RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      CVM을 이용한 체험관광의 가치평가

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102008735

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Considering increased interest in experiential tourism, the purpose of this paper is to valuate experiential tourism, using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. For this end, an intercept survey with self-administered questionnaire was conducted for domestic people in major metropolitan cities and provinces. The results of logit model indicated that willingness-to-pay was the most important variable in explaining participating probability of experiential tourism, followed by income and education. The empirical results showed that the economic value of experiential tourism was estimated to be 175,000 won per person based on a truncated willingness-to-pay method. The findings also indicated that the economic value of experiential tourism was substantially greater than its travel cost, implying greater economic benefit to experiential tourists. The results of this study will be used for segmenting experiential tourism market and forecasting the magnitude of experiential tourism in the future.
      번역하기

      Considering increased interest in experiential tourism, the purpose of this paper is to valuate experiential tourism, using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. For this end, an intercept survey with self-administered questionnaire was co...

      Considering increased interest in experiential tourism, the purpose of this paper is to valuate experiential tourism, using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. For this end, an intercept survey with self-administered questionnaire was conducted for domestic people in major metropolitan cities and provinces. The results of logit model indicated that willingness-to-pay was the most important variable in explaining participating probability of experiential tourism, followed by income and education. The empirical results showed that the economic value of experiential tourism was estimated to be 175,000 won per person based on a truncated willingness-to-pay method. The findings also indicated that the economic value of experiential tourism was substantially greater than its travel cost, implying greater economic benefit to experiential tourists. The results of this study will be used for segmenting experiential tourism market and forecasting the magnitude of experiential tourism in the future.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "체험관광 상품개발 활성화방안 ." 한국관광연구원. 1999

      2 "이선선택형 가상가치평가에서의 가설적 가치와 실제가치." 46 (46): 309-322, 1999

      3 "신관광자원론" 일신사 1994

      4 "산림의 공익적 기능의 계량화 연구" 과학기술처 1991

      5 "동굴자원의 체험관광 활성화 방안 ." 2002

      6 "The Value of Clean Water The Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable" 2445-2454, 1993

      7 "Proposed Rules for Valuing Environmental Demages" NOAA 59 : 1061-1191, 1994

      8 "Estimating the Use and Preservation Values of National Parks' Tourism Resources Using a Contingent Valuation Method" 23 (23): 531-540, 2002

      9 "Contingent Valuation의 세가지 기법을 이용한 산림휴양가치 평가에 관한 연구: 팔공산 자연공원의 사례," 1995

      10 "A Comparison of Techniques. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70" 20-28, 1988

      1 "체험관광 상품개발 활성화방안 ." 한국관광연구원. 1999

      2 "이선선택형 가상가치평가에서의 가설적 가치와 실제가치." 46 (46): 309-322, 1999

      3 "신관광자원론" 일신사 1994

      4 "산림의 공익적 기능의 계량화 연구" 과학기술처 1991

      5 "동굴자원의 체험관광 활성화 방안 ." 2002

      6 "The Value of Clean Water The Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable" 2445-2454, 1993

      7 "Proposed Rules for Valuing Environmental Demages" NOAA 59 : 1061-1191, 1994

      8 "Estimating the Use and Preservation Values of National Parks' Tourism Resources Using a Contingent Valuation Method" 23 (23): 531-540, 2002

      9 "Contingent Valuation의 세가지 기법을 이용한 산림휴양가치 평가에 관한 연구: 팔공산 자연공원의 사례," 1995

      10 "A Comparison of Techniques. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70" 20-28, 1988

      11 ". 생태관광자원의 레크레이션 이용가치 측정." 21 (21): 263-278, 1998

      12 ". Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71" 1057-1061, 1989

      13 ". Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses" (3) : 332-341, 1984

      14 ". Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71" 1054-1055, 1989

      15 ". Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation" (4) : 19-43, 1994

      16 ". Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques. Land Economics 61" 158-175, 1985

      17 ". Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change" 94-98, 1988

      18 ". Using Surveys to Value Public Goods Resources for the Future." 1989

      19 ". Use of Dichotomous Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resources. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70" 372-381, 1988

      20 ". The Value of Big Game Hunting in a Private Forest. In Transaction of the 29th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference." 1964

      21 ". The Structure of Contingent Markets Some Results of a Recent Experiment paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Economics Association." 1981

      22 ". The Net Economic Value of Day Use Cross Country Skiing in Vermont A Dichotomize Choice Contingent Valuation Approach. Journal of Leisure Research 22" 341-352, 1990

      23 ". The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Value Resources for the Future." 1993

      24 ". Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvement A Contingent Valuation Study for Monongahela River Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14" 248-267, 1987

      25 ". Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods Are Indirect Measures Biased?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61" 926-930, 1979

      26 ". Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation" 225-239, 1991

      27 ". Economics of Outdoor Recreation" the Johns Hopkins University. 1966

      28 ". Contingent Valuation Using Dichotomous Choice Models" (1) : 46-56, 1988

      29 ". Bidding Games for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1" 132-149, 1974

      30 ". An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements" 1981

      31 ". A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75" 593-603, 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research -> International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-12-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-03-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 관광연구저널
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.95 1.95 1.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.82 1.8 2.18 0.68
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼