the thinking styles than those of general students. Third. the Type Ⅰ thinking style group proved to process more complex concepts; on the other hand, the Type Ⅱ thinking style group proved to process simpler concepts in earth science. This indicates that Type Ⅰ thinking style students use deep learning approaches whereas Type Ⅱ thinking style students use surface learning approaches.
    번역하기

    On the basis of Sternberg`s theory of mental self-government, this study examined the relationship between thinking styles and academic achievement of gifted science students and their earth science concepts by the different types of thinking styles. ...

    On the basis of Sternberg`s theory of mental self-government, this study examined the relationship between thinking styles and academic achievement of gifted science students and their earth science concepts by the different types of thinking styles. The participants were 120 students from the Busan Science Academy who were selected through the multi-step examinations for the school entrance. All participants responded to Sternberg`s Thinking Styles Inventory which is a self-report test consisting of 65 items on 13 subscales, with a 5-point Likert-Type scale. In order to examine the gifted science students` earth science concepts by the types of thinking style, the responses in descriptive items for 40 students were analyzed . The results are as follows. First, gifted science students prefer the legislative, judicial, anarchic, global, external, and liberal styles, whereas. general students prefer the executive, oligarchic, and conservative styles. This result shows that gifted science students tend to not only exhibit schoolhouse giftedness but also creativeproductive giftedness. Second, gifted science students` academic achievement was more significantly correlated with the thinking styles than those of general students. Third. the Type Ⅰ thinking style group proved to process more complex concepts; on the other hand, the Type Ⅱ thinking style group proved to process simpler concepts in earth science. This indicates that Type Ⅰ thinking style students use deep learning approaches whereas Type Ⅱ thinking style students use surface learning approaches.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼