RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소설창작의 평가 기준에 관한 연구 = A Study on The Evaluation Standard For Story Writing Learners

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76482890

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper is aiming at providing story writing learners with an evalua- tion standard after their rough drafts. The standard is provided from the thought that story writing has the characteristics of novel as a genre and it is also an interactive communicative text in which writers' desires meet readers' expectations.
    The evaluation standard as a genre is divided into two levels, story and expression. How much the characters, plot and setting in the story level, and the point of view and sentences(dialogs and narratives) in the expression level can contribute to the creation of the story meaning are the bases of the evaluation standard.
    The bases of the communicative standard are preciseness as an evidence of interpreting the story, congruity of the way writer provides information to readers, and relevance being able to draw a consistent interpretation of the story. All these standards are focused on how much the writer's intention accords with readers' expectations.
    Considering the process of reading his own draft for correction for story writing learner as an act including reading from both reader's standpoint and writer's, this paper provides the standards in the place where the genre evaluation standard interacts with the communicative standard.
    First, the reading from a reader's standpoint is considered as a synthetic evaluation. With the unity as an evaluation basis the standards of evaluating the story level and the expression level are provided. Next, considering the step of examining the causes of the problems found through the synthetic evaluation as an analytic evaluation by reading from writer's standpoint, the standards of evaluating the story level and the expression level specifically are provided on the bases of preciseness and congruity.
    This paper can be a specific evaluation standard in an interactive place between the standard of genre and that of communicative. And this standard can be a useful way of evaluating works in story writing classes, having writing learners see their works objectively and modify them in a meta-cognitive activity, and furthermore offer writing learner colleagues a frame of providing diagnostic information.
    번역하기

    This paper is aiming at providing story writing learners with an evalua- tion standard after their rough drafts. The standard is provided from the thought that story writing has the characteristics of novel as a genre and it is also an interactive com...

    This paper is aiming at providing story writing learners with an evalua- tion standard after their rough drafts. The standard is provided from the thought that story writing has the characteristics of novel as a genre and it is also an interactive communicative text in which writers' desires meet readers' expectations.
    The evaluation standard as a genre is divided into two levels, story and expression. How much the characters, plot and setting in the story level, and the point of view and sentences(dialogs and narratives) in the expression level can contribute to the creation of the story meaning are the bases of the evaluation standard.
    The bases of the communicative standard are preciseness as an evidence of interpreting the story, congruity of the way writer provides information to readers, and relevance being able to draw a consistent interpretation of the story. All these standards are focused on how much the writer's intention accords with readers' expectations.
    Considering the process of reading his own draft for correction for story writing learner as an act including reading from both reader's standpoint and writer's, this paper provides the standards in the place where the genre evaluation standard interacts with the communicative standard.
    First, the reading from a reader's standpoint is considered as a synthetic evaluation. With the unity as an evaluation basis the standards of evaluating the story level and the expression level are provided. Next, considering the step of examining the causes of the problems found through the synthetic evaluation as an analytic evaluation by reading from writer's standpoint, the standards of evaluating the story level and the expression level specifically are provided on the bases of preciseness and congruity.
    This paper can be a specific evaluation standard in an interactive place between the standard of genre and that of communicative. And this standard can be a useful way of evaluating works in story writing classes, having writing learners see their works objectively and modify them in a meta-cognitive activity, and furthermore offer writing learner colleagues a frame of providing diagnostic information.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 소설창작의 평가 준거
    • Ⅲ. 평가 기준의 설정
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 참 고 문 헌
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 소설창작의 평가 준거
    • Ⅲ. 평가 기준의 설정
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 참 고 문 헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "읽기교육의 원리와 방법" 박이정 2001

    2 "읽기 교육의 이해" 우리교육 1997

    3 "유혹하는 글쓰기" 김영사 2002

    4 "쓰기수업방법" 박이정 1998

    5 "수사학 독서와 작문의 이론" 신구문화사 2003

    6 "소설학 사전" 고려원 1992

    7 "소설창작 12강" 예림기획 2001

    8 "소설의 이해" 문예출판사 2000

    9 "소설의 기술" 책세상 1997

    10 "소설쓰기의 이론과 실제" 한길사 1994

    1 "읽기교육의 원리와 방법" 박이정 2001

    2 "읽기 교육의 이해" 우리교육 1997

    3 "유혹하는 글쓰기" 김영사 2002

    4 "쓰기수업방법" 박이정 1998

    5 "수사학 독서와 작문의 이론" 신구문화사 2003

    6 "소설학 사전" 고려원 1992

    7 "소설창작 12강" 예림기획 2001

    8 "소설의 이해" 문예출판사 2000

    9 "소설의 기술" 책세상 1997

    10 "소설쓰기의 이론과 실제" 한길사 1994

    11 "소설감상방법론연구" 서울대학교출판부 1995

    12 "소설가를 꿈꾸는 당신을 위하여" 한국문화사 2000

    13 "문학 이해의 구조" 예림기획 1999

    14 "당신도 소설을 쓸 수 있다" 문학사상사 1991

    15 "논리적 독서법" 예림기획 1997

    16 "글쓰기의 문제해결전략" 동문선 1995

    17 "글쓰기와 글쓰기교육" 서울대학교출판부 2001

    18 "과정 중심 작문 평가" 원미사 2003

    19 "Techique in Fiction" New York Harper & Row 1964

    20 "A Short Story Writer’s Companion" New York, Oxford University Press 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.31 0.31 0.28
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.3 0.32 0.556 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼