RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소비자-브랜드 관계 유형에 따른 브랜드 자산 구성 요소들 간의 상호작용에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76396684

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Consumer-brand relationship is formed through the total process that consumers are aware of, buy, use and experience a brand as the interaction between a consumer's attitude toward the brand and a brand's attitude toward the consumer. The process by which the consumer-brand relationship is formed influences the components of brand equity: brand awareness, perceived quality, brand image, brand attitude. and brand loyalty.
      The goal of this study is two-folds. One is to derive general types of consumer-brand relationship consumers perceive. The other is to identify the causal relationship among components of brand equity.
      Four different types of consumer-brand relationship in mobile phone products were obtained in Korea by conducting factor analysis and cluster analysis. These types of relationships are significantly different.
      Some theoretical implications are discussed. First, some types of consumer-brand relationship can be materialized. Second, these types of relationship can be identified in detail in the process of making profile analysis. Third, the causal relationship model among components of brand equity is divided into three levels: formative, intermediary, and performing factors. Fourth, some sources of marketing strategy can be obtained effectively using the causal relationship model to build brand equity. Finally, it is shown that influences among components of brand equity should be different by the type of consumer-brand relationship. Also, some managerial implications for mobile phone industry are briefly discussed.
      번역하기

      Consumer-brand relationship is formed through the total process that consumers are aware of, buy, use and experience a brand as the interaction between a consumer's attitude toward the brand and a brand's attitude toward the consumer. The process by w...

      Consumer-brand relationship is formed through the total process that consumers are aware of, buy, use and experience a brand as the interaction between a consumer's attitude toward the brand and a brand's attitude toward the consumer. The process by which the consumer-brand relationship is formed influences the components of brand equity: brand awareness, perceived quality, brand image, brand attitude. and brand loyalty.
      The goal of this study is two-folds. One is to derive general types of consumer-brand relationship consumers perceive. The other is to identify the causal relationship among components of brand equity.
      Four different types of consumer-brand relationship in mobile phone products were obtained in Korea by conducting factor analysis and cluster analysis. These types of relationships are significantly different.
      Some theoretical implications are discussed. First, some types of consumer-brand relationship can be materialized. Second, these types of relationship can be identified in detail in the process of making profile analysis. Third, the causal relationship model among components of brand equity is divided into three levels: formative, intermediary, and performing factors. Fourth, some sources of marketing strategy can be obtained effectively using the causal relationship model to build brand equity. Finally, it is shown that influences among components of brand equity should be different by the type of consumer-brand relationship. Also, some managerial implications for mobile phone industry are briefly discussed.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.35 1.35 1.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.33 1.34 1.388 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼