RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국인의 신뢰 수준 및 영향 요인 -단체참여 및 개인의 사회,경제적 배경과 대인신뢰, 단체신뢰, 대중매체 신뢰- = The Levels and Determinants of the Koreans` Trust: Interpersonal, Associational, and Mass Media Trust affected by Association Participation, and Socio-Economic Status

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40119447

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the trust levels of Korean people, and clarifies the factors to affect the Korean people`s trust. For the purpose of this study, how the factors including horizontal association participation, hierarchical association participation and individuals` socio-economic status affect Korean people`s trust is analyzed. More than 7,000 surveys are used for data in 14 provinces in Korea. The major findings of this study as followings : First, the degree of Korean people`s trust has distinct difference according to the relationship with them and the subjects of the trust. Korean people show high levels of trust for their family members, friends and colleagues who they know already, while they hardly trust the general people. They show comparatively high levels of trust for civil association and mass media, while they show comparatively low levels of trust for public institutions. Second, hierarchical social association participation as well as the horizontal participation positively affect personal, associational, and meas medial trust. Third, according to the individuals` socio-economic status, the levels of trust shows strikingly contrast. Some variables of individuals` socio-economic status positively affect some kinds of trust, and others negatively affect other kinds of trust. This means that Korean peoples` trust is formed mainly by the gemeinschaft, not by the gesellschaft yet. Overall, this paper discusses how to improve various kinds of trust and suggests research implications for further research.
    번역하기

    This study examines the trust levels of Korean people, and clarifies the factors to affect the Korean people`s trust. For the purpose of this study, how the factors including horizontal association participation, hierarchical association participation...

    This study examines the trust levels of Korean people, and clarifies the factors to affect the Korean people`s trust. For the purpose of this study, how the factors including horizontal association participation, hierarchical association participation and individuals` socio-economic status affect Korean people`s trust is analyzed. More than 7,000 surveys are used for data in 14 provinces in Korea. The major findings of this study as followings : First, the degree of Korean people`s trust has distinct difference according to the relationship with them and the subjects of the trust. Korean people show high levels of trust for their family members, friends and colleagues who they know already, while they hardly trust the general people. They show comparatively high levels of trust for civil association and mass media, while they show comparatively low levels of trust for public institutions. Second, hierarchical social association participation as well as the horizontal participation positively affect personal, associational, and meas medial trust. Third, according to the individuals` socio-economic status, the levels of trust shows strikingly contrast. Some variables of individuals` socio-economic status positively affect some kinds of trust, and others negatively affect other kinds of trust. This means that Korean peoples` trust is formed mainly by the gemeinschaft, not by the gesellschaft yet. Overall, this paper discusses how to improve various kinds of trust and suggests research implications for further research.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼