RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국철학 : 조선말 성리학자의 성리학적 개념에 대한 인식 -송래희의 『성리논변』1,2권을 중심으로- = Korean Philosophy : Neo-confucianists` cognition of Neo-Confucian terms in later Chosun

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40124388

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Confucianism of the last period of Chosun was progressed towards two trends. One is disputes about the concepts of confucianism according to factional view point. The other is the tendency of practical science(實學) to search realistic solusion overcoming social conflict and political confusion. But despite of long-year dispute the concepts of confucianism were not defined. Despite of establishing theory of Bon-Che(本體論) based on the theory of Li-Ki(理氣論) problems still exist about how we could explain Bul-Sang-Ri(不相離) Bul-Sang-Jab(不相雜), and which the first is between Li(理) and Ki(氣). Theory of In-Seong(人性論) is based on the theory of Seong-Jeong(性情論), but the concept of Seong(性) is divided into Bon-Yeon-Chi-Seong(本然之性) and Ki-Jil-Chi-Seong(氣質之性), according to this a question arises whether the concept of Seong(性) is limited to humanbeing or reached to object. I think that it is necessary to clarify the authority of concepts and adjust them in order to solve these problems. They are what Seong(性) is in the theory of In-Mul-Seong Dong-I(人物性同異論), and whether Seong(性) and Li(理)have mutuality in the theory of Seong-Chuk-Li(性卽理). Seong-Li-Non-Byun(性理論辨) is a very useful work published by Lai-Hui Song(宋來熙) in the last period of Chosun. Lai-Hui Song intended to present the foundation of concepts, and to adjust concepts of confucianism of Chosun by compiling diverse articles and studies. Therefore the study on Seong-Li-Non-Byun(性理論辨) is useful to reform confusion between concepts on the theory of Sa-Dan Chil-Jeong(四端七情論) and the theory of In-Mul-Seong Dong-I(人物性同異論).
    번역하기

    Confucianism of the last period of Chosun was progressed towards two trends. One is disputes about the concepts of confucianism according to factional view point. The other is the tendency of practical science(實學) to search realistic solusion over...

    Confucianism of the last period of Chosun was progressed towards two trends. One is disputes about the concepts of confucianism according to factional view point. The other is the tendency of practical science(實學) to search realistic solusion overcoming social conflict and political confusion. But despite of long-year dispute the concepts of confucianism were not defined. Despite of establishing theory of Bon-Che(本體論) based on the theory of Li-Ki(理氣論) problems still exist about how we could explain Bul-Sang-Ri(不相離) Bul-Sang-Jab(不相雜), and which the first is between Li(理) and Ki(氣). Theory of In-Seong(人性論) is based on the theory of Seong-Jeong(性情論), but the concept of Seong(性) is divided into Bon-Yeon-Chi-Seong(本然之性) and Ki-Jil-Chi-Seong(氣質之性), according to this a question arises whether the concept of Seong(性) is limited to humanbeing or reached to object. I think that it is necessary to clarify the authority of concepts and adjust them in order to solve these problems. They are what Seong(性) is in the theory of In-Mul-Seong Dong-I(人物性同異論), and whether Seong(性) and Li(理)have mutuality in the theory of Seong-Chuk-Li(性卽理). Seong-Li-Non-Byun(性理論辨) is a very useful work published by Lai-Hui Song(宋來熙) in the last period of Chosun. Lai-Hui Song intended to present the foundation of concepts, and to adjust concepts of confucianism of Chosun by compiling diverse articles and studies. Therefore the study on Seong-Li-Non-Byun(性理論辨) is useful to reform confusion between concepts on the theory of Sa-Dan Chil-Jeong(四端七情論) and the theory of In-Mul-Seong Dong-I(人物性同異論).

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 동양철학연구(Journal of Eastern Philosophy) -> 동양철학연구
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Eastern Philosophy
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.54 0.54 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.55 0.54 1.394 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼