RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      외식산업의 성과측정항목의 가중치 개발: 국내 패밀리 레스토랑을 중심으로 = Determinants of Relative Weights on Financial and Non-Financial Performance Measures in Foodservice Industry: Focused on the Family Restaurant in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104915113

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Measuring and evaluating the business performance plays a very important role in managing the business.
      This study tried to propose a novel point of prospective and method in which the performance evaluation in any family restaurant should be illuminated and be performed.
      In this study, BSC provided the main conceptional framework for evaluating the performance of a family restaurant. Furthermore, this study verified the validity of the proposed performance evaluation method through specific case analysis and used AHP to quantify its validity objectively.
      Finally, this study found the fact that non-financial prospectives, compared to financial prospectives, should be more importantly considered as the performance evaluation index of the family restaurants. Most of all, the study showed that the proportion of performance evaluation indexes related to Customers prospective and Learning and Growth prospective revealed very highly, therefore variables such as customer satisfaction index, per employee productivity, education and training, customer response rate, employee satisfaction index should be emphasized as key factors when it comes to the process of selecting indexes and measuring their performance evaluation of the business.
      번역하기

      Measuring and evaluating the business performance plays a very important role in managing the business. This study tried to propose a novel point of prospective and method in which the performance evaluation in any family restaurant should be illumin...

      Measuring and evaluating the business performance plays a very important role in managing the business.
      This study tried to propose a novel point of prospective and method in which the performance evaluation in any family restaurant should be illuminated and be performed.
      In this study, BSC provided the main conceptional framework for evaluating the performance of a family restaurant. Furthermore, this study verified the validity of the proposed performance evaluation method through specific case analysis and used AHP to quantify its validity objectively.
      Finally, this study found the fact that non-financial prospectives, compared to financial prospectives, should be more importantly considered as the performance evaluation index of the family restaurants. Most of all, the study showed that the proportion of performance evaluation indexes related to Customers prospective and Learning and Growth prospective revealed very highly, therefore variables such as customer satisfaction index, per employee productivity, education and training, customer response rate, employee satisfaction index should be emphasized as key factors when it comes to the process of selecting indexes and measuring their performance evaluation of the business.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "패밀리레스토랑 브랜드별 선택속성 차이분석" 5 (5): 91-108, 2002

      2 "지식기반조직체에서의 재무적 비재무적 성과측정항목의 가중치 개발에 관한 연구" 서강대학교 경영학연구원 10 : 17-48, 1999

      3 "성과 측정 시스템의 과거 현재 그리고 미래" 11 (11): 2000

      4 "분석적 계층화과정의 본질 및 연구동향의 고찰" 157-164, 1997

      5 "계층화분석과정(AHP) 을 활용한 패밀리레스토랑의 인력관리" 5 : 91-108, 2002

      6 "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" 75-85, 1996a

      7 "Use of Non-Financial Performance Measures Journal of Cost Management" 31-33, 1992

      8 "The Balanced Scorecard : Translating Strategy into Action" Harvard Business School Press 1996

      9 "The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance" 71-79, 1992

      10 "Performance Measurement : Lessons Learned for Development Management." 23 (23): 1303-1315, 1995

      1 "패밀리레스토랑 브랜드별 선택속성 차이분석" 5 (5): 91-108, 2002

      2 "지식기반조직체에서의 재무적 비재무적 성과측정항목의 가중치 개발에 관한 연구" 서강대학교 경영학연구원 10 : 17-48, 1999

      3 "성과 측정 시스템의 과거 현재 그리고 미래" 11 (11): 2000

      4 "분석적 계층화과정의 본질 및 연구동향의 고찰" 157-164, 1997

      5 "계층화분석과정(AHP) 을 활용한 패밀리레스토랑의 인력관리" 5 : 91-108, 2002

      6 "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" 75-85, 1996a

      7 "Use of Non-Financial Performance Measures Journal of Cost Management" 31-33, 1992

      8 "The Balanced Scorecard : Translating Strategy into Action" Harvard Business School Press 1996

      9 "The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance" 71-79, 1992

      10 "Performance Measurement : Lessons Learned for Development Management." 23 (23): 1303-1315, 1995

      11 "Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy" 39 (39): 53-79, 1996b

      12 "AHP를 이용한 측정과 평가" 서강대학교 경영학연구원 7 : 63-93, 1996

      13 "?외식산업의 이해?" 백산출판사 2000

      14 "?외식기업의 성과평가에서의 BSC 도입 방법론 검토?" 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.45 2.45 2.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.48 2.37 2.735 0.62
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼