RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      듀이의 문제해결과 비판적 사고의 관계 = The analysis of the interrelationship between critical thinking and reflective problem- solving: Deweyan`s approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75399026

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the interrelationship between Dewey`s reflective problem-solving and critical thinking The conclusions are as follows Above all, even though Dewey believed the generalizability of critical thinking, It`s not logically natural to take It as a method of teaching. In Dewey`s view, the notion of methods isolated from subject-matter is responsible for the false conceptions of discipline and interest. Secondly, the it`s useless to tell the relationships of inclusion between problem-solving and critical thinking in that, as usual, researchers on this issue are inclined to analyze them by their own perspectives. So, in tins research, after examining both conceptions through the medium of reflectivenes, the conclusion is that they are co-extensive in their usages. Thirdly, Ennis urged that Dewey`s view on thinking is totally subjective, psychological one in that the inquirer believes what he wants to believe. But the characteristics of Dewey`s reflective inquiry are far tram in Dewey claimed that one should acquire the ability to supplement the narrowness of his experience by utilizing the experiences of others It means what Ennis called `Dewey`s subjectivism` could be considered as much the same objective efforts as Ennis does in the practical thinking process In conclusion, granted that Dewey was not a servant of subjectivism and the general principles on critical thinking could be changable according to the contexts, the infusion model of education might be successfully adopted as one of the dominant approaches in teaching thinking
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the interrelationship between Dewey`s reflective problem-solving and critical thinking The conclusions are as follows Above all, even though Dewey believed the generalizability of critical thinking, It`s not log...

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the interrelationship between Dewey`s reflective problem-solving and critical thinking The conclusions are as follows Above all, even though Dewey believed the generalizability of critical thinking, It`s not logically natural to take It as a method of teaching. In Dewey`s view, the notion of methods isolated from subject-matter is responsible for the false conceptions of discipline and interest. Secondly, the it`s useless to tell the relationships of inclusion between problem-solving and critical thinking in that, as usual, researchers on this issue are inclined to analyze them by their own perspectives. So, in tins research, after examining both conceptions through the medium of reflectivenes, the conclusion is that they are co-extensive in their usages. Thirdly, Ennis urged that Dewey`s view on thinking is totally subjective, psychological one in that the inquirer believes what he wants to believe. But the characteristics of Dewey`s reflective inquiry are far tram in Dewey claimed that one should acquire the ability to supplement the narrowness of his experience by utilizing the experiences of others It means what Ennis called `Dewey`s subjectivism` could be considered as much the same objective efforts as Ennis does in the practical thinking process In conclusion, granted that Dewey was not a servant of subjectivism and the general principles on critical thinking could be changable according to the contexts, the infusion model of education might be successfully adopted as one of the dominant approaches in teaching thinking

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 McPeck, "비판적 사고와 교육" 1989

      2 정호표, "교육의 역사 및 철학적 기초" 형설출판사 1987

      3 이돈희, "“한국교육의 실상과 개혁의 방향”" 1-17, 1998

      4 최석민, "“통합적 사고 교육을 위한 토대로서 사고간 유기적 관련성 탐색 사고의 비판성과 창의성을 중심으로”" 한국초등교육학회 16 (16): 109-129, 2003

      5 조연순, "“창의적 비판적 사고력과 교육 지식의 융합을 위한 교수-학습 모형으로서의 문제중심학습" 한국초등교육학회 14 (14): 295-316, 2001

      6 김경자, "“창의적 문제 해결력 신장을 위한 교육과정 평가 모형”" 한국초등교육학회 13 (13): 135-152, 2000

      7 박선환, "“비판적 사고 교육의 현황과 방향 모색” 사회ㆍ교육과학연구" 3 : 77-95, 1999

      8 이진향, "“교사의 수업개선을 위한 반성적 사고의 의미 고찰” 한국교원교육연구" 한국교원교육학회 19 (19): 1-21, 2002

      9 김천기, "“공교육 문제와 그 대안에 대한 서구교육이론의 한국적 타당성”" 한국교육사회학회 13 (13): 77-107, 2003

      10 Chambers, "“Teaching Thinking Through the Curriculum -Where Else?" 3-12, 1988

      1 McPeck, "비판적 사고와 교육" 1989

      2 정호표, "교육의 역사 및 철학적 기초" 형설출판사 1987

      3 이돈희, "“한국교육의 실상과 개혁의 방향”" 1-17, 1998

      4 최석민, "“통합적 사고 교육을 위한 토대로서 사고간 유기적 관련성 탐색 사고의 비판성과 창의성을 중심으로”" 한국초등교육학회 16 (16): 109-129, 2003

      5 조연순, "“창의적 비판적 사고력과 교육 지식의 융합을 위한 교수-학습 모형으로서의 문제중심학습" 한국초등교육학회 14 (14): 295-316, 2001

      6 김경자, "“창의적 문제 해결력 신장을 위한 교육과정 평가 모형”" 한국초등교육학회 13 (13): 135-152, 2000

      7 박선환, "“비판적 사고 교육의 현황과 방향 모색” 사회ㆍ교육과학연구" 3 : 77-95, 1999

      8 이진향, "“교사의 수업개선을 위한 반성적 사고의 의미 고찰” 한국교원교육연구" 한국교원교육학회 19 (19): 1-21, 2002

      9 김천기, "“공교육 문제와 그 대안에 대한 서구교육이론의 한국적 타당성”" 한국교육사회학회 13 (13): 77-107, 2003

      10 Chambers, "“Teaching Thinking Through the Curriculum -Where Else?" 3-12, 1988

      11 조용기, "“A Different Stroke of Creativity 초등교육연구논총" 303-317, 1987

      12 Thayer-Bacon, "Transforming Critical Thinking" Columbia University 2000

      13 No, "The Extent to which Critical Thinking is Subject Specific" 13-16, 1990

      14 Paul, "Teaching Critical Thinking in the Strong Sense In by Arthur L A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking" 1991

      15 Sternberg, "Questions and Answers about the Nature and Teaching of Thinking Skills" Freeman and Company 1985

      16 "Philosophy of Education Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society" 76-80, 1993

      17 Streib, "History and Analysis of Critical Thinking" Memphis State University 1992

      18 Hedges, "Helping Student Develop Thinking Skills Through The Problem-Solving Appreach to Teaching" The Ohio State University 1991

      19 Capossela, "Designing Writing Assignments to Foster Critical Thinking" 1993

      20 ________, "Democracy and Education" The Free Press 1916

      21 Baron, "Critical Thought Essential to the Acquisition of Rational Knowledge and Passions" Freeman and Company 1987

      22 Smith, "Critical Thinking Activities for Nursing" Lippincott 1999

      23 "Critical Thinking" Prentice-Hall Inc 1996

      24 Perkins, "An Integrative Perspective on Teaching Cognitive Skills" Freeman and Company 1988

      25 "A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills" 44-48, 1985

      26 The Foreword View, "A Free Teacher in a Free Society" Appleton-Century Company 330-345, 1937

      27 Garrison, "A Conceptual Model for Developing Critical Thinking in Adult Learners International Journal of Life Long Education" 287-303, 1991

      28 Ennis, "A Concept of Critical Thinking" 81-111, 1962

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼