RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    자치단체간 협력사업의 유형별 성공,실패요인 분석과 추진방안 = An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Success or Failure of Cooperative Projects among Local Governments

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40118688

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is designed to identify a variety of policy alternatives that are most suitable for intergovernmental cooperative projects, which have been classified on a category basis. Intergovernmental cooperative projects are initially classified into nine categories based upon their respective characteristics and features. An empirical analysis based on surveys of 244 local officials in charge of intergovernmental relationships is then performed to determine the factors affecting the success or failure of cooperative projects in the course of their implementation. It is found that financial factors are the most crucial elements in determining the success of intergovernmental cooperative projects while the attitude of local CEOs toward cooperation is next in importance. This suggests that intergovernmental cooperative projects, including those involving physical facilities and infrastructure construction, would be actively pursued when provided with financial resources through the establishment of local government unions or agreements. With respect to projects associated with software development of events, the attitudes and values of CEOs`, along with information and knowledge exchange programs, were found to shape their success. In cooperative projects there conflicting interests exist among stakeholders, ample financial resources should be provided, and the intervention of a higher jurisdictional authority may be needed.
    번역하기

    This study is designed to identify a variety of policy alternatives that are most suitable for intergovernmental cooperative projects, which have been classified on a category basis. Intergovernmental cooperative projects are initially classified into...

    This study is designed to identify a variety of policy alternatives that are most suitable for intergovernmental cooperative projects, which have been classified on a category basis. Intergovernmental cooperative projects are initially classified into nine categories based upon their respective characteristics and features. An empirical analysis based on surveys of 244 local officials in charge of intergovernmental relationships is then performed to determine the factors affecting the success or failure of cooperative projects in the course of their implementation. It is found that financial factors are the most crucial elements in determining the success of intergovernmental cooperative projects while the attitude of local CEOs toward cooperation is next in importance. This suggests that intergovernmental cooperative projects, including those involving physical facilities and infrastructure construction, would be actively pursued when provided with financial resources through the establishment of local government unions or agreements. With respect to projects associated with software development of events, the attitudes and values of CEOs`, along with information and knowledge exchange programs, were found to shape their success. In cooperative projects there conflicting interests exist among stakeholders, ample financial resources should be provided, and the intervention of a higher jurisdictional authority may be needed.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.82 1.82 1.97
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.98 2.13 2.164 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼