RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      자발적 조직행동에 관한 개념적 고찰 = A Study on the Organizational Citizenship Behavior

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45010703

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      To manage the work behavior of employees is essential for creating effective organizations. Work behavior includes several different kinds of employee behavior, and may be classified into in-role behavior and extra-role behavior. It is commonly accepted in the management literature that organizations need employees who are willing to exceed their formal job requirements. This kind of work behavior goes beyond traditional job performance and is necessary for long-term organizational effectiveness. In the last decade, many terms have been used to describe such behavior including organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Graham, 1991; Organ, 1988, 1990; Schnake, 1991), prosocial organizational behavior (Brief & Motowidlo, 1986; ), extra-role behavior (Van Dyne & Cummings, 1990; Werner, 1994), and organizational spontaneity (George & Brief, 1992).
      Nearly three decades ago, Katz (1964) identified three basic types of behavior essential for a functioning organization: attracting and holding people in the system, dependable role performance; and innovative and spontaneous behavior. Concerning this third category, Katz noted, "An organization which depends solely upon its blueprints of prescribed behavior is a very fragile social system"(p.132).
      Roethlisberger and Dickson (1964) noted that cooperation refers to something other than productivity. Productivity is regarded as a function of the formal organization (the authority structure, role specification, technology) and the "logic of facts". Cooperation, on the other hand, refers to acts that serve more of a maintenance purpose, to "maintain internal equilibrium." Cooperation thus includes day-to-day spontaneous prosocial gestures of individual accommodation to the work needs of others (e.g., co-workers, supervisor, clients in other departments (Smith et al., (1983) p.653). Every factory, office, or bureau depends daily on a myriad of acts of cooperation, helpfulness, suggestions, gestures of goodwill, altruism and other forms of organizational citizenship behavior.
      Substantively, citizenship behaviors are important because they lubricate the social machinery of the organization. They provide the flexibility needed to work through many unforeseen contingencies; they enable participants to cope with the otherwise awesome condition of inter-dependence with each other.
      Recently organizational citizenship behavior has received a great deal of research attention. Despite the growing acceptance of the OCB construct, however, some researchers have raised questions about how OCB is theoretically defined and measured (George & Brief, 1993; Graham, 1988).
      The Purpose of this study is to examine the construct of OCB by reviewing the theoretical and empirical literature. The contents of the study is to review the concept of organizational citizenship behavior, to compare with similar constructs, to investigate the trends of OCB and predictors of OCB.
      번역하기

      To manage the work behavior of employees is essential for creating effective organizations. Work behavior includes several different kinds of employee behavior, and may be classified into in-role behavior and extra-role behavior. It is commonly accept...

      To manage the work behavior of employees is essential for creating effective organizations. Work behavior includes several different kinds of employee behavior, and may be classified into in-role behavior and extra-role behavior. It is commonly accepted in the management literature that organizations need employees who are willing to exceed their formal job requirements. This kind of work behavior goes beyond traditional job performance and is necessary for long-term organizational effectiveness. In the last decade, many terms have been used to describe such behavior including organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Graham, 1991; Organ, 1988, 1990; Schnake, 1991), prosocial organizational behavior (Brief & Motowidlo, 1986; ), extra-role behavior (Van Dyne & Cummings, 1990; Werner, 1994), and organizational spontaneity (George & Brief, 1992).
      Nearly three decades ago, Katz (1964) identified three basic types of behavior essential for a functioning organization: attracting and holding people in the system, dependable role performance; and innovative and spontaneous behavior. Concerning this third category, Katz noted, "An organization which depends solely upon its blueprints of prescribed behavior is a very fragile social system"(p.132).
      Roethlisberger and Dickson (1964) noted that cooperation refers to something other than productivity. Productivity is regarded as a function of the formal organization (the authority structure, role specification, technology) and the "logic of facts". Cooperation, on the other hand, refers to acts that serve more of a maintenance purpose, to "maintain internal equilibrium." Cooperation thus includes day-to-day spontaneous prosocial gestures of individual accommodation to the work needs of others (e.g., co-workers, supervisor, clients in other departments (Smith et al., (1983) p.653). Every factory, office, or bureau depends daily on a myriad of acts of cooperation, helpfulness, suggestions, gestures of goodwill, altruism and other forms of organizational citizenship behavior.
      Substantively, citizenship behaviors are important because they lubricate the social machinery of the organization. They provide the flexibility needed to work through many unforeseen contingencies; they enable participants to cope with the otherwise awesome condition of inter-dependence with each other.
      Recently organizational citizenship behavior has received a great deal of research attention. Despite the growing acceptance of the OCB construct, however, some researchers have raised questions about how OCB is theoretically defined and measured (George & Brief, 1993; Graham, 1988).
      The Purpose of this study is to examine the construct of OCB by reviewing the theoretical and empirical literature. The contents of the study is to review the concept of organizational citizenship behavior, to compare with similar constructs, to investigate the trends of OCB and predictors of OCB.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 자발적 조직행동의 개념연구
      • Ⅲ. 자발적 조직행동연구의 전개과정
      • Ⅳ. 자발적 조직행동의 선행변수에 관한 연구
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 자발적 조직행동의 개념연구
      • Ⅲ. 자발적 조직행동연구의 전개과정
      • Ⅳ. 자발적 조직행동의 선행변수에 관한 연구
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼