교육은 교사와 학생이 상호작용하여 완성해나가는 과정이라는 점을 고려할 때, 학생들의 자발적참여는 학생학습의 성공여부를 결정짓는 중요한 요소이다. 이에본 연구에서는 학생의 효과...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107885155
2004
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
91-108(18쪽)
27
0
상세조회0
다운로드교육은 교사와 학생이 상호작용하여 완성해나가는 과정이라는 점을 고려할 때, 학생들의 자발적참여는 학생학습의 성공여부를 결정짓는 중요한 요소이다. 이에본 연구에서는 학생의 효과...
교육은 교사와 학생이 상호작용하여 완성해나가는 과정이라는 점을 고려할 때, 학생들의 자발적참여는 학생학습의 성공여부를 결정짓는 중요한 요소이다. 이에본 연구에서는 학생의 효과적인 학습을 완성짓는 결정적 요인인 학생의 자발적참여를 향상시킬 수 있는 학생변인과 교사변인을 위계적선형모형을 사용하여 밝혀내었다. 연구 결과 학생수준에서는 여학생이 남학생보다, 보다 높은 사회경제적 지위를 가진 학생이 그렇지 않은 학생보다, 성적우수 학생이 그렇지않은 학생보다 자발적참여도가 높았다. 교사수준에서는 진정한수업과 수업내용의 난이도가 자발적참여도와 참여도 격차에 의미있는 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Engagement has been regarded as a strong predictor of student dropout rate and achievement, and enhancing student engagement has been a challenge to educators over the past decade. The study explores how student engagement can be improved. Since teach...
Engagement has been regarded as a strong predictor of student dropout rate and achievement, and enhancing student engagement has been a challenge to educators over the past decade. The study explores how student engagement can be improved. Since teachers are the most influential beings to students, this research focuses teacher variables. The research question is "what student and teacher variables separately and interactively affect student engagement?"<br/>
Since students were nested within a classroom, Hierarchical Linear Modeling(HLM) was used for this analysis. The results show that girls, high SES students, and higher achievers are significantly more engaged in academic activities. Black students are less engaged in school work than White students, while Asian and Hispanic students tend to be more engaged than White. Among teacher-level variables, a teacher's authentic instruction makes positive differences in student engagement. In other words, authentic instruction not only improves student engagement but also reduces the student engagement gap between higher and lower achievers. High content coverage widens the student engagement between higher and lower achievers, but it closes the student engagement gap between girls and boys.<br/>
These findings suggest that a teacher's instruction makes differences in student engagement. For a further study, research on student engagement needs to include upper-level variables such as teachers, parents, and schools if significant teacher effects at the upper-level are considered.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "Withdrawing from school" 59 (59): 117-142, 1989
2 Hanushek,E.A, "The trade-off between child quantity and quality" 100 : 84-117, 1992
3 "The significance and sources of student engagement Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools" Teachers College Press 19921992
4 Hill, P. W, "The role of standards in educational reform for the 21st century,ASCD 1999 Yearbook: Preparing our Schools for the 21st Century." Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. crea : 1999
5 "The origins of alienation" 231 : 53-61, 1974
6 "The effects of stratification in secondary schools Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research Review of Educational Research" 1987195-211
7 "The Impact of School Resources on the Learning of Inner City Children" Ballinger 1975
8 "The High School as Community Contextual Influences and Consequences for Students and Teachers National Center on Effective Secondary Schools University of Wisconsin-Madison" 1988
9 "The Effects of Race and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science" 1990
10 "Teaching worth celebrating." 56 (56): 8-13, 1999
1 "Withdrawing from school" 59 (59): 117-142, 1989
2 Hanushek,E.A, "The trade-off between child quantity and quality" 100 : 84-117, 1992
3 "The significance and sources of student engagement Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools" Teachers College Press 19921992
4 Hill, P. W, "The role of standards in educational reform for the 21st century,ASCD 1999 Yearbook: Preparing our Schools for the 21st Century." Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. crea : 1999
5 "The origins of alienation" 231 : 53-61, 1974
6 "The effects of stratification in secondary schools Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research Review of Educational Research" 1987195-211
7 "The Impact of School Resources on the Learning of Inner City Children" Ballinger 1975
8 "The High School as Community Contextual Influences and Consequences for Students and Teachers National Center on Effective Secondary Schools University of Wisconsin-Madison" 1988
9 "The Effects of Race and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science" 1990
10 "Teaching worth celebrating." 56 (56): 8-13, 1999
11 "Teacher quality and student achievement: Recommendations for Principals." National Association of Secondary School Principals. 628 (628): 64-73, 2001
12 Finn, "Students at Risk National Center for Educational Statistics Research and Development Reports" 1993
13 "Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years." 37 (37): 153-184, 2000
14 "Student characteristics mediating engagement-outcome relationships in physical education" 56 (56): 66-72, 1985
15 "Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools" Teachers College Press 1992
16 "Small classes in American schools: Research, practice, and politics." 83 (83): 551-560, 2002
17 "Revisiting effective teaching" 56 (56): 61-64, 1998
18 "Rethinking gender differences in literacy." 24 (24): 1-16, 1999
19 "Research in the Teaching of English" 261-290, 1991
20 "Race and the schooling of black Americans" 68-78, 1992
21 "Powerful Learning" Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1998
22 "Paying for public education:New evidence on how and why money matters" 28 : 465-498, 1991
23 "Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils" 141-62, 1992
24 "National Center on Effective Secondary Schools" 1989
25 "Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling." SAGE. 1999
26 "Measuring the teacher quality problem,Better Teachers, Better Schools(pp.19-30)" 1999
27 "Introducing Multilevel Modeling." SAGE. 1998
28 Haycock, K., "Good teaching matters…a lot" 3 (3): 3-14, 1998
29 "Giving Voice and Empowerment to Student Engagement Paper presented at the National Conference on School Restructuring" 1991
30 "Florida Journal of Educational Research" 25-40, 1986
31 "Enhancing engagement in early language teaching" 23 (23): 48-50, 1991
32 "Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students" 66 : 164-87, 1993
33 "Effects of school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement." 68 (68): 241-70, 1995
34 "Effective teachers of inner city children" Princeton 1978
35 "Educating teachers for the next century: Rethinking practice and policy. In G.A. Griffin(Ed.) The Education of Teachers: Ninety-eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education." University of Chicago Press. 1999
36 "Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement." 22 (22): 129-145, 2000
37 "Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement." University of Tennessee, Tennessee Value Added Assessment System. k : 1996
38 "Analyzing longitudinal rating data: A three-level hierarchical linear model." 23 : 258-268, 1999
39 "Academic Success among Poor and Minority Students." Johns Hopkins University 2001
40 "A place Called School:Prospects for the Future" McGraw-Hill 1984
41 ".Teacher Certification Reconsidered:Stumbling for Quality" 2001
교육경쟁력 강화를 위한 사학운영체제 개선방안: 자율학교 및 자립형 사립고등학교
미국과의 비교 연구를 통한 우리나라 교직과목 「교육행정」의 특성 고찰
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 1.78 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.92 | 2.06 | 1.843 | 0.17 |