RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기호유학의 현대적 조망 : 외암과 남당의 미발론이 갖는 도덕철학상의 배경 = A Study on moral philosophical foundation of Woiam and Namdang`s weifa(未發) theories

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45030038

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Modern scholars agree on that philosophy which Chu Hsi settled after his age of 40 is fundamentally new Confucianism. Nevertheless, once examined whether it is truly difterent from early Confucianism, we are bound to realise there are some points that were much to be desired or not yet decided in Neo-Confucianism. Even though Chu Hsi`s creative theory on weifa(未發) is one of the decisive factors to divide Neo-Confucianism from other parties of Confucianism, it also has possibility to be not perfect or not yet decided. It is supported with the fact that able Neo-Confucianists raised two interpretations on the theory on weifa of Neo-Confucianism. This thesis argues on moral philosophical foundation of two interpretations that Woiam Yi Gan and Namdang Han Wonjin suggested and disputed on weifa theroy of Neo-Confucianism. In contrast to former weifa` theory was in a field of metaphysics, Chu Hsi`s weifa theory is in a field of physics. This means that weifa that functions as a stronghold of moral actions descended from metaphysics to physics. An arguing point is that physics is in a field of qi(氣) and qi has good and evil. If we admit that a thing not genuine goodness and having good and evil is a the great foundation, moral philosophy will be in a great trouble. A different weifa theory of Woiam and Namdang come substantially from their alternatives for this issue. Researches on the weifa theory of Woiam and Namdang have focused on their assertions and data. This is the time to explain that `how two different weifa theories were originated?` or `what are the philosophical grounds of two weifa theories?` This thesis is the one of those attempts. As long as I concerned, Namdang tried to secure truly goodness in the weifa only based on li(理) not relying on qi, on the other hand Woiam tried to secure truly goodness of weifa of the great ground from the purity of natural qi. Based on these, Woiam and Namdang` settlement of weifa theroy arised from Pure Moralism, try to establish a fundamentally pure field of moral, and Pan-Moralism, admits that a basis of `distinction` or `difference` is on qi and not approve that `distinction` or `difference` on li.
    번역하기

    Modern scholars agree on that philosophy which Chu Hsi settled after his age of 40 is fundamentally new Confucianism. Nevertheless, once examined whether it is truly difterent from early Confucianism, we are bound to realise there are some points that...

    Modern scholars agree on that philosophy which Chu Hsi settled after his age of 40 is fundamentally new Confucianism. Nevertheless, once examined whether it is truly difterent from early Confucianism, we are bound to realise there are some points that were much to be desired or not yet decided in Neo-Confucianism. Even though Chu Hsi`s creative theory on weifa(未發) is one of the decisive factors to divide Neo-Confucianism from other parties of Confucianism, it also has possibility to be not perfect or not yet decided. It is supported with the fact that able Neo-Confucianists raised two interpretations on the theory on weifa of Neo-Confucianism. This thesis argues on moral philosophical foundation of two interpretations that Woiam Yi Gan and Namdang Han Wonjin suggested and disputed on weifa theroy of Neo-Confucianism. In contrast to former weifa` theory was in a field of metaphysics, Chu Hsi`s weifa theory is in a field of physics. This means that weifa that functions as a stronghold of moral actions descended from metaphysics to physics. An arguing point is that physics is in a field of qi(氣) and qi has good and evil. If we admit that a thing not genuine goodness and having good and evil is a the great foundation, moral philosophy will be in a great trouble. A different weifa theory of Woiam and Namdang come substantially from their alternatives for this issue. Researches on the weifa theory of Woiam and Namdang have focused on their assertions and data. This is the time to explain that `how two different weifa theories were originated?` or `what are the philosophical grounds of two weifa theories?` This thesis is the one of those attempts. As long as I concerned, Namdang tried to secure truly goodness in the weifa only based on li(理) not relying on qi, on the other hand Woiam tried to secure truly goodness of weifa of the great ground from the purity of natural qi. Based on these, Woiam and Namdang` settlement of weifa theroy arised from Pure Moralism, try to establish a fundamentally pure field of moral, and Pan-Moralism, admits that a basis of `distinction` or `difference` is on qi and not approve that `distinction` or `difference` on li.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "朱子言論同異攷"

    2 Lai, "How the Principle Rides on the Ether Chu Hsi's Non-Buddhistic Resolution of Nature and Emotion Journal of Chinese Philosophy 11" ho (ho): 1984

    1 "朱子言論同異攷"

    2 Lai, "How the Principle Rides on the Ether Chu Hsi's Non-Buddhistic Resolution of Nature and Emotion Journal of Chinese Philosophy 11" ho (ho): 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 동양철학연구(Journal of Eastern Philosophy) -> 동양철학연구
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Eastern Philosophy
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.54 0.54 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.55 0.54 1.394 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼