RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    과학 대화를 이용하는 수업에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 및 대화 능력의 변화,발전에 대한 사례 연구 = A Case Study of the Difficulties of Teacher and Students in Using the Science Talk, and the Change and Improvement of Their Ability of Talking about Science

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40106338

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of the science talk in a second grade science classroom in U. S. This case study examined a prospective elementary teacher`s attitude to the science instruction during her preparation for science lead teaching based on the use of the science talk. This study also described the teacher`s and students` difficulties as well as the developmental process appeared in their strenuous efforts of employing the science talk to their science classroom. For this study a prospective elementary teacher was selected while she was doing her internship in the 5th year of her teacher education program at Michigan State University and was teaching 17 lessons of the food for the plants unit for an elementary science classroom of 18 second graders. The multiple sources of data included researchers` participatory field notes and video/audio-recordings acquired from her classroom teaching and students` classroom activities during 8 weeks. The interview data were gathered, and all of the audio-taped interview data were fully transcribed. Analysis of the data showed that in the beginning of the adoption of the science talk, both teacher and students showed difficulties in managing and developing the effective science talk. At the beginning, the teacher revealed the inefficient management skills of the science talk. As a result, the students did not make a good scientific discussion and argument! not providing their own scientific evidence. As the science classes were moved on, however, both teacher and students were able to make significant progress on their scientific discussion and discourses through their strenuous efforts to use on-going science talks. Finally, the students showed not only the ability to deeply think about and discuss the particular science topics, but also the overall improvement of communicating sharing, and discussing of their science ideas based on scientific evidence and reasoning.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of the science talk in a second grade science classroom in U. S. This case study examined a prospective elementary teacher`s attitude to the science instruction during her preparation for science lea...

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of the science talk in a second grade science classroom in U. S. This case study examined a prospective elementary teacher`s attitude to the science instruction during her preparation for science lead teaching based on the use of the science talk. This study also described the teacher`s and students` difficulties as well as the developmental process appeared in their strenuous efforts of employing the science talk to their science classroom. For this study a prospective elementary teacher was selected while she was doing her internship in the 5th year of her teacher education program at Michigan State University and was teaching 17 lessons of the food for the plants unit for an elementary science classroom of 18 second graders. The multiple sources of data included researchers` participatory field notes and video/audio-recordings acquired from her classroom teaching and students` classroom activities during 8 weeks. The interview data were gathered, and all of the audio-taped interview data were fully transcribed. Analysis of the data showed that in the beginning of the adoption of the science talk, both teacher and students showed difficulties in managing and developing the effective science talk. At the beginning, the teacher revealed the inefficient management skills of the science talk. As a result, the students did not make a good scientific discussion and argument! not providing their own scientific evidence. As the science classes were moved on, however, both teacher and students were able to make significant progress on their scientific discussion and discourses through their strenuous efforts to use on-going science talks. Finally, the students showed not only the ability to deeply think about and discuss the particular science topics, but also the overall improvement of communicating sharing, and discussing of their science ideas based on scientific evidence and reasoning.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Kuhn,T.S, "The structure of scientific revolutions" The University of Chicago 1962

    2 Latour, "The social construction of scientific facts" 1979

    3 A, "The importance of theories and their development" Teachers College Press 1990

    4 Rivard, L. P.,, "The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study." 84 : 566-593, 2000

    5 Gallas, K., "Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula." Teachers College Press 1995

    6 Kurth, L. A.,, "Student use of narrative and paradigmatic forms of talk in elementary science conversations." 39 (39): 793-818, 2002

    7 Barba, R. H., "Science in the multicultural classroom (2nd ed.)." Allyn & Bacon. 1998

    8 Rutherford, "Science for all Americans" Oxford University Press 1990

    9 Longino, "Science as social knowledge Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry" Princeton Princeton University Press 1990

    10 Anderson, C. W, "Reform in teacher education as building systemic capacity to support the scholarship of teaching. In K. Comfort (Ed.) Advancing standards for science and mathematics education: Views from the field." 1999

    1 Kuhn,T.S, "The structure of scientific revolutions" The University of Chicago 1962

    2 Latour, "The social construction of scientific facts" 1979

    3 A, "The importance of theories and their development" Teachers College Press 1990

    4 Rivard, L. P.,, "The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study." 84 : 566-593, 2000

    5 Gallas, K., "Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula." Teachers College Press 1995

    6 Kurth, L. A.,, "Student use of narrative and paradigmatic forms of talk in elementary science conversations." 39 (39): 793-818, 2002

    7 Barba, R. H., "Science in the multicultural classroom (2nd ed.)." Allyn & Bacon. 1998

    8 Rutherford, "Science for all Americans" Oxford University Press 1990

    9 Longino, "Science as social knowledge Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry" Princeton Princeton University Press 1990

    10 Anderson, C. W, "Reform in teacher education as building systemic capacity to support the scholarship of teaching. In K. Comfort (Ed.) Advancing standards for science and mathematics education: Views from the field." 1999

    11 Erickson, "Qualitative methods in research on teaching Handbook of research on teaching" Macmillan 1986

    12 National Research Council, "National science education standards." National Academy Press 1996

    13 Driver, "Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom" 5-12, 1994

    14 Anderson, C. W.,, "Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group." 97 (97): 359-383, 1997

    15 American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for science literacy" Oxford University Press 1993

    16 Smith, D. C.,, "Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers." 36 (36): 755-776, 1999

    17 Abd-El-Khalick, F.,, "An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching." 34 (34): 673-699, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼