RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    자아개념과 자아효능감의 비교 분석 = A Comparative Analysis on Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45009567

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this thesis is to illuminate conceptually the similarities and differences between self-concept and self-efficacy, the self-constructs known to wield critical influence on students' academic attainment and psychological well-being in school.
    The two conceptualizations share important similarities such as their treatment of perceived competence as the most integral element. Both self-beliefs use prior mastery experience, social comparison and reflected appraisals as major informations sources. They are also domain-specific and multidimensional such that students hold perceptions that are unique to each academic domain and reasonably differentiated across diverse areas. These constructs predict subsequent motivation, emotion, and performance to varying degrees.
    There are also important differences. Academic self-concept includes cognitive evaluation of capability along with affective reactions. Self-efficacy makes clear distinction between these components and considers affective reactions as a consequence of self-efficacy perceptions. While competence evaluation in self-concept relies heavily on social comparison and hence tends to be normative, self-efficacy evaluation is primarily goal-referenced and most strongly affected by one's enactive experiences. Academic self-concept reflects an aggregated judgment or overall impression of one's competence in given academic domains. As such, self-concept beliefs tend to be past-oriented, stable over time, and resistant to change.
    Academic self-efficacy demonstrates more consistent operational definitions and more context-specific judgment of one's competence. The dynamic and malleable nature of self-efficacy perceptions renders them more amenable to experimental procedures aiming at efficacy enhancement. These differences contribute to self-efficacy's superior predictive and explanatory utility.
    Which still need considerably more research are How can we change students' self-perceptions to a positive direction? How can we strengthen their self -confidence toward difficult and previously unsuccessful academic tasks? Most importantly, how can we help students form accurate yet optimistic self-perceptions and help them avoid their low academic self-perceptions to negatively affect their self-worth?
    번역하기

    The purpose of this thesis is to illuminate conceptually the similarities and differences between self-concept and self-efficacy, the self-constructs known to wield critical influence on students' academic attainment and psychological well-being in sc...

    The purpose of this thesis is to illuminate conceptually the similarities and differences between self-concept and self-efficacy, the self-constructs known to wield critical influence on students' academic attainment and psychological well-being in school.
    The two conceptualizations share important similarities such as their treatment of perceived competence as the most integral element. Both self-beliefs use prior mastery experience, social comparison and reflected appraisals as major informations sources. They are also domain-specific and multidimensional such that students hold perceptions that are unique to each academic domain and reasonably differentiated across diverse areas. These constructs predict subsequent motivation, emotion, and performance to varying degrees.
    There are also important differences. Academic self-concept includes cognitive evaluation of capability along with affective reactions. Self-efficacy makes clear distinction between these components and considers affective reactions as a consequence of self-efficacy perceptions. While competence evaluation in self-concept relies heavily on social comparison and hence tends to be normative, self-efficacy evaluation is primarily goal-referenced and most strongly affected by one's enactive experiences. Academic self-concept reflects an aggregated judgment or overall impression of one's competence in given academic domains. As such, self-concept beliefs tend to be past-oriented, stable over time, and resistant to change.
    Academic self-efficacy demonstrates more consistent operational definitions and more context-specific judgment of one's competence. The dynamic and malleable nature of self-efficacy perceptions renders them more amenable to experimental procedures aiming at efficacy enhancement. These differences contribute to self-efficacy's superior predictive and explanatory utility.
    Which still need considerably more research are How can we change students' self-perceptions to a positive direction? How can we strengthen their self -confidence toward difficult and previously unsuccessful academic tasks? Most importantly, how can we help students form accurate yet optimistic self-perceptions and help them avoid their low academic self-perceptions to negatively affect their self-worth?

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 개념적 정의의 비교
    • Ⅲ. 조작적 정의의 비교
    • Ⅳ. 준거 영역별 비교
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 개념적 정의의 비교
    • Ⅲ. 조작적 정의의 비교
    • Ⅳ. 준거 영역별 비교
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • <참고문헌>
    • <Abstract>
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼