RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    19세기 한국의 국제법 수용과 중국과의 전통적 관계 청산을 위한 투쟁

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102592542

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Korean king used the signing of the 1876 Treaty of Amity between Chosen and Japan to begin adopting the western system of international law. The conclusion of treaties of amity and commerce with the U.S., England, and Germany in 1882 showed a strong desire to enter into this new system, so much so that concluding treaties with the Western powers presented few worries for Korea. Because the Chosun government actively pursued the necessary preparations for signing these treaties, the benefits of tariff autonomy were, in fact, achieved through these diplomatic arrangements. These circumstances differ from those of Meiji Japan, which was forced to endure unequal tariff regulations in the wake of the sudden shock of the 'black ships" and a divided public opinion. The task faced by Chosun Korea was not in its relations with the West but in re-arranging its traditional relations with China.
    By the time of the conclusion of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the U.S., the Chosun monarch and his court had already been its search for a strategy to solve this problem. They quickly sent an official to negotiate with the Chinese to put an end to the long-standing system in which an envoy shuttled back and forth between Chosun and China, and wisely suggested to carry out a plan to establish a system of permanent diplomatic residence. However, Ching China showed no willingness to modify its traditional relations with Chosun, in spite of the fact that it went as far as to suggest that Chosun establish friendly relations with the U.S. Hence, China naturally displayed a negative attitude towards the proposal presented by the Koreans. In fact, the Chinese court considered this proposal as a Korean attempt to break away from its sphere of influence, and produced the opposite effect of strengthening China's suzerain relations with Chosun, "This policy was most detrimental to Korea's modernization, and hence the struggle by the Chosun government against it was more demanding than Japan's efforts to revise its unequal treaties with the Western powers. In order to overcome the stronger than expected resistance on the part of the Chinese, the Chosun government attempted a number of negotiations with the Russians. Nevertheless, all of the secret contacts with Russia ended in failure, and at each failed attempt, the Chinese put more pressure on Chosun. Although the decade of the 1880s was the most important for Korea to carry out its modernization projects, it was forced to waste that valuable time, burdened by China's strong opposition to its attempts at participating in the new international system.
    번역하기

    The Korean king used the signing of the 1876 Treaty of Amity between Chosen and Japan to begin adopting the western system of international law. The conclusion of treaties of amity and commerce with the U.S., England, and Germany in 1882 showed a stro...

    The Korean king used the signing of the 1876 Treaty of Amity between Chosen and Japan to begin adopting the western system of international law. The conclusion of treaties of amity and commerce with the U.S., England, and Germany in 1882 showed a strong desire to enter into this new system, so much so that concluding treaties with the Western powers presented few worries for Korea. Because the Chosun government actively pursued the necessary preparations for signing these treaties, the benefits of tariff autonomy were, in fact, achieved through these diplomatic arrangements. These circumstances differ from those of Meiji Japan, which was forced to endure unequal tariff regulations in the wake of the sudden shock of the 'black ships" and a divided public opinion. The task faced by Chosun Korea was not in its relations with the West but in re-arranging its traditional relations with China.
    By the time of the conclusion of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce with the U.S., the Chosun monarch and his court had already been its search for a strategy to solve this problem. They quickly sent an official to negotiate with the Chinese to put an end to the long-standing system in which an envoy shuttled back and forth between Chosun and China, and wisely suggested to carry out a plan to establish a system of permanent diplomatic residence. However, Ching China showed no willingness to modify its traditional relations with Chosun, in spite of the fact that it went as far as to suggest that Chosun establish friendly relations with the U.S. Hence, China naturally displayed a negative attitude towards the proposal presented by the Koreans. In fact, the Chinese court considered this proposal as a Korean attempt to break away from its sphere of influence, and produced the opposite effect of strengthening China's suzerain relations with Chosun, "This policy was most detrimental to Korea's modernization, and hence the struggle by the Chosun government against it was more demanding than Japan's efforts to revise its unequal treaties with the Western powers. In order to overcome the stronger than expected resistance on the part of the Chinese, the Chosun government attempted a number of negotiations with the Russians. Nevertheless, all of the secret contacts with Russia ended in failure, and at each failed attempt, the Chinese put more pressure on Chosun. Although the decade of the 1880s was the most important for Korea to carry out its modernization projects, it was forced to waste that valuable time, burdened by China's strong opposition to its attempts at participating in the new international system.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 일본ㆍ미국과의 조약 체결과 중국과의 전통적 관계 청산 시도
    • Ⅲ. 淸의 반발과 속방화 정책의 강행
    • Ⅳ. 러시아와의 교섭을 통한 극복 모색
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 일본ㆍ미국과의 조약 체결과 중국과의 전통적 관계 청산 시도
    • Ⅲ. 淸의 반발과 속방화 정책의 강행
    • Ⅳ. 러시아와의 교섭을 통한 극복 모색
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼