목적 : 치매노인 가족간호제공자의 가족관계유형에 따른 간호제공 상황평가, 소진경험 및 대처유형의 차이를 비교, 분석하고자 한다. 방법 : 2002년 1월부터 6월까지 B시 15개 보건소와 7개 복...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104807107
2004
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
39-51(13쪽)
17
0
상세조회0
다운로드목적 : 치매노인 가족간호제공자의 가족관계유형에 따른 간호제공 상황평가, 소진경험 및 대처유형의 차이를 비교, 분석하고자 한다. 방법 : 2002년 1월부터 6월까지 B시 15개 보건소와 7개 복...
목적 : 치매노인 가족간호제공자의 가족관계유형에 따른 간호제공 상황평가, 소진경험 및 대처유형의 차이를 비교, 분석하고자 한다. 방법 : 2002년 1월부터 6월까지 B시 15개 보건소와 7개 복지관, 1개의 대학병원 신경과에 등록되어 있는 치매노인을 돌보는 가족간호제공자 중 연구 참여에 동의한 67명을 대상으로 직접 면담을 통한 구조화된 설문지를 작성하였다. 수집된 자료는 기술통계와 ANOVA로 분석하였다. 결과 : 치매노인을 돌보는 가족간호제공자의 간호 제공 상황에 대해 스트레스 상황으로 평가하는 경향은 며느리군에서 가장 높았고 성인자녀 군에서는 가장 낮은 경향이 있어 그룹 간 유의한 차이를 나타내었다(F=3.52, p=.04). 간호제공과 관련한 소진경험에 대해서는 배우자 군이 가장 높은 수준의 ‘정서적 고갈’을 보고하였으며 다음으로 며느리군, 성인자녀군순으로 나타났다(F=9.89, p=.00). 대처유형에 대해서는 긍정적인 대처전략인 ‘인지적 재구성적 대처’와 ‘문제중심 적 대처’를 며느리 군에서 가장 많이 활용하는 반면에 배우자 군에서 가장 적게 활용함으로써 집단간의 유의한 차이가 있었다(F=3.36, p=.04 ; F=5.08, p=.01). 결론 : 가족간호제공자의 간호수혜자와의 가족관계유형에 따라 간호제공상황에서 경험하는 소진정도와 활용하는 대처전략에 차이가 있다. 따라서 가족간호제공자를 위한 간호중재의 모색에서는 환자와의 관계를 우선적으로 파악해야하며 특히 배우자간호제공자의 정서적 고갈을 낮추고 긍정적인 대처전략의 활용을 증진시킬 수 있는 구체적인 방안마련이 필요하다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Purpose : To examine the differences in appraisal, coping, and burnout according to the types of relationship with the care-recipient among family caregivers of older adults with dementia. Method : A descriptive cross-sectional design with random sam...
Purpose : To examine the differences in appraisal, coping, and burnout according to the types of relationship with the care-recipient among family caregivers of older adults with dementia. Method : A descriptive cross-sectional design with random sample was used. Sixty-seven family caregivers were divided into three groups (spouses, adult childrens, daughters-in-law). Measures were included appraisal of caregiving scale, coping strategies inventory, and maslach burnout inventory. ANOVAs were used to identify differences among three groups. Results : There were group differences in subscales in caregiving appraisal and in burnout. Daughter-in-law group reported the highest general stress caregiving appraisal and adult children group reported the lowest (F=3.52, p=.04). Spouse group reported the highest emotional exhaustion and children group reported the lowest emotional exhaustion (F=9.89, p=.00). For the coping strategies, daughter-in-law group utilized cognitive reconstructioning and problem focused coping strategies more often than spouse and adult children groups (F=3.36, p=.04 ; F=5.08, p=.01). Conclusion : These findings suggest that special attention is needed for spouse caregivers because the impact of emotional exhaustion could be interrupt the using of effective coping strategies of spouse. Specialized nursing intervention considering specific types of family relationship to the care-recipient could be helpful to promote their coping strategies in caregiving situation.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Harper, "and daughters caring for institutionalized dementia and non-institutionalized dementia patients towards a model for caregiving burden International Journal of Aging and Human Development" 241-262, 1990
2 Song, J.A.,, "The theory and technique of family therapy" How Publishing Company 1997
3 & Jackson, "The measurement of experienced burnout Journal of Occupational Behavior" 99-113, 1981
4 Seltzer, M.M.,, "The Dynamics of Caregiving Transitions During a Three-Year Prospective Study" 40 (40): 165-178, 2000
5 Horowitz,A, "Sons and daughters as caregivers to older parents:Differences in role performance and consequences" 25 : 612-617, 1985
6 England,M, "Sense of relatedness and interpersonal network of adult offerspring caregivers : linkages with crisis, emotional arousal, and perceived health" 10 (10): 85-95, 1996
7 Katz, "Progress in the development of the index of ADL" 20-30, 1970
8 Lee, H. J.,, "Predictors of burnout among informal caregivers of olders adults: Using Discriminant analysis" 29 (29): 585-595, 1999
9 Lachman, M.E.,, "Multiple paths of midlife development" University of Chicago Press 1997
10 Kwon, "Measuring the caregiver burden of caring for the demented elderly University of Yonsei" Unpublished doctoral dissertation 1994
1 Harper, "and daughters caring for institutionalized dementia and non-institutionalized dementia patients towards a model for caregiving burden International Journal of Aging and Human Development" 241-262, 1990
2 Song, J.A.,, "The theory and technique of family therapy" How Publishing Company 1997
3 & Jackson, "The measurement of experienced burnout Journal of Occupational Behavior" 99-113, 1981
4 Seltzer, M.M.,, "The Dynamics of Caregiving Transitions During a Three-Year Prospective Study" 40 (40): 165-178, 2000
5 Horowitz,A, "Sons and daughters as caregivers to older parents:Differences in role performance and consequences" 25 : 612-617, 1985
6 England,M, "Sense of relatedness and interpersonal network of adult offerspring caregivers : linkages with crisis, emotional arousal, and perceived health" 10 (10): 85-95, 1996
7 Katz, "Progress in the development of the index of ADL" 20-30, 1970
8 Lee, H. J.,, "Predictors of burnout among informal caregivers of olders adults: Using Discriminant analysis" 29 (29): 585-595, 1999
9 Lachman, M.E.,, "Multiple paths of midlife development" University of Chicago Press 1997
10 Kwon, "Measuring the caregiver burden of caring for the demented elderly University of Yonsei" Unpublished doctoral dissertation 1994
11 Mckinlay, "Informal care for frail elders The role of secondary caregivers" 677-683, 1989
12 Knop, D.S.,, "In Sickness and in health : an exploration of the perceived quality of the marital relationship, coping, and depression in caregivers of spouses with Alzheimer's disease" 36 (36): 16-21, 1998
13 Hoyert,D.L, "Factors related to the well-being and life activities of family caregivers" 41 : 74-81, 1992
14 "Differences in Familism Values and Caregiving Outcomes Among Korean, Korean American, and White American Dementia Caregivers" 14 (14): 355-364, 1999
15 Kim,J.S, "Daughters-in-law in Korean cargiving families" 36 (36): 399-408, 2001
16 Merrill, "Daughters-in-law as caregivers to the elderly Research on Aging" 70-91, 1993
17 "Coping with conflict Research on Aging" 364-377, 1982
18 Braithwaite,V, "Contextual or General Stress Outcomes:Making Choices Through Caregiving Appraisals" 40 (40): 706-717, 2000
19 Kivett,V.R, "Consanguinity and Kin Level:Their relative importance to the helping network of older adults" 40 : 228-234, 1985
20 Dwyer, "Changes in the helping behaviors of adult children as caregivers Research on Aging" 351-375, 1992
21 Almberg, B.,, "Caring for a demented elderly person-burden and burnout among caregiving relatives" 25 (25): 109-116, 1997
22 Ingersoll-Dayton, B.,, "Caregiving for parents and parents-in-law: Is gender important?" 36 (36): 483-491, 1996
23 Barnes, "Caregivers of elderly relatives" 1992
24 George,L.K, "Caregiver well-being:a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults" 26 : 253-259, 1986
25 Elliott, T.R.,, "Caregiver social problem-solving abilities and family member adjustment to recent-onset physical disability" 44 (44): 104-123, 1999
26 Jones S.L, "Caregiver Burden : The experience of parents, children, siblings and spouses of people with mental illness" 20 (20): 84-87, 1997
27 Ceslowitz,S.B, "Burnout and coping strategies among hospital staff nurse" 14 (14): 553-558, 1989
28 Oberst, "Appraisal of Caregiving Scale description Available from Marilyn T Wayne State University at Michigan" 1991
29 Carey, "Appraisal and careigiving burden in family members caring for patient receiving chemotherapy" 1341-1348, 1991
미국 여성노인의 우울증에 영향을 미치는 요인: 배우자 유무에 따른 비교를 중심으로
안전사고 예방프로그램이 저소득 여성노인의 안전사고에 대한 지식, 태도, 및 예방행위에 미치는 효과
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2000-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.72 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.84 | 2.08 | 2.242 | 0.19 |