This study is verifying between the relationship of rights, analyzing legal structure for the organization of the curriculum, and it suggests the necessity for the improvement of legal system to get the guarantee of self-regulation in the organization...
This study is verifying between the relationship of rights, analyzing legal structure for the organization of the curriculum, and it suggests the necessity for the improvement of legal system to get the guarantee of self-regulation in the organization of the Curriculum. The things that were discussed are followings. First of all, it observes the relationship between the meaning of the curriculum and the rights for the organization. In pedagogy, the definition of curriculum is showed diversely according to the viewpoint it has. But it is not applied in law. Curriculum is stipulated in elementary, secondary educational law, article 23. The role for curriculum is differently stipulated by the levels such as national, local, school level in it, Therefore, in law, it is reasonable for it to be used for the organization of the curriculum. Second, it suggests an opinion for the organization of the curriculum. It suggests opposing opinions between theoretical ground for the organization and the right of the government for the curricula organization. In spite of the opposing opinions, it has in common that the nation has right for the establishment of the guidelines for the curricula organization. Also it analyzes operative law to observe concrete relationship of rights. As a result, nation and local have certain rights for the establishment of the guidelines for the curricula organization, but schools have immediate right for the organization of the curriculum. Finally, it discussed limits related the organization of the curriculum. Frist, It discusses what the guidelines are for the curricula organization; they are organization and implementation. Second, the category of establishment of standard for curriculum; at this moment, there`s no stipulation for it except subjects, so the nation has given carte blanch. Therefore self-regulation is pretty restricted to the organization of the curriculum. Third, range about the organization of the curriculum; it verified the rights for the organization of the curriculum has closer relationship that how much the nation can control the rights. It finds that the rights of the nation is one-sidedly extended, verifying the relationships of the rights for the organization of the curriculum. It suggests that there be matters of legal system related with the organization of the curriculum.